Cargando…

An update on prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients

Both the recently updated consensus guidelines published by the American College of Chest Physicians, and the International Union of Angiology recommend thromboprophylaxis with either low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) in medical patients at risk of VTE. However, no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samama, Meyer Michel, Kleber, Franz-Xaver
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16817957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-4-8
_version_ 1782129218845409280
author Samama, Meyer Michel
Kleber, Franz-Xaver
author_facet Samama, Meyer Michel
Kleber, Franz-Xaver
author_sort Samama, Meyer Michel
collection PubMed
description Both the recently updated consensus guidelines published by the American College of Chest Physicians, and the International Union of Angiology recommend thromboprophylaxis with either low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) in medical patients at risk of VTE. However, no guidance is given regarding the appropriate dosing regimens that should be used for thromboprophylaxis in this patient group. LMWH (enoxaparin and dalteparin) and UFH have been shown to be effective for thromboprophylaxis in at-risk hospitalized medical patients. Although LMWH once daily (o.d.) has been shown to be as effective as UFH three times daily (t.i.d.) for thromboprophylaxis in at-risk medical patients, there are no data to show that UFH twice daily (b.i.d) is as effective as either LMWH o.d. or UFH t.i.d. On the basis of currently available evidence, the LMWHs enoxaparin and dalteparin are more attractive alternatives to UFH for the prevention of VTE in hospitalized medical patients because of their convenient once-daily administration and better safety profile, demonstrated in terms of reduced bleeding, HIT, and other adverse events.
format Text
id pubmed-1550384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15503842006-08-18 An update on prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients Samama, Meyer Michel Kleber, Franz-Xaver Thromb J Review Both the recently updated consensus guidelines published by the American College of Chest Physicians, and the International Union of Angiology recommend thromboprophylaxis with either low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) in medical patients at risk of VTE. However, no guidance is given regarding the appropriate dosing regimens that should be used for thromboprophylaxis in this patient group. LMWH (enoxaparin and dalteparin) and UFH have been shown to be effective for thromboprophylaxis in at-risk hospitalized medical patients. Although LMWH once daily (o.d.) has been shown to be as effective as UFH three times daily (t.i.d.) for thromboprophylaxis in at-risk medical patients, there are no data to show that UFH twice daily (b.i.d) is as effective as either LMWH o.d. or UFH t.i.d. On the basis of currently available evidence, the LMWHs enoxaparin and dalteparin are more attractive alternatives to UFH for the prevention of VTE in hospitalized medical patients because of their convenient once-daily administration and better safety profile, demonstrated in terms of reduced bleeding, HIT, and other adverse events. BioMed Central 2006-07-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1550384/ /pubmed/16817957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-4-8 Text en Copyright © 2006 Samama and Kleber; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Samama, Meyer Michel
Kleber, Franz-Xaver
An update on prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients
title An update on prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients
title_full An update on prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients
title_fullStr An update on prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients
title_full_unstemmed An update on prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients
title_short An update on prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients
title_sort update on prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16817957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-9560-4-8
work_keys_str_mv AT samamameyermichel anupdateonpreventionofvenousthromboembolisminhospitalizedacutelyillmedicalpatients
AT kleberfranzxaver anupdateonpreventionofvenousthromboembolisminhospitalizedacutelyillmedicalpatients
AT samamameyermichel updateonpreventionofvenousthromboembolisminhospitalizedacutelyillmedicalpatients
AT kleberfranzxaver updateonpreventionofvenousthromboembolisminhospitalizedacutelyillmedicalpatients