Cargando…

Setting the Public Agenda for Online Health Search: A White Paper and Action Agenda

BACKGROUND: Searches for health information are among the most common reasons that consumers use the Internet. Both consumers and quality experts have raised concerns about the quality of information on the Web and the ability of consumers to find accurate information that meets their needs. OBJECTI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenberg, Liza, D'Andrea, Guy, Lorence, Dan
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15249267
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.2.e18
_version_ 1782129241723240448
author Greenberg, Liza
D'Andrea, Guy
Lorence, Dan
author_facet Greenberg, Liza
D'Andrea, Guy
Lorence, Dan
author_sort Greenberg, Liza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Searches for health information are among the most common reasons that consumers use the Internet. Both consumers and quality experts have raised concerns about the quality of information on the Web and the ability of consumers to find accurate information that meets their needs. OBJECTIVE: To produce a national stakeholder-driven agenda for research, technical improvements, and education that will improve the results of consumer searches for health information on the Internet. METHODS: URAC, a national accreditation organization, and Consumer WebWatch (CWW), a project of Consumers Union (a consumer advocacy organization), conducted a review of factors influencing the results of online health searches. The organizations convened two stakeholder groups of consumers, quality experts, search engine experts, researchers, health-care providers, informatics specialists, and others. Meeting participants reviewed existing information and developed recommendations for improving the results of online consumer searches for health information. Participants were not asked to vote on or endorse the recommendations. Our working definition of a quality Web site was one that contained accurate, reliable, and complete information. RESULTS: The Internet has greatly improved access to health information for consumers. There is great variation in how consumers seek information via the Internet, and in how successful they are in searching for health information. Further, there is variation among Web sites, both in quality and accessibility. Many Web site features affect the capability of search engines to find and index them. CONCLUSIONS: Research is needed to define quality elements of Web sites that could be retrieved by search engines and understand how to meet the needs of different types of searchers. Technological research should seek to develop more sophisticated approaches for tagging information, and to develop searches that "learn" from consumer behavior. Finally, education initiatives are needed to help consumers search more effectively and to help them critically evaluate the information they find.
format Text
id pubmed-1550592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15505922006-10-13 Setting the Public Agenda for Online Health Search: A White Paper and Action Agenda Greenberg, Liza D'Andrea, Guy Lorence, Dan J Med Internet Res Viewpoint BACKGROUND: Searches for health information are among the most common reasons that consumers use the Internet. Both consumers and quality experts have raised concerns about the quality of information on the Web and the ability of consumers to find accurate information that meets their needs. OBJECTIVE: To produce a national stakeholder-driven agenda for research, technical improvements, and education that will improve the results of consumer searches for health information on the Internet. METHODS: URAC, a national accreditation organization, and Consumer WebWatch (CWW), a project of Consumers Union (a consumer advocacy organization), conducted a review of factors influencing the results of online health searches. The organizations convened two stakeholder groups of consumers, quality experts, search engine experts, researchers, health-care providers, informatics specialists, and others. Meeting participants reviewed existing information and developed recommendations for improving the results of online consumer searches for health information. Participants were not asked to vote on or endorse the recommendations. Our working definition of a quality Web site was one that contained accurate, reliable, and complete information. RESULTS: The Internet has greatly improved access to health information for consumers. There is great variation in how consumers seek information via the Internet, and in how successful they are in searching for health information. Further, there is variation among Web sites, both in quality and accessibility. Many Web site features affect the capability of search engines to find and index them. CONCLUSIONS: Research is needed to define quality elements of Web sites that could be retrieved by search engines and understand how to meet the needs of different types of searchers. Technological research should seek to develop more sophisticated approaches for tagging information, and to develop searches that "learn" from consumer behavior. Finally, education initiatives are needed to help consumers search more effectively and to help them critically evaluate the information they find. Gunther Eysenbach 2004-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC1550592/ /pubmed/15249267 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.2.e18 Text en © Liza Greenberg, Guy D'Andrea, Dan Lorence. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 8.6.2004. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Greenberg, Liza
D'Andrea, Guy
Lorence, Dan
Setting the Public Agenda for Online Health Search: A White Paper and Action Agenda
title Setting the Public Agenda for Online Health Search: A White Paper and Action Agenda
title_full Setting the Public Agenda for Online Health Search: A White Paper and Action Agenda
title_fullStr Setting the Public Agenda for Online Health Search: A White Paper and Action Agenda
title_full_unstemmed Setting the Public Agenda for Online Health Search: A White Paper and Action Agenda
title_short Setting the Public Agenda for Online Health Search: A White Paper and Action Agenda
title_sort setting the public agenda for online health search: a white paper and action agenda
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15249267
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6.2.e18
work_keys_str_mv AT greenbergliza settingthepublicagendaforonlinehealthsearchawhitepaperandactionagenda
AT dandreaguy settingthepublicagendaforonlinehealthsearchawhitepaperandactionagenda
AT lorencedan settingthepublicagendaforonlinehealthsearchawhitepaperandactionagenda