Cargando…
Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices
BACKGROUND: The identification of live cells using membrane integrity dyes has become a frequently used technique, especially with articular cartilage and chondrocytes in situ where tissue slices are used to assess cell recovery as a function of location. The development of a reproducible computeris...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC153524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12659649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-5 |
_version_ | 1782120719105130496 |
---|---|
author | Jomha, NM Anoop, PC Elliott, Janet AW Bagnall, K McGann, LE |
author_facet | Jomha, NM Anoop, PC Elliott, Janet AW Bagnall, K McGann, LE |
author_sort | Jomha, NM |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The identification of live cells using membrane integrity dyes has become a frequently used technique, especially with articular cartilage and chondrocytes in situ where tissue slices are used to assess cell recovery as a function of location. The development of a reproducible computerised method of cell evaluation would eliminate many variables associated with manual counting and significantly reduce the amount of time required to evaluate experimental results. METHODS: To validate a custom computerised counting program, intra-person and inter-person cell counts of nine human evaluators (three groups – unskilled, novice, and experienced) were compared with repeated pixel counts of the custom program on 15 digitised images (in triplicate) of chondrocytes in situ stained with fluorescent dyes. RESULTS: Results indicated increased reproducibility with increased experience within evaluators [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) range = 0.67 (unskilled) to 0.99 (experienced)] and between evaluators [ICC = 0.47 (unskilled), 0.85 (novice), 0.93 (experienced)]. The computer program had perfect reproducibility (ICC = 1.0). There was a significant relationship between the average of the experienced evaluators results and the custom program results (ICC = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that increased experience in cell counting resulted in increased reproducibility both within and between human evaluators but confirmed that the computer program was the most reproducible. There was a good correlation between the intact cell recovery determined by the computer program and the experienced human evaluators. The results of this study showed that the computer counting program was a reproducible tool to evaluate intact cell recovery after use of membrane integrity dyes on chondrocytes in situ. This and the significant decrease in the time used to count the cells by the computer program advocate its use in future studies because it has significant advantages. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-153524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-1535242003-04-19 Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices Jomha, NM Anoop, PC Elliott, Janet AW Bagnall, K McGann, LE BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The identification of live cells using membrane integrity dyes has become a frequently used technique, especially with articular cartilage and chondrocytes in situ where tissue slices are used to assess cell recovery as a function of location. The development of a reproducible computerised method of cell evaluation would eliminate many variables associated with manual counting and significantly reduce the amount of time required to evaluate experimental results. METHODS: To validate a custom computerised counting program, intra-person and inter-person cell counts of nine human evaluators (three groups – unskilled, novice, and experienced) were compared with repeated pixel counts of the custom program on 15 digitised images (in triplicate) of chondrocytes in situ stained with fluorescent dyes. RESULTS: Results indicated increased reproducibility with increased experience within evaluators [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) range = 0.67 (unskilled) to 0.99 (experienced)] and between evaluators [ICC = 0.47 (unskilled), 0.85 (novice), 0.93 (experienced)]. The computer program had perfect reproducibility (ICC = 1.0). There was a significant relationship between the average of the experienced evaluators results and the custom program results (ICC = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that increased experience in cell counting resulted in increased reproducibility both within and between human evaluators but confirmed that the computer program was the most reproducible. There was a good correlation between the intact cell recovery determined by the computer program and the experienced human evaluators. The results of this study showed that the computer counting program was a reproducible tool to evaluate intact cell recovery after use of membrane integrity dyes on chondrocytes in situ. This and the significant decrease in the time used to count the cells by the computer program advocate its use in future studies because it has significant advantages. BioMed Central 2003-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC153524/ /pubmed/12659649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-5 Text en Copyright © 2003 Jomha et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jomha, NM Anoop, PC Elliott, Janet AW Bagnall, K McGann, LE Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices |
title | Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices |
title_full | Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices |
title_fullStr | Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices |
title_short | Validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices |
title_sort | validation and reproducibility of computerised cell-viability analysis of tissue slices |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC153524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12659649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-4-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jomhanm validationandreproducibilityofcomputerisedcellviabilityanalysisoftissueslices AT anooppc validationandreproducibilityofcomputerisedcellviabilityanalysisoftissueslices AT elliottjanetaw validationandreproducibilityofcomputerisedcellviabilityanalysisoftissueslices AT bagnallk validationandreproducibilityofcomputerisedcellviabilityanalysisoftissueslices AT mcgannle validationandreproducibilityofcomputerisedcellviabilityanalysisoftissueslices |