Cargando…
The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case
BACKGROUND: Incorporation of ontologies into annotations has enabled 'semantic integration' of complex data, making explicit the knowledge within a certain field. One of the major bottlenecks in developing bio-ontologies is the lack of a unified methodology. Different methodologies have be...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16725019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-267 |
_version_ | 1782128874283335680 |
---|---|
author | Castro, Alexander Garcia Rocca-Serra, Philippe Stevens, Robert Taylor, Chris Nashar, Karim Ragan, Mark A Sansone, Susanna-Assunta |
author_facet | Castro, Alexander Garcia Rocca-Serra, Philippe Stevens, Robert Taylor, Chris Nashar, Karim Ragan, Mark A Sansone, Susanna-Assunta |
author_sort | Castro, Alexander Garcia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incorporation of ontologies into annotations has enabled 'semantic integration' of complex data, making explicit the knowledge within a certain field. One of the major bottlenecks in developing bio-ontologies is the lack of a unified methodology. Different methodologies have been proposed for different scenarios, but there is no agreed-upon standard methodology for building ontologies. The involvement of geographically distributed domain experts, the need for domain experts to lead the design process, the application of the ontologies and the life cycles of bio-ontologies are amongst the features not considered by previously proposed methodologies. RESULTS: Here, we present a methodology for developing ontologies within the biological domain. We describe our scenario, competency questions, results and milestones for each methodological stage. We introduce the use of concept maps during knowledge acquisition phases as a feasible transition between domain expert and knowledge engineer. CONCLUSION: The contributions of this paper are the thorough description of the steps we suggest when building an ontology, example use of concept maps, consideration of applicability to the development of lower-level ontologies and application to decentralised environments. We have found that within our scenario conceptual maps played an important role in the development process. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1524992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15249922006-08-01 The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case Castro, Alexander Garcia Rocca-Serra, Philippe Stevens, Robert Taylor, Chris Nashar, Karim Ragan, Mark A Sansone, Susanna-Assunta BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Incorporation of ontologies into annotations has enabled 'semantic integration' of complex data, making explicit the knowledge within a certain field. One of the major bottlenecks in developing bio-ontologies is the lack of a unified methodology. Different methodologies have been proposed for different scenarios, but there is no agreed-upon standard methodology for building ontologies. The involvement of geographically distributed domain experts, the need for domain experts to lead the design process, the application of the ontologies and the life cycles of bio-ontologies are amongst the features not considered by previously proposed methodologies. RESULTS: Here, we present a methodology for developing ontologies within the biological domain. We describe our scenario, competency questions, results and milestones for each methodological stage. We introduce the use of concept maps during knowledge acquisition phases as a feasible transition between domain expert and knowledge engineer. CONCLUSION: The contributions of this paper are the thorough description of the steps we suggest when building an ontology, example use of concept maps, consideration of applicability to the development of lower-level ontologies and application to decentralised environments. We have found that within our scenario conceptual maps played an important role in the development process. BioMed Central 2006-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1524992/ /pubmed/16725019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-267 Text en Copyright © 2006 Castro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Castro, Alexander Garcia Rocca-Serra, Philippe Stevens, Robert Taylor, Chris Nashar, Karim Ragan, Mark A Sansone, Susanna-Assunta The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case |
title | The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case |
title_full | The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case |
title_fullStr | The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case |
title_short | The use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case |
title_sort | use of concept maps during knowledge elicitation in ontology development processes – the nutrigenomics use case |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1524992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16725019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-267 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT castroalexandergarcia theuseofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT roccaserraphilippe theuseofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT stevensrobert theuseofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT taylorchris theuseofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT nasharkarim theuseofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT raganmarka theuseofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT sansonesusannaassunta theuseofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT castroalexandergarcia useofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT roccaserraphilippe useofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT stevensrobert useofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT taylorchris useofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT nasharkarim useofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT raganmarka useofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase AT sansonesusannaassunta useofconceptmapsduringknowledgeelicitationinontologydevelopmentprocessesthenutrigenomicsusecase |