Cargando…
The limitations of observational studies on the treatment of severe sepsis
Observational studies usually agree with randomised, controlled trials. It is a logical fallacy, however, to suggest that agreement in one direction implies prediction in the other direction. Observational studies are not scientifically capable of proving or disproving hypotheses such as the efficac...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC153444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12512505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1838 |
_version_ | 1782120700942745600 |
---|---|
author | Wiedermann, Christian J |
author_facet | Wiedermann, Christian J |
author_sort | Wiedermann, Christian J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Observational studies usually agree with randomised, controlled trials. It is a logical fallacy, however, to suggest that agreement in one direction implies prediction in the other direction. Observational studies are not scientifically capable of proving or disproving hypotheses such as the efficacy and safety of the treatment of severe sepsis with antithrombin. Observational studies are difficult to analyse and interpret because of the heterogeneity of real-life patient populations, the lack of standardised treatment regimens, the lack of standardised indications for treatment, and the lack of predefined endpoints. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-153444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2002 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-1534442003-04-18 The limitations of observational studies on the treatment of severe sepsis Wiedermann, Christian J Crit Care Letter Observational studies usually agree with randomised, controlled trials. It is a logical fallacy, however, to suggest that agreement in one direction implies prediction in the other direction. Observational studies are not scientifically capable of proving or disproving hypotheses such as the efficacy and safety of the treatment of severe sepsis with antithrombin. Observational studies are difficult to analyse and interpret because of the heterogeneity of real-life patient populations, the lack of standardised treatment regimens, the lack of standardised indications for treatment, and the lack of predefined endpoints. BioMed Central 2002 2002-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC153444/ /pubmed/12512505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1838 Text en Copyright © 2002 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Letter Wiedermann, Christian J The limitations of observational studies on the treatment of severe sepsis |
title | The limitations of observational studies on the treatment of severe sepsis |
title_full | The limitations of observational studies on the treatment of severe sepsis |
title_fullStr | The limitations of observational studies on the treatment of severe sepsis |
title_full_unstemmed | The limitations of observational studies on the treatment of severe sepsis |
title_short | The limitations of observational studies on the treatment of severe sepsis |
title_sort | limitations of observational studies on the treatment of severe sepsis |
topic | Letter |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC153444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12512505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1838 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiedermannchristianj thelimitationsofobservationalstudiesonthetreatmentofseveresepsis AT wiedermannchristianj limitationsofobservationalstudiesonthetreatmentofseveresepsis |