Cargando…

What Is eHealth (6): Perspectives on the Evolution of eHealth Research

BACKGROUND: The field of eHealth holds promise for supporting and enabling health behavior change and the prevention and management of chronic disease. OBJECTIVE: In order to establish areas of congruence and controversy among contributors to the early development, evaluation, and dissemination of e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahern, David K, Kreslake, Jennifer M, Phalen, Judith M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Gunther Eysenbach 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16585029
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.1.e4
_version_ 1782129265126408192
author Ahern, David K
Kreslake, Jennifer M
Phalen, Judith M
author_facet Ahern, David K
Kreslake, Jennifer M
Phalen, Judith M
author_sort Ahern, David K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The field of eHealth holds promise for supporting and enabling health behavior change and the prevention and management of chronic disease. OBJECTIVE: In order to establish areas of congruence and controversy among contributors to the early development, evaluation, and dissemination of eHealth applications, as well as the desire to inform an evaluation research funding agenda, 38 semistructured, qualitative interviews were conducted among stakeholders in eHealth between May 2002 and September 2003. METHODS: Participants were asked about their perspectives on the credibility, value, and future potential of information technology for health behavior change and chronic disease management. Interviews were coded and analyzed for emergent themes using qualitative methods. RESULTS: Consistent themes were identified across stakeholder groups, with slight differences in emphasis. These topics included the following: (1) consensus and standardization—most stakeholders expressed a strong desire for a more coordinated, rigorous effort to define and integrate the field; (2) evaluation methods and challenges—demonstrating outcomes is required to establish eHealth quality and efficacy, but stakeholders were not satisfied with the sensitivity, validity, and reliability of existing outcome measures; (3) quality, value, and future potential—the intersection between eHealth’s potential cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and improved clinical status among users generated a high degree of interest; and (4) health disparities—many stakeholders contended that traditionally underserved populations will particularly benefit from eHealth applications, although others argued that the underserved are also disadvantaged in terms of access to technology. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations included the need for improvement and formalization of development and evaluation standards across private and public sectors, additional research on the technology needs and preferences of traditionally underserved populations, and long-term epidemiologic studies of the impact of eHealth on outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
format Text
id pubmed-1550694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Gunther Eysenbach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15506942006-10-13 What Is eHealth (6): Perspectives on the Evolution of eHealth Research Ahern, David K Kreslake, Jennifer M Phalen, Judith M J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The field of eHealth holds promise for supporting and enabling health behavior change and the prevention and management of chronic disease. OBJECTIVE: In order to establish areas of congruence and controversy among contributors to the early development, evaluation, and dissemination of eHealth applications, as well as the desire to inform an evaluation research funding agenda, 38 semistructured, qualitative interviews were conducted among stakeholders in eHealth between May 2002 and September 2003. METHODS: Participants were asked about their perspectives on the credibility, value, and future potential of information technology for health behavior change and chronic disease management. Interviews were coded and analyzed for emergent themes using qualitative methods. RESULTS: Consistent themes were identified across stakeholder groups, with slight differences in emphasis. These topics included the following: (1) consensus and standardization—most stakeholders expressed a strong desire for a more coordinated, rigorous effort to define and integrate the field; (2) evaluation methods and challenges—demonstrating outcomes is required to establish eHealth quality and efficacy, but stakeholders were not satisfied with the sensitivity, validity, and reliability of existing outcome measures; (3) quality, value, and future potential—the intersection between eHealth’s potential cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and improved clinical status among users generated a high degree of interest; and (4) health disparities—many stakeholders contended that traditionally underserved populations will particularly benefit from eHealth applications, although others argued that the underserved are also disadvantaged in terms of access to technology. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations included the need for improvement and formalization of development and evaluation standards across private and public sectors, additional research on the technology needs and preferences of traditionally underserved populations, and long-term epidemiologic studies of the impact of eHealth on outcomes and cost-effectiveness. Gunther Eysenbach 2006-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC1550694/ /pubmed/16585029 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.1.e4 Text en © David K Ahern, Jennifer M Kreslake, Judith M Phalen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 31.3.2006. Except where otherwise noted, articles published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, including full bibliographic details and the URL (see "please cite as" above), and this statement is included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ahern, David K
Kreslake, Jennifer M
Phalen, Judith M
What Is eHealth (6): Perspectives on the Evolution of eHealth Research
title What Is eHealth (6): Perspectives on the Evolution of eHealth Research
title_full What Is eHealth (6): Perspectives on the Evolution of eHealth Research
title_fullStr What Is eHealth (6): Perspectives on the Evolution of eHealth Research
title_full_unstemmed What Is eHealth (6): Perspectives on the Evolution of eHealth Research
title_short What Is eHealth (6): Perspectives on the Evolution of eHealth Research
title_sort what is ehealth (6): perspectives on the evolution of ehealth research
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16585029
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.1.e4
work_keys_str_mv AT aherndavidk whatisehealth6perspectivesontheevolutionofehealthresearch
AT kreslakejenniferm whatisehealth6perspectivesontheevolutionofehealthresearch
AT phalenjudithm whatisehealth6perspectivesontheevolutionofehealthresearch