Cargando…
Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report
BACKGROUND: Agile is an iterative approach to software development that relies on strong collaboration and automation to keep pace with dynamic environments. We have successfully used agile development approaches to create and maintain biomedical software, including software for bioinformatics. This...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1539031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16734914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-273 |
_version_ | 1782129162923802624 |
---|---|
author | Kane, David W Hohman, Moses M Cerami, Ethan G McCormick, Michael W Kuhlmman, Karl F Byrd, Jeff A |
author_facet | Kane, David W Hohman, Moses M Cerami, Ethan G McCormick, Michael W Kuhlmman, Karl F Byrd, Jeff A |
author_sort | Kane, David W |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Agile is an iterative approach to software development that relies on strong collaboration and automation to keep pace with dynamic environments. We have successfully used agile development approaches to create and maintain biomedical software, including software for bioinformatics. This paper reports on a qualitative study of our experiences using these methods. RESULTS: We have found that agile methods are well suited to the exploratory and iterative nature of scientific inquiry. They provide a robust framework for reproducing scientific results and for developing clinical support systems. The agile development approach also provides a model for collaboration between software engineers and researchers. We present our experience using agile methodologies in projects at six different biomedical software development organizations. The organizations include academic, commercial and government development teams, and included both bioinformatics and clinical support applications. We found that agile practices were a match for the needs of our biomedical projects and contributed to the success of our organizations. CONCLUSION: We found that the agile development approach was a good fit for our organizations, and that these practices should be applicable and valuable to other biomedical software development efforts. Although we found differences in how agile methods were used, we were also able to identify a set of core practices that were common to all of the groups, and that could be a focus for others seeking to adopt these methods. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1539031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15390312006-08-11 Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report Kane, David W Hohman, Moses M Cerami, Ethan G McCormick, Michael W Kuhlmman, Karl F Byrd, Jeff A BMC Bioinformatics Correspondence BACKGROUND: Agile is an iterative approach to software development that relies on strong collaboration and automation to keep pace with dynamic environments. We have successfully used agile development approaches to create and maintain biomedical software, including software for bioinformatics. This paper reports on a qualitative study of our experiences using these methods. RESULTS: We have found that agile methods are well suited to the exploratory and iterative nature of scientific inquiry. They provide a robust framework for reproducing scientific results and for developing clinical support systems. The agile development approach also provides a model for collaboration between software engineers and researchers. We present our experience using agile methodologies in projects at six different biomedical software development organizations. The organizations include academic, commercial and government development teams, and included both bioinformatics and clinical support applications. We found that agile practices were a match for the needs of our biomedical projects and contributed to the success of our organizations. CONCLUSION: We found that the agile development approach was a good fit for our organizations, and that these practices should be applicable and valuable to other biomedical software development efforts. Although we found differences in how agile methods were used, we were also able to identify a set of core practices that were common to all of the groups, and that could be a focus for others seeking to adopt these methods. BioMed Central 2006-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC1539031/ /pubmed/16734914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-273 Text en Copyright © 2006 Kane et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Correspondence Kane, David W Hohman, Moses M Cerami, Ethan G McCormick, Michael W Kuhlmman, Karl F Byrd, Jeff A Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report |
title | Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report |
title_full | Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report |
title_fullStr | Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report |
title_full_unstemmed | Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report |
title_short | Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report |
title_sort | agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report |
topic | Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1539031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16734914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanedavidw agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport AT hohmanmosesm agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport AT ceramiethang agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport AT mccormickmichaelw agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport AT kuhlmmankarlf agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport AT byrdjeffa agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport |