Cargando…

The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians

BACKGROUND: Public use of the Internet for health information is increasing but its effect on health care is unclear. We studied physicians' experience of patients looking for health information on the Internet and their perceptions of the impact of this information on the physician-patient rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murray, Elizabeth, Lo, Bernard, Pollack, Lance, Donelan, Karen, Catania, Joe, Lee, Ken, Zapert, Kinga, Turner, Rachel
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14517108
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17
_version_ 1782129235170689024
author Murray, Elizabeth
Lo, Bernard
Pollack, Lance
Donelan, Karen
Catania, Joe
Lee, Ken
Zapert, Kinga
Turner, Rachel
author_facet Murray, Elizabeth
Lo, Bernard
Pollack, Lance
Donelan, Karen
Catania, Joe
Lee, Ken
Zapert, Kinga
Turner, Rachel
author_sort Murray, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Public use of the Internet for health information is increasing but its effect on health care is unclear. We studied physicians' experience of patients looking for health information on the Internet and their perceptions of the impact of this information on the physician-patient relationship, health care, and workload. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of a nationally-representative sample of United States physicians (1050 respondents; response rate 53%). RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of respondents had experienced a patient bringing Internet information to a visit. The quality of information was important: accurate, relevant information benefited, while inaccurate or irrelevant information harmed health care, health outcomes, and the physician-patient relationship. However, the physician's feeling that the patient was challenging his or her authority was the most consistent predictor of a perceived deterioration in the physician-patient relationship (OR = 14.9; 95% CI, 5.5-40.5), in the quality of health care (OR = 3.4; 95% CI, 1.1-10.9), or health outcomes (OR = 5.6; 95% CI, 1.7-18.7). Thirty-eight percent of physicians believed that the patient bringing in information made the visit less time efficient, particularly if the patient wanted something inappropriate (OR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.4), or the physician felt challenged (OR = 3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-7.2). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of information on the Internet is paramount: accurate relevant information is beneficial, while inaccurate information is harmful. Physicians appear to acquiesce to clinically-inappropriate requests generated by information from the Internet, either for fear of damaging the physician-patient relationship or because of the negative effect on time efficiency of not doing so. A minority of physicians feels challenged by patients bringing health information to the visit; reasons for this require further research.
format Text
id pubmed-1550564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15505642006-10-13 The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians Murray, Elizabeth Lo, Bernard Pollack, Lance Donelan, Karen Catania, Joe Lee, Ken Zapert, Kinga Turner, Rachel J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Public use of the Internet for health information is increasing but its effect on health care is unclear. We studied physicians' experience of patients looking for health information on the Internet and their perceptions of the impact of this information on the physician-patient relationship, health care, and workload. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of a nationally-representative sample of United States physicians (1050 respondents; response rate 53%). RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of respondents had experienced a patient bringing Internet information to a visit. The quality of information was important: accurate, relevant information benefited, while inaccurate or irrelevant information harmed health care, health outcomes, and the physician-patient relationship. However, the physician's feeling that the patient was challenging his or her authority was the most consistent predictor of a perceived deterioration in the physician-patient relationship (OR = 14.9; 95% CI, 5.5-40.5), in the quality of health care (OR = 3.4; 95% CI, 1.1-10.9), or health outcomes (OR = 5.6; 95% CI, 1.7-18.7). Thirty-eight percent of physicians believed that the patient bringing in information made the visit less time efficient, particularly if the patient wanted something inappropriate (OR = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.4), or the physician felt challenged (OR = 3.6; 95% CI, 1.8-7.2). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of information on the Internet is paramount: accurate relevant information is beneficial, while inaccurate information is harmful. Physicians appear to acquiesce to clinically-inappropriate requests generated by information from the Internet, either for fear of damaging the physician-patient relationship or because of the negative effect on time efficiency of not doing so. A minority of physicians feels challenged by patients bringing health information to the visit; reasons for this require further research. Gunther Eysenbach 2003-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1550564/ /pubmed/14517108 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17 Text en © Elizabeth Murray, Bernard Lo, Lance Pollack, Karen Donelan, Joe Catania, Ken Lee, Kinga Zapert, Rachel Turner. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 29.8.2003. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Murray, Elizabeth
Lo, Bernard
Pollack, Lance
Donelan, Karen
Catania, Joe
Lee, Ken
Zapert, Kinga
Turner, Rachel
The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians
title The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians
title_full The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians
title_fullStr The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians
title_short The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians
title_sort impact of health information on the internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national u.s. survey among 1.050 u.s. physicians
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14517108
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17
work_keys_str_mv AT murrayelizabeth theimpactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT lobernard theimpactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT pollacklance theimpactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT donelankaren theimpactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT cataniajoe theimpactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT leeken theimpactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT zapertkinga theimpactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT turnerrachel theimpactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT murrayelizabeth impactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT lobernard impactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT pollacklance impactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT donelankaren impactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT cataniajoe impactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT leeken impactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT zapertkinga impactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians
AT turnerrachel impactofhealthinformationontheinternetonhealthcareandthephysicianpatientrelationshipnationalussurveyamong1050usphysicians