Cargando…

Validation of alternative methods for toxicity testing.

Before nonanimal toxicity tests may be officially accepted by regulatory agencies, it is generally agreed that the validity of the new methods must be demonstrated in an independent, scientifically sound validation program. Validation has been defined as the demonstration of the reliability and rele...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruner, L H, Carr, G J, Curren, R D, Chamberlain, M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1533399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9599695
_version_ 1782129039381626880
author Bruner, L H
Carr, G J
Curren, R D
Chamberlain, M
author_facet Bruner, L H
Carr, G J
Curren, R D
Chamberlain, M
author_sort Bruner, L H
collection PubMed
description Before nonanimal toxicity tests may be officially accepted by regulatory agencies, it is generally agreed that the validity of the new methods must be demonstrated in an independent, scientifically sound validation program. Validation has been defined as the demonstration of the reliability and relevance of a test method for a particular purpose. This paper provides a brief review of the development of the theoretical aspects of the validation process and updates current thinking about objectively testing the performance of an alternative method in a validation study. Validation of alternative methods for eye irritation testing is a specific example illustrating important concepts. Although discussion focuses on the validation of alternative methods intended to replace current in vivo toxicity tests, the procedures can be used to assess the performance of alternative methods intended for other uses.
format Text
id pubmed-1533399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1998
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15333992006-08-08 Validation of alternative methods for toxicity testing. Bruner, L H Carr, G J Curren, R D Chamberlain, M Environ Health Perspect Research Article Before nonanimal toxicity tests may be officially accepted by regulatory agencies, it is generally agreed that the validity of the new methods must be demonstrated in an independent, scientifically sound validation program. Validation has been defined as the demonstration of the reliability and relevance of a test method for a particular purpose. This paper provides a brief review of the development of the theoretical aspects of the validation process and updates current thinking about objectively testing the performance of an alternative method in a validation study. Validation of alternative methods for eye irritation testing is a specific example illustrating important concepts. Although discussion focuses on the validation of alternative methods intended to replace current in vivo toxicity tests, the procedures can be used to assess the performance of alternative methods intended for other uses. 1998-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1533399/ /pubmed/9599695 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Bruner, L H
Carr, G J
Curren, R D
Chamberlain, M
Validation of alternative methods for toxicity testing.
title Validation of alternative methods for toxicity testing.
title_full Validation of alternative methods for toxicity testing.
title_fullStr Validation of alternative methods for toxicity testing.
title_full_unstemmed Validation of alternative methods for toxicity testing.
title_short Validation of alternative methods for toxicity testing.
title_sort validation of alternative methods for toxicity testing.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1533399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9599695
work_keys_str_mv AT brunerlh validationofalternativemethodsfortoxicitytesting
AT carrgj validationofalternativemethodsfortoxicitytesting
AT currenrd validationofalternativemethodsfortoxicitytesting
AT chamberlainm validationofalternativemethodsfortoxicitytesting