Cargando…
Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine the adverse events and important prognostic factors associated with interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, HEALTHSTAR, and Web of Science (from...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3924 |
_version_ | 1782129274771210240 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Eddy MacDonald, Russell D Adhikari, Neill KJ Scales, Damon C Wax, Randy S Stewart, Thomas E Ferguson, Niall D |
author_facet | Fan, Eddy MacDonald, Russell D Adhikari, Neill KJ Scales, Damon C Wax, Randy S Stewart, Thomas E Ferguson, Niall D |
author_sort | Fan, Eddy |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine the adverse events and important prognostic factors associated with interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, HEALTHSTAR, and Web of Science (from inception until 10 January 2005) for all clinical studies describing the incidence and predictors of adverse events in intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients undergoing interfacility transport. The bibliographies of selected articles were also examined. RESULTS: Five studies (245 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All were case-series and two were prospective in design. Due to the paucity of studies and significant heterogeneity in study population, outcome events, and results, we synthesized data in a qualitative manner. Pre-transport severity of illness was reported in only one study. The most common indication for transport was a need for investigations and/or specialist care (three studies, 220 patients). Transport modalities included air (fixed or rotor wing; 66% of patients) and ground (31%) ambulance, and commercial aircraft (3%). Transport teams included a physician in three studies (220 patients). Death during transfer was rare (n = 1). No other adverse events or significant therapeutic interventions during transport were reported. One study reported a 19% (28/145) incidence of respiratory alkalosis on arrival and another study documented a 30% overall intensive care unit mortality, while no adverse events or outcomes were reported after arrival in the three other studies. CONCLUSION: Insufficient data exist to draw firm conclusions regarding the mortality, morbidity, or risk factors associated with the interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. Further study is required to define the risks and benefits of interfacility transfer in this patient population. Such information is important for the planning and allocation of resources related to transporting critically ill adults. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1550794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15507942006-08-22 Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review Fan, Eddy MacDonald, Russell D Adhikari, Neill KJ Scales, Damon C Wax, Randy S Stewart, Thomas E Ferguson, Niall D Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine the adverse events and important prognostic factors associated with interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, HEALTHSTAR, and Web of Science (from inception until 10 January 2005) for all clinical studies describing the incidence and predictors of adverse events in intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients undergoing interfacility transport. The bibliographies of selected articles were also examined. RESULTS: Five studies (245 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All were case-series and two were prospective in design. Due to the paucity of studies and significant heterogeneity in study population, outcome events, and results, we synthesized data in a qualitative manner. Pre-transport severity of illness was reported in only one study. The most common indication for transport was a need for investigations and/or specialist care (three studies, 220 patients). Transport modalities included air (fixed or rotor wing; 66% of patients) and ground (31%) ambulance, and commercial aircraft (3%). Transport teams included a physician in three studies (220 patients). Death during transfer was rare (n = 1). No other adverse events or significant therapeutic interventions during transport were reported. One study reported a 19% (28/145) incidence of respiratory alkalosis on arrival and another study documented a 30% overall intensive care unit mortality, while no adverse events or outcomes were reported after arrival in the three other studies. CONCLUSION: Insufficient data exist to draw firm conclusions regarding the mortality, morbidity, or risk factors associated with the interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. Further study is required to define the risks and benefits of interfacility transfer in this patient population. Such information is important for the planning and allocation of resources related to transporting critically ill adults. BioMed Central 2006 2005-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1550794/ /pubmed/16356212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3924 Text en Copyright © 2005 Fan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Fan, Eddy MacDonald, Russell D Adhikari, Neill KJ Scales, Damon C Wax, Randy S Stewart, Thomas E Ferguson, Niall D Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review |
title | Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review |
title_full | Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review |
title_short | Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review |
title_sort | outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faneddy outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview AT macdonaldrusselld outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview AT adhikarineillkj outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview AT scalesdamonc outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview AT waxrandys outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview AT stewartthomase outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview AT fergusonnialld outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview |