Cargando…
MicroSAGE is highly representative and reproducible but reveals major differences in gene expression among samples obtained from similar tissues
BACKGROUND: Serial analysis of gene expression using small amounts of starting material (microSAGE) has not yet been conclusively shown to be representative, reproducible or accurate. RESULTS: We show that microSAGE is highly representative, reproducible and accurate, but that pronounced differences...
Autores principales: | Blackshaw, Seth, Kuo, Winston P, Park, Peter J, Tsujikawa, Motokazu, Gunnersen, Jenny M, Scott, Hamish S, Boon, Wee-Ming, Tan, Seong-Seng, Cepko, Constance L |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC153457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12620102 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Clustering analysis of SAGE data using a Poisson approach
por: Cai, Li, et al.
Publicado: (2004) -
Reproducibility, bioinformatic analysis and power of the SAGE method to evaluate changes in transcriptome
por: Dinel, S., et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
Evaluation of the similarity of gene expression data estimated with SAGE and Affymetrix GeneChips
por: van Ruissen, Fred, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
A transcriptional landscape of 28 porcine tissues obtained by super deepSAGE sequencing
por: Huang, Tinghua, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Sage for undergraduates
por: Bard, Gregory V
Publicado: (2015)