Cargando…

Online Consumer Surveys as a Methodology for Assessing the Quality of the United States Health Care System

BACKGROUND: Interest in monitoring the quality of health care in the United States has increased in recent years. However, the policy objectives associated with collecting this information are constrained by the limited availability of timely and relevant data at a reasonable cost. Online data-colle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bethell, Christina, Fiorillo, John, Lansky, David, Hendryx, Michael, Knickman, James
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15111268
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.1.e2
_version_ 1782129240561418240
author Bethell, Christina
Fiorillo, John
Lansky, David
Hendryx, Michael
Knickman, James
author_facet Bethell, Christina
Fiorillo, John
Lansky, David
Hendryx, Michael
Knickman, James
author_sort Bethell, Christina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interest in monitoring the quality of health care in the United States has increased in recent years. However, the policy objectives associated with collecting this information are constrained by the limited availability of timely and relevant data at a reasonable cost. Online data-collection technologies hold the promise of gathering data directly and inexpensively from large, representative samples of patients and consumers. These new information technologies also permit efficient, real-time assessment in such areas as health status, access to care, and other aspects of the care experience that impact health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the feasibility, validity, and generalizability of consumer online surveys to measure key aspects of health care quality in the United States. METHODS: Surveys about the health and health care experiences of a general adult population and of adults with diabetes were administered online and by telephone. The online survey drew from a sample frame of nearly 1 million consumers and used a single e-mail notification. The random-digit-dial methodology included 6 follow-up calls. Results from the online sample were compared to the telephone sample and to national benchmark data. RESULTS: Survey responses about quality of care collected using online and telephone methods were commensurate once they were weighted to represent the demographic distribution of the 2000 United States Census. Expected variations in health and health care quality across demographic and socioeconomic groups were largely observed, as were hypothesized associations among quality indicators and other variables. Fewer individuals were required to be contacted to achieve target sample sizes using online versus telephone methods. Neither method yielded representative cohorts of nonwhite individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions about the level and variations in health care quality in the United States are similar using data collected in this study compared to data collected using other telephone-based survey methods. As is typical for national telephone surveys conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, stratified sampling and weighting of survey responses is necessary for results to be generalizable. Online methods are more appropriate for understanding health care quality than for conducting epidemiologic assessments of health in the United States.
format Text
id pubmed-1550587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15505872006-10-13 Online Consumer Surveys as a Methodology for Assessing the Quality of the United States Health Care System Bethell, Christina Fiorillo, John Lansky, David Hendryx, Michael Knickman, James J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Interest in monitoring the quality of health care in the United States has increased in recent years. However, the policy objectives associated with collecting this information are constrained by the limited availability of timely and relevant data at a reasonable cost. Online data-collection technologies hold the promise of gathering data directly and inexpensively from large, representative samples of patients and consumers. These new information technologies also permit efficient, real-time assessment in such areas as health status, access to care, and other aspects of the care experience that impact health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the feasibility, validity, and generalizability of consumer online surveys to measure key aspects of health care quality in the United States. METHODS: Surveys about the health and health care experiences of a general adult population and of adults with diabetes were administered online and by telephone. The online survey drew from a sample frame of nearly 1 million consumers and used a single e-mail notification. The random-digit-dial methodology included 6 follow-up calls. Results from the online sample were compared to the telephone sample and to national benchmark data. RESULTS: Survey responses about quality of care collected using online and telephone methods were commensurate once they were weighted to represent the demographic distribution of the 2000 United States Census. Expected variations in health and health care quality across demographic and socioeconomic groups were largely observed, as were hypothesized associations among quality indicators and other variables. Fewer individuals were required to be contacted to achieve target sample sizes using online versus telephone methods. Neither method yielded representative cohorts of nonwhite individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions about the level and variations in health care quality in the United States are similar using data collected in this study compared to data collected using other telephone-based survey methods. As is typical for national telephone surveys conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, stratified sampling and weighting of survey responses is necessary for results to be generalizable. Online methods are more appropriate for understanding health care quality than for conducting epidemiologic assessments of health in the United States. Gunther Eysenbach 2004-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC1550587/ /pubmed/15111268 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.1.e2 Text en © Christina Bethell, John Fiorillo, David Lansky, Michael Hendryx, James Knickman. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 20.1.2004. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bethell, Christina
Fiorillo, John
Lansky, David
Hendryx, Michael
Knickman, James
Online Consumer Surveys as a Methodology for Assessing the Quality of the United States Health Care System
title Online Consumer Surveys as a Methodology for Assessing the Quality of the United States Health Care System
title_full Online Consumer Surveys as a Methodology for Assessing the Quality of the United States Health Care System
title_fullStr Online Consumer Surveys as a Methodology for Assessing the Quality of the United States Health Care System
title_full_unstemmed Online Consumer Surveys as a Methodology for Assessing the Quality of the United States Health Care System
title_short Online Consumer Surveys as a Methodology for Assessing the Quality of the United States Health Care System
title_sort online consumer surveys as a methodology for assessing the quality of the united states health care system
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15111268
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.1.e2
work_keys_str_mv AT bethellchristina onlineconsumersurveysasamethodologyforassessingthequalityoftheunitedstateshealthcaresystem
AT fiorillojohn onlineconsumersurveysasamethodologyforassessingthequalityoftheunitedstateshealthcaresystem
AT lanskydavid onlineconsumersurveysasamethodologyforassessingthequalityoftheunitedstateshealthcaresystem
AT hendryxmichael onlineconsumersurveysasamethodologyforassessingthequalityoftheunitedstateshealthcaresystem
AT knickmanjames onlineconsumersurveysasamethodologyforassessingthequalityoftheunitedstateshealthcaresystem