Cargando…

Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices

BACKGROUND: The identification of live cells using membrane integrity dyes has become a frequently used technique, especially with articular cartilage and chondrocytes in situ where tissue slices are used to assess cell recovery as a function of location. The development of a reproducible computeris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jomha, NM, Anoop, PC, Elliott, Janet AW, Bagnall, K, McGann, LE
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC153524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12659649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-5
_version_ 1782120719105130496
author Jomha, NM
Anoop, PC
Elliott, Janet AW
Bagnall, K
McGann, LE
author_facet Jomha, NM
Anoop, PC
Elliott, Janet AW
Bagnall, K
McGann, LE
author_sort Jomha, NM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The identification of live cells using membrane integrity dyes has become a frequently used technique, especially with articular cartilage and chondrocytes in situ where tissue slices are used to assess cell recovery as a function of location. The development of a reproducible computerised method of cell evaluation would eliminate many variables associated with manual counting and significantly reduce the amount of time required to evaluate experimental results. METHODS: To validate a custom computerised counting program, intra-person and inter-person cell counts of nine human evaluators (three groups – unskilled, novice, and experienced) were compared with repeated pixel counts of the custom program on 15 digitised images (in triplicate) of chondrocytes in situ stained with fluorescent dyes. RESULTS: Results indicated increased reproducibility with increased experience within evaluators [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) range = 0.67 (unskilled) to 0.99 (experienced)] and between evaluators [ICC = 0.47 (unskilled), 0.85 (novice), 0.93 (experienced)]. The computer program had perfect reproducibility (ICC = 1.0). There was a significant relationship between the average of the experienced evaluators results and the custom program results (ICC = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that increased experience in cell counting resulted in increased reproducibility both within and between human evaluators but confirmed that the computer program was the most reproducible. There was a good correlation between the intact cell recovery determined by the computer program and the experienced human evaluators. The results of this study showed that the computer counting program was a reproducible tool to evaluate intact cell recovery after use of membrane integrity dyes on chondrocytes in situ. This and the significant decrease in the time used to count the cells by the computer program advocate its use in future studies because it has significant advantages.
format Text
id pubmed-153524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1535242003-04-19 Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices Jomha, NM Anoop, PC Elliott, Janet AW Bagnall, K McGann, LE BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The identification of live cells using membrane integrity dyes has become a frequently used technique, especially with articular cartilage and chondrocytes in situ where tissue slices are used to assess cell recovery as a function of location. The development of a reproducible computerised method of cell evaluation would eliminate many variables associated with manual counting and significantly reduce the amount of time required to evaluate experimental results. METHODS: To validate a custom computerised counting program, intra-person and inter-person cell counts of nine human evaluators (three groups – unskilled, novice, and experienced) were compared with repeated pixel counts of the custom program on 15 digitised images (in triplicate) of chondrocytes in situ stained with fluorescent dyes. RESULTS: Results indicated increased reproducibility with increased experience within evaluators [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) range = 0.67 (unskilled) to 0.99 (experienced)] and between evaluators [ICC = 0.47 (unskilled), 0.85 (novice), 0.93 (experienced)]. The computer program had perfect reproducibility (ICC = 1.0). There was a significant relationship between the average of the experienced evaluators results and the custom program results (ICC = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that increased experience in cell counting resulted in increased reproducibility both within and between human evaluators but confirmed that the computer program was the most reproducible. There was a good correlation between the intact cell recovery determined by the computer program and the experienced human evaluators. The results of this study showed that the computer counting program was a reproducible tool to evaluate intact cell recovery after use of membrane integrity dyes on chondrocytes in situ. This and the significant decrease in the time used to count the cells by the computer program advocate its use in future studies because it has significant advantages. BioMed Central 2003-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC153524/ /pubmed/12659649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-5 Text en Copyright © 2003 Jomha et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jomha, NM
Anoop, PC
Elliott, Janet AW
Bagnall, K
McGann, LE
Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices
title Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices
title_full Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices
title_fullStr Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices
title_full_unstemmed Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices
title_short Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices
title_sort validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC153524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12659649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-5
work_keys_str_mv AT jomhanm validationandreproducibilityofcomputerisedcellviabilityanalysisoftissueslices
AT anooppc validationandreproducibilityofcomputerisedcellviabilityanalysisoftissueslices
AT elliottjanetaw validationandreproducibilityofcomputerisedcellviabilityanalysisoftissueslices
AT bagnallk validationandreproducibilityofcomputerisedcellviabilityanalysisoftissueslices
AT mcgannle validationandreproducibilityofcomputerisedcellviabilityanalysisoftissueslices