Cargando…

Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.

This review provides a discussion of cancer risk assessment methodology pertinent to developing a strategy for extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF). Approaches taken for chemical agents or ionizing radiation in six key topic areas are briefly reviewed, and then those areas are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: McCann, J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1533493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9799185
_version_ 1782129059591880704
author McCann, J
author_facet McCann, J
author_sort McCann, J
collection PubMed
description This review provides a discussion of cancer risk assessment methodology pertinent to developing a strategy for extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF). Approaches taken for chemical agents or ionizing radiation in six key topic areas are briefly reviewed, and then those areas are examined from the perspective of EMF, identifying issues to be addressed in developing a risk assessment strategy. The following recommendations are offered: 1) risk assessment should be viewed as an iterative process that informs an overall judgment as to health risk and consists of a complex of related activities incorporating both positive and negative data, tumor and nontumor end points, and human and nonhuman sources of information; 2) a hazard identification resulting in a conclusion of weak or null effects, such as may be associated with EMF, will need to assign significant weight to animal cancer bioassays conducted under defined exposure conditions as well as to human epidemiologic studies; 3) a default factor to account for possible age differences in sensitivity to carcinogenesis should be included in an EMF risk assessment; 4) lack of evidence of dose response and the apparent lack of DNA reactivity of EMF suggest that a safety (or uncertainty) factor or margin of exposure type of risk characterization may be most appropriate; and 5) an EMF risk assessment should permit at least tentative conclusions to be reached as to the limits of carcinogenic risk from exposure to EMF, and should also define an efficient research agenda aimed at clarifying uncertainties appropriate to a more complete assessment.
format Text
id pubmed-1533493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1998
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15334932006-08-08 Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology. McCann, J Environ Health Perspect Research Article This review provides a discussion of cancer risk assessment methodology pertinent to developing a strategy for extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields (EMF). Approaches taken for chemical agents or ionizing radiation in six key topic areas are briefly reviewed, and then those areas are examined from the perspective of EMF, identifying issues to be addressed in developing a risk assessment strategy. The following recommendations are offered: 1) risk assessment should be viewed as an iterative process that informs an overall judgment as to health risk and consists of a complex of related activities incorporating both positive and negative data, tumor and nontumor end points, and human and nonhuman sources of information; 2) a hazard identification resulting in a conclusion of weak or null effects, such as may be associated with EMF, will need to assign significant weight to animal cancer bioassays conducted under defined exposure conditions as well as to human epidemiologic studies; 3) a default factor to account for possible age differences in sensitivity to carcinogenesis should be included in an EMF risk assessment; 4) lack of evidence of dose response and the apparent lack of DNA reactivity of EMF suggest that a safety (or uncertainty) factor or margin of exposure type of risk characterization may be most appropriate; and 5) an EMF risk assessment should permit at least tentative conclusions to be reached as to the limits of carcinogenic risk from exposure to EMF, and should also define an efficient research agenda aimed at clarifying uncertainties appropriate to a more complete assessment. 1998-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1533493/ /pubmed/9799185 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
McCann, J
Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.
title Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.
title_full Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.
title_fullStr Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.
title_full_unstemmed Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.
title_short Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.
title_sort cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1533493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9799185
work_keys_str_mv AT mccannj cancerriskassessmentofextremelylowfrequencyelectricandmagneticfieldsacriticalreviewofmethodology