Cargando…

Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine the adverse events and important prognostic factors associated with interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, HEALTHSTAR, and Web of Science (from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Eddy, MacDonald, Russell D, Adhikari, Neill KJ, Scales, Damon C, Wax, Randy S, Stewart, Thomas E, Ferguson, Niall D
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3924
_version_ 1782129274771210240
author Fan, Eddy
MacDonald, Russell D
Adhikari, Neill KJ
Scales, Damon C
Wax, Randy S
Stewart, Thomas E
Ferguson, Niall D
author_facet Fan, Eddy
MacDonald, Russell D
Adhikari, Neill KJ
Scales, Damon C
Wax, Randy S
Stewart, Thomas E
Ferguson, Niall D
author_sort Fan, Eddy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine the adverse events and important prognostic factors associated with interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, HEALTHSTAR, and Web of Science (from inception until 10 January 2005) for all clinical studies describing the incidence and predictors of adverse events in intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients undergoing interfacility transport. The bibliographies of selected articles were also examined. RESULTS: Five studies (245 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All were case-series and two were prospective in design. Due to the paucity of studies and significant heterogeneity in study population, outcome events, and results, we synthesized data in a qualitative manner. Pre-transport severity of illness was reported in only one study. The most common indication for transport was a need for investigations and/or specialist care (three studies, 220 patients). Transport modalities included air (fixed or rotor wing; 66% of patients) and ground (31%) ambulance, and commercial aircraft (3%). Transport teams included a physician in three studies (220 patients). Death during transfer was rare (n = 1). No other adverse events or significant therapeutic interventions during transport were reported. One study reported a 19% (28/145) incidence of respiratory alkalosis on arrival and another study documented a 30% overall intensive care unit mortality, while no adverse events or outcomes were reported after arrival in the three other studies. CONCLUSION: Insufficient data exist to draw firm conclusions regarding the mortality, morbidity, or risk factors associated with the interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. Further study is required to define the risks and benefits of interfacility transfer in this patient population. Such information is important for the planning and allocation of resources related to transporting critically ill adults.
format Text
id pubmed-1550794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15507942006-08-22 Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review Fan, Eddy MacDonald, Russell D Adhikari, Neill KJ Scales, Damon C Wax, Randy S Stewart, Thomas E Ferguson, Niall D Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine the adverse events and important prognostic factors associated with interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, HEALTHSTAR, and Web of Science (from inception until 10 January 2005) for all clinical studies describing the incidence and predictors of adverse events in intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients undergoing interfacility transport. The bibliographies of selected articles were also examined. RESULTS: Five studies (245 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All were case-series and two were prospective in design. Due to the paucity of studies and significant heterogeneity in study population, outcome events, and results, we synthesized data in a qualitative manner. Pre-transport severity of illness was reported in only one study. The most common indication for transport was a need for investigations and/or specialist care (three studies, 220 patients). Transport modalities included air (fixed or rotor wing; 66% of patients) and ground (31%) ambulance, and commercial aircraft (3%). Transport teams included a physician in three studies (220 patients). Death during transfer was rare (n = 1). No other adverse events or significant therapeutic interventions during transport were reported. One study reported a 19% (28/145) incidence of respiratory alkalosis on arrival and another study documented a 30% overall intensive care unit mortality, while no adverse events or outcomes were reported after arrival in the three other studies. CONCLUSION: Insufficient data exist to draw firm conclusions regarding the mortality, morbidity, or risk factors associated with the interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients. Further study is required to define the risks and benefits of interfacility transfer in this patient population. Such information is important for the planning and allocation of resources related to transporting critically ill adults. BioMed Central 2006 2005-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1550794/ /pubmed/16356212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3924 Text en Copyright © 2005 Fan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Fan, Eddy
MacDonald, Russell D
Adhikari, Neill KJ
Scales, Damon C
Wax, Randy S
Stewart, Thomas E
Ferguson, Niall D
Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review
title Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review
title_full Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review
title_fullStr Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review
title_short Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review
title_sort outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3924
work_keys_str_mv AT faneddy outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview
AT macdonaldrusselld outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview
AT adhikarineillkj outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview
AT scalesdamonc outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview
AT waxrandys outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview
AT stewartthomase outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview
AT fergusonnialld outcomesofinterfacilitycriticalcareadultpatienttransportasystematicreview