Cargando…

Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT, the German biologics register

We investigated the frequency of remission according to the disease activity score (DAS28) definition, modified American Rheumatology Association (ARA) criteria, and the frequency of an achievement of a functional status above defined thresholds ('functional remission', 'physical inde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Listing, Joachim, Strangfeld, Anja, Rau, Rolf, Kekow, Jörn, Gromnica-Ihle, Erika, Klopsch, Thilo, Demary, Winfried, Burmester, Gerd-Rüdiger, Zink, Angela
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1526636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16600016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar1933
_version_ 1782128929849475072
author Listing, Joachim
Strangfeld, Anja
Rau, Rolf
Kekow, Jörn
Gromnica-Ihle, Erika
Klopsch, Thilo
Demary, Winfried
Burmester, Gerd-Rüdiger
Zink, Angela
author_facet Listing, Joachim
Strangfeld, Anja
Rau, Rolf
Kekow, Jörn
Gromnica-Ihle, Erika
Klopsch, Thilo
Demary, Winfried
Burmester, Gerd-Rüdiger
Zink, Angela
author_sort Listing, Joachim
collection PubMed
description We investigated the frequency of remission according to the disease activity score (DAS28) definition, modified American Rheumatology Association (ARA) criteria, and the frequency of an achievement of a functional status above defined thresholds ('functional remission', 'physical independence') in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with either biologics or conventional DMARDs. We used the data of a prospective cohort study, the German biologics register RABBIT (German acronym for Rheumatoid Arthritis – Observation of Biologic Therapy) to investigate the outcomes in RA patients with two or more DMARD failures who received new treatment with biologics (BIOL; n = 818) or a conventional DMARD (n = 265). Logistic regression analysis was applied to adjust for differences in baseline risks. Taking risk indicators such as previous DMARD failures or baseline clinical status into account, we found that biologics doubled the chance of remission compared to conventional DMARD therapies (DAS28 remission, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.95 (95% confidenece interval (CI) 1.2–3.2)); ARA remission, OR 2.05 (95% CI 1.2–3.5)). High remission rates (DAS28 remission, 30.6%; ARA remission, 16.9%) were observed in BIOL patients with a moderate disease activity (DAS28, 3.2 to 5.1) at the start of treatment. These rates decreased to 8.5% in patients with DAS28 > 6. Sustained remission at 6 and 12 months was achieved in <10% of the patients. Severely disabled patients (≤50% of full function) receiving biologic therapies were significantly more likely to achieve a status indicating physical independence (≥67% of full function) than controls (OR 3.88 (95% CI 1.7–8.8)). 'Functional remission' (≥83% of full function) was more often achieved in BIOL than in controls (OR 2.18 (95% CI 1.04–4.6)). In conclusion, our study shows that biologics increase the chance to achieve clinical remission and a status of functional remission or at least physical independence. However, temporary or even sustained remission remain ambitious aims, which are achieved in a minority of patients only.
format Text
id pubmed-1526636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15266362006-08-04 Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT, the German biologics register Listing, Joachim Strangfeld, Anja Rau, Rolf Kekow, Jörn Gromnica-Ihle, Erika Klopsch, Thilo Demary, Winfried Burmester, Gerd-Rüdiger Zink, Angela Arthritis Res Ther Research Article We investigated the frequency of remission according to the disease activity score (DAS28) definition, modified American Rheumatology Association (ARA) criteria, and the frequency of an achievement of a functional status above defined thresholds ('functional remission', 'physical independence') in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with either biologics or conventional DMARDs. We used the data of a prospective cohort study, the German biologics register RABBIT (German acronym for Rheumatoid Arthritis – Observation of Biologic Therapy) to investigate the outcomes in RA patients with two or more DMARD failures who received new treatment with biologics (BIOL; n = 818) or a conventional DMARD (n = 265). Logistic regression analysis was applied to adjust for differences in baseline risks. Taking risk indicators such as previous DMARD failures or baseline clinical status into account, we found that biologics doubled the chance of remission compared to conventional DMARD therapies (DAS28 remission, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.95 (95% confidenece interval (CI) 1.2–3.2)); ARA remission, OR 2.05 (95% CI 1.2–3.5)). High remission rates (DAS28 remission, 30.6%; ARA remission, 16.9%) were observed in BIOL patients with a moderate disease activity (DAS28, 3.2 to 5.1) at the start of treatment. These rates decreased to 8.5% in patients with DAS28 > 6. Sustained remission at 6 and 12 months was achieved in <10% of the patients. Severely disabled patients (≤50% of full function) receiving biologic therapies were significantly more likely to achieve a status indicating physical independence (≥67% of full function) than controls (OR 3.88 (95% CI 1.7–8.8)). 'Functional remission' (≥83% of full function) was more often achieved in BIOL than in controls (OR 2.18 (95% CI 1.04–4.6)). In conclusion, our study shows that biologics increase the chance to achieve clinical remission and a status of functional remission or at least physical independence. However, temporary or even sustained remission remain ambitious aims, which are achieved in a minority of patients only. BioMed Central 2006 2006-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC1526636/ /pubmed/16600016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar1933 Text en Copyright © 2006 Listing et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Listing, Joachim
Strangfeld, Anja
Rau, Rolf
Kekow, Jörn
Gromnica-Ihle, Erika
Klopsch, Thilo
Demary, Winfried
Burmester, Gerd-Rüdiger
Zink, Angela
Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT, the German biologics register
title Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT, the German biologics register
title_full Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT, the German biologics register
title_fullStr Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT, the German biologics register
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT, the German biologics register
title_short Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT, the German biologics register
title_sort clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional dmards overall success rates remain low – results from rabbit, the german biologics register
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1526636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16600016
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar1933
work_keys_str_mv AT listingjoachim clinicalandfunctionalremissioneventhoughbiologicsaresuperiortoconventionaldmardsoverallsuccessratesremainlowresultsfromrabbitthegermanbiologicsregister
AT strangfeldanja clinicalandfunctionalremissioneventhoughbiologicsaresuperiortoconventionaldmardsoverallsuccessratesremainlowresultsfromrabbitthegermanbiologicsregister
AT raurolf clinicalandfunctionalremissioneventhoughbiologicsaresuperiortoconventionaldmardsoverallsuccessratesremainlowresultsfromrabbitthegermanbiologicsregister
AT kekowjorn clinicalandfunctionalremissioneventhoughbiologicsaresuperiortoconventionaldmardsoverallsuccessratesremainlowresultsfromrabbitthegermanbiologicsregister
AT gromnicaihleerika clinicalandfunctionalremissioneventhoughbiologicsaresuperiortoconventionaldmardsoverallsuccessratesremainlowresultsfromrabbitthegermanbiologicsregister
AT klopschthilo clinicalandfunctionalremissioneventhoughbiologicsaresuperiortoconventionaldmardsoverallsuccessratesremainlowresultsfromrabbitthegermanbiologicsregister
AT demarywinfried clinicalandfunctionalremissioneventhoughbiologicsaresuperiortoconventionaldmardsoverallsuccessratesremainlowresultsfromrabbitthegermanbiologicsregister
AT burmestergerdrudiger clinicalandfunctionalremissioneventhoughbiologicsaresuperiortoconventionaldmardsoverallsuccessratesremainlowresultsfromrabbitthegermanbiologicsregister
AT zinkangela clinicalandfunctionalremissioneventhoughbiologicsaresuperiortoconventionaldmardsoverallsuccessratesremainlowresultsfromrabbitthegermanbiologicsregister