Cargando…

Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report

BACKGROUND: Agile is an iterative approach to software development that relies on strong collaboration and automation to keep pace with dynamic environments. We have successfully used agile development approaches to create and maintain biomedical software, including software for bioinformatics. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kane, David W, Hohman, Moses M, Cerami, Ethan G, McCormick, Michael W, Kuhlmman, Karl F, Byrd, Jeff A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1539031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16734914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-273
_version_ 1782129162923802624
author Kane, David W
Hohman, Moses M
Cerami, Ethan G
McCormick, Michael W
Kuhlmman, Karl F
Byrd, Jeff A
author_facet Kane, David W
Hohman, Moses M
Cerami, Ethan G
McCormick, Michael W
Kuhlmman, Karl F
Byrd, Jeff A
author_sort Kane, David W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Agile is an iterative approach to software development that relies on strong collaboration and automation to keep pace with dynamic environments. We have successfully used agile development approaches to create and maintain biomedical software, including software for bioinformatics. This paper reports on a qualitative study of our experiences using these methods. RESULTS: We have found that agile methods are well suited to the exploratory and iterative nature of scientific inquiry. They provide a robust framework for reproducing scientific results and for developing clinical support systems. The agile development approach also provides a model for collaboration between software engineers and researchers. We present our experience using agile methodologies in projects at six different biomedical software development organizations. The organizations include academic, commercial and government development teams, and included both bioinformatics and clinical support applications. We found that agile practices were a match for the needs of our biomedical projects and contributed to the success of our organizations. CONCLUSION: We found that the agile development approach was a good fit for our organizations, and that these practices should be applicable and valuable to other biomedical software development efforts. Although we found differences in how agile methods were used, we were also able to identify a set of core practices that were common to all of the groups, and that could be a focus for others seeking to adopt these methods.
format Text
id pubmed-1539031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15390312006-08-11 Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report Kane, David W Hohman, Moses M Cerami, Ethan G McCormick, Michael W Kuhlmman, Karl F Byrd, Jeff A BMC Bioinformatics Correspondence BACKGROUND: Agile is an iterative approach to software development that relies on strong collaboration and automation to keep pace with dynamic environments. We have successfully used agile development approaches to create and maintain biomedical software, including software for bioinformatics. This paper reports on a qualitative study of our experiences using these methods. RESULTS: We have found that agile methods are well suited to the exploratory and iterative nature of scientific inquiry. They provide a robust framework for reproducing scientific results and for developing clinical support systems. The agile development approach also provides a model for collaboration between software engineers and researchers. We present our experience using agile methodologies in projects at six different biomedical software development organizations. The organizations include academic, commercial and government development teams, and included both bioinformatics and clinical support applications. We found that agile practices were a match for the needs of our biomedical projects and contributed to the success of our organizations. CONCLUSION: We found that the agile development approach was a good fit for our organizations, and that these practices should be applicable and valuable to other biomedical software development efforts. Although we found differences in how agile methods were used, we were also able to identify a set of core practices that were common to all of the groups, and that could be a focus for others seeking to adopt these methods. BioMed Central 2006-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC1539031/ /pubmed/16734914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-273 Text en Copyright © 2006 Kane et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Kane, David W
Hohman, Moses M
Cerami, Ethan G
McCormick, Michael W
Kuhlmman, Karl F
Byrd, Jeff A
Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report
title Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report
title_full Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report
title_fullStr Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report
title_full_unstemmed Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report
title_short Agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report
title_sort agile methods in biomedical software development: a multi-site experience report
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1539031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16734914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-273
work_keys_str_mv AT kanedavidw agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport
AT hohmanmosesm agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport
AT ceramiethang agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport
AT mccormickmichaelw agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport
AT kuhlmmankarlf agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport
AT byrdjeffa agilemethodsinbiomedicalsoftwaredevelopmentamultisiteexperiencereport