Cargando…

Neurotoxicity testing: a discussion of in vitro alternatives.

A large number of chemicals may exert adverse effects on the central and/or peripheral nervous system. A commonly recommended strategy for neurotoxicity testing is that of a tiered approach aimed at identifying and characterizing the neurotoxicity of a compound. Guidelines exist in the United States...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Costa, L G
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1533418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9599699
_version_ 1782129043377750016
author Costa, L G
author_facet Costa, L G
author_sort Costa, L G
collection PubMed
description A large number of chemicals may exert adverse effects on the central and/or peripheral nervous system. A commonly recommended strategy for neurotoxicity testing is that of a tiered approach aimed at identifying and characterizing the neurotoxicity of a compound. Guidelines exist in the United States and other countries that define the tests to be utilized in tier 1 testing. To address problems related to the increasing cost and time required for toxicity testing, the increasing number of chemicals being developed, and the concern of animal welfare activists, attention is currently being devoted to in vitro alternatives. This paper addresses the use of in vitro systems in neurotoxicology, and their potential role in a general strategy for neurotoxicity testing. The advantages and disadvantages of in vitro approaches for mechanistic studies and for screening of neurotoxicants are discussed. Suggestions for further validation studies are proposed.
format Text
id pubmed-1533418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1998
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15334182006-08-08 Neurotoxicity testing: a discussion of in vitro alternatives. Costa, L G Environ Health Perspect Research Article A large number of chemicals may exert adverse effects on the central and/or peripheral nervous system. A commonly recommended strategy for neurotoxicity testing is that of a tiered approach aimed at identifying and characterizing the neurotoxicity of a compound. Guidelines exist in the United States and other countries that define the tests to be utilized in tier 1 testing. To address problems related to the increasing cost and time required for toxicity testing, the increasing number of chemicals being developed, and the concern of animal welfare activists, attention is currently being devoted to in vitro alternatives. This paper addresses the use of in vitro systems in neurotoxicology, and their potential role in a general strategy for neurotoxicity testing. The advantages and disadvantages of in vitro approaches for mechanistic studies and for screening of neurotoxicants are discussed. Suggestions for further validation studies are proposed. 1998-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1533418/ /pubmed/9599699 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Costa, L G
Neurotoxicity testing: a discussion of in vitro alternatives.
title Neurotoxicity testing: a discussion of in vitro alternatives.
title_full Neurotoxicity testing: a discussion of in vitro alternatives.
title_fullStr Neurotoxicity testing: a discussion of in vitro alternatives.
title_full_unstemmed Neurotoxicity testing: a discussion of in vitro alternatives.
title_short Neurotoxicity testing: a discussion of in vitro alternatives.
title_sort neurotoxicity testing: a discussion of in vitro alternatives.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1533418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9599699
work_keys_str_mv AT costalg neurotoxicitytestingadiscussionofinvitroalternatives