Cargando…

Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence

BACKGROUND: Hospital-based clinicians have been shown to use and attain benefits from online evidence systems. To our knowledge there have been no studies investigating whether and how ambulance officers use online evidence systems if provided. We surveyed ambulance officers to examine their knowled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Westbrook, Johanna I, Westbrook, Mary T, Gosling, A Sophie
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1544324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16872507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-6-31
_version_ 1782129195587993600
author Westbrook, Johanna I
Westbrook, Mary T
Gosling, A Sophie
author_facet Westbrook, Johanna I
Westbrook, Mary T
Gosling, A Sophie
author_sort Westbrook, Johanna I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital-based clinicians have been shown to use and attain benefits from online evidence systems. To our knowledge there have been no studies investigating whether and how ambulance officers use online evidence systems if provided. We surveyed ambulance officers to examine their knowledge and use of the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP), an online evidence system providing 24-hour access to information to support evidence-based practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was completed by 278 ambulance officers in New South Wales, Australia. Comparisons were made between those who used CIAP and officers who had heard of, but not used CIAP. RESULTS: Half the sample (48.6%) knew of, and 28.8% had used CIAP. Users were more likely to have heard of CIAP from a CIAP representative/presentation, non-users from written information. Compared to ambulance officers who had heard of but had not used CIAP, users were more likely to report better computer skills and that their supervisors regarded use of CIAP as a legitimate part of ambulance officers' clinical role. The main reasons for non-use were lack of access(49.0%) and training(31.4%). Of users, 51.3% rated their skills at finding information as good/very good, 67.5% found the information sought all/most of the time, 87.3% believed CIAP had the potential to improve patient care and 28.2% had directly experienced this. Most access to CIAP occurred at home. The databases frequently accessed were MIMS (A medicines information database) (73.8%) and MEDLINE(67.5%). The major journals accessed were Journal of Emergency Nursing(37.5%), American Journal of Medicine(30.0%) and JAMA(27.5%). CONCLUSION: Over half of ambulance officers had not heard of CIAP. The proportion who knew about and used CIAP was also low. Reasons for this appear to be a work culture not convinced of CIAP's relevance to pre-hospital patient care and lack of access to CIAP at work. Ambulance officers who used CIAP accessed it primarily from home and valued it highly. Lack of access to CIAP at central work locations deprives ambulance officers of many of the benefits of an online evidence system.
format Text
id pubmed-1544324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15443242006-08-16 Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence Westbrook, Johanna I Westbrook, Mary T Gosling, A Sophie BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Hospital-based clinicians have been shown to use and attain benefits from online evidence systems. To our knowledge there have been no studies investigating whether and how ambulance officers use online evidence systems if provided. We surveyed ambulance officers to examine their knowledge and use of the Clinical Information Access Program (CIAP), an online evidence system providing 24-hour access to information to support evidence-based practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was completed by 278 ambulance officers in New South Wales, Australia. Comparisons were made between those who used CIAP and officers who had heard of, but not used CIAP. RESULTS: Half the sample (48.6%) knew of, and 28.8% had used CIAP. Users were more likely to have heard of CIAP from a CIAP representative/presentation, non-users from written information. Compared to ambulance officers who had heard of but had not used CIAP, users were more likely to report better computer skills and that their supervisors regarded use of CIAP as a legitimate part of ambulance officers' clinical role. The main reasons for non-use were lack of access(49.0%) and training(31.4%). Of users, 51.3% rated their skills at finding information as good/very good, 67.5% found the information sought all/most of the time, 87.3% believed CIAP had the potential to improve patient care and 28.2% had directly experienced this. Most access to CIAP occurred at home. The databases frequently accessed were MIMS (A medicines information database) (73.8%) and MEDLINE(67.5%). The major journals accessed were Journal of Emergency Nursing(37.5%), American Journal of Medicine(30.0%) and JAMA(27.5%). CONCLUSION: Over half of ambulance officers had not heard of CIAP. The proportion who knew about and used CIAP was also low. Reasons for this appear to be a work culture not convinced of CIAP's relevance to pre-hospital patient care and lack of access to CIAP at work. Ambulance officers who used CIAP accessed it primarily from home and valued it highly. Lack of access to CIAP at central work locations deprives ambulance officers of many of the benefits of an online evidence system. BioMed Central 2006-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1544324/ /pubmed/16872507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-6-31 Text en Copyright © 2006 Westbrook et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Westbrook, Johanna I
Westbrook, Mary T
Gosling, A Sophie
Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence
title Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence
title_full Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence
title_fullStr Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence
title_full_unstemmed Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence
title_short Ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence
title_sort ambulance officers' use of online clinical evidence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1544324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16872507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-6-31
work_keys_str_mv AT westbrookjohannai ambulanceofficersuseofonlineclinicalevidence
AT westbrookmaryt ambulanceofficersuseofonlineclinicalevidence
AT goslingasophie ambulanceofficersuseofonlineclinicalevidence