Cargando…
The limitations of observational studies on the treatment of severe sepsis
Observational studies usually agree with randomised, controlled trials. It is a logical fallacy, however, to suggest that agreement in one direction implies prediction in the other direction. Observational studies are not scientifically capable of proving or disproving hypotheses such as the efficac...
Autor principal: | Wiedermann, Christian J |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2002
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC153444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12512505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc1838 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The limitations of observational studies on the treatment of severe sepsis – authors' response
por: Messori, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
All that seems sepsis is not sepsis: However, is this case report really a case of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome?
por: Stichlberger, Martina, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Propensity matching cannot substitute for randomization in albumin studies
por: Wiedermann, Christian J, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Timing of drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in severe sepsis
por: Choi, Goda, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Clinical review: Molecular mechanisms underlying the role of antithrombin in sepsis
por: Wiedermann, Christian J
Publicado: (2006)