Cargando…
Non-differential measurement error does not always bias diagnostic likelihood ratios towards the null
Diagnostic test evaluations are susceptible to random and systematic error. Simulated non-differential random error for six different error distributions was evaluated for its effect on measures of diagnostic accuracy for a brucellosis competitive ELISA. Test results were divided into four categorie...
Autor principal: | Fosgate, GT |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16846512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-3-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Mitigation of biases in estimating hazard ratios under non-sensitive and non-specific observation of outcomes–applications to influenza vaccine effectiveness
por: Baum, Ulrike, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
(Errors in statistical tests)(3)
por: Phillips, Carl V, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Measuring additive interaction using odds ratios
por: Kalilani, Linda, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Challenges in measuring measles case fatality ratios in settings without vital registration
por: Cairns, K Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
On hazard ratio estimators by proportional hazards models in matched-pair cohort studies
por: Shinozaki, Tomohiro, et al.
Publicado: (2017)