Cargando…

Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web

BACKGROUND: The incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases is directly related to the number of unvaccinated children. Parents who refuse vaccination of their children frequently express concerns about vaccine safety. The Internet can influence perceptions about vaccines because it is the fastest gro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zimmerman, Richard K, Wolfe, Robert M, Fox, Dwight E, Fox, Jake R, Nowalk, Mary Patricia, Troy, Judith A, Sharp, Lisa K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15998608
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.2.e17
_version_ 1782129253608849408
author Zimmerman, Richard K
Wolfe, Robert M
Fox, Dwight E
Fox, Jake R
Nowalk, Mary Patricia
Troy, Judith A
Sharp, Lisa K
author_facet Zimmerman, Richard K
Wolfe, Robert M
Fox, Dwight E
Fox, Jake R
Nowalk, Mary Patricia
Troy, Judith A
Sharp, Lisa K
author_sort Zimmerman, Richard K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases is directly related to the number of unvaccinated children. Parents who refuse vaccination of their children frequently express concerns about vaccine safety. The Internet can influence perceptions about vaccines because it is the fastest growing source of consumer health information. However, few studies have analyzed vaccine criticism on the Web. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this paper are to examine vaccine criticism on the Internet and to analyze the websites in order to identify common characteristics and ethical allegations. METHODS: A structured Web search was conducted for the terms “vaccine,” “vaccination,” “vaccinate,” and “anti-vaccination” using a metasearch program that incorporated 8 search engines. This yielded 1138 Web pages representing 750 sites. Two researchers reviewed the sites for inclusion/exclusion criteria, resulting in 78 vaccine-critical sites, which were then abstracted for design, content, and allegations. RESULTS: The most common characteristic of vaccine-critical websites was the inclusion of statements linking vaccinations with specific adverse reactions, especially idiopathic chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, autism, and diabetes. Other common attributes (≥ 70% of websites) were links to other vaccine-critical websites; charges that vaccines contain contaminants, mercury, or “hot lots” that cause adverse events; claims that vaccines provide only temporary protection and that the diseases prevented are mild; appeals for responsible parenting through education and resisting the establishment; allegations of conspiracies and cover-ups to hide the truth about vaccine safety; and charges that civil liberties are violated through mandatory vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine-critical websites frequently make serious allegations. With the burgeoning of the Internet as a health information source, an undiscerning or incompletely educated public may accept these claims and refuse vaccination of their children. As this occurs, the incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases can be expected to rise.
format Text
id pubmed-1550643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15506432006-10-13 Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web Zimmerman, Richard K Wolfe, Robert M Fox, Dwight E Fox, Jake R Nowalk, Mary Patricia Troy, Judith A Sharp, Lisa K J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases is directly related to the number of unvaccinated children. Parents who refuse vaccination of their children frequently express concerns about vaccine safety. The Internet can influence perceptions about vaccines because it is the fastest growing source of consumer health information. However, few studies have analyzed vaccine criticism on the Web. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this paper are to examine vaccine criticism on the Internet and to analyze the websites in order to identify common characteristics and ethical allegations. METHODS: A structured Web search was conducted for the terms “vaccine,” “vaccination,” “vaccinate,” and “anti-vaccination” using a metasearch program that incorporated 8 search engines. This yielded 1138 Web pages representing 750 sites. Two researchers reviewed the sites for inclusion/exclusion criteria, resulting in 78 vaccine-critical sites, which were then abstracted for design, content, and allegations. RESULTS: The most common characteristic of vaccine-critical websites was the inclusion of statements linking vaccinations with specific adverse reactions, especially idiopathic chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis, autism, and diabetes. Other common attributes (≥ 70% of websites) were links to other vaccine-critical websites; charges that vaccines contain contaminants, mercury, or “hot lots” that cause adverse events; claims that vaccines provide only temporary protection and that the diseases prevented are mild; appeals for responsible parenting through education and resisting the establishment; allegations of conspiracies and cover-ups to hide the truth about vaccine safety; and charges that civil liberties are violated through mandatory vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine-critical websites frequently make serious allegations. With the burgeoning of the Internet as a health information source, an undiscerning or incompletely educated public may accept these claims and refuse vaccination of their children. As this occurs, the incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases can be expected to rise. Gunther Eysenbach 2005-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC1550643/ /pubmed/15998608 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.2.e17 Text en © Richard K Zimmerman, Robert M Wolfe, Dwight E Fox, Jake R Fox, Mary Patricia Nowalk, Judith A Troy, Lisa K Sharp. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 29.6.2005. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Zimmerman, Richard K
Wolfe, Robert M
Fox, Dwight E
Fox, Jake R
Nowalk, Mary Patricia
Troy, Judith A
Sharp, Lisa K
Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web
title Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web
title_full Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web
title_fullStr Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web
title_full_unstemmed Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web
title_short Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web
title_sort vaccine criticism on the world wide web
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15998608
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7.2.e17
work_keys_str_mv AT zimmermanrichardk vaccinecriticismontheworldwideweb
AT wolferobertm vaccinecriticismontheworldwideweb
AT foxdwighte vaccinecriticismontheworldwideweb
AT foxjaker vaccinecriticismontheworldwideweb
AT nowalkmarypatricia vaccinecriticismontheworldwideweb
AT troyjuditha vaccinecriticismontheworldwideweb
AT sharplisak vaccinecriticismontheworldwideweb