Cargando…

Survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies

The preferred analysis for studies of mortality among patients treated in an intensive care unit should compare the proportions of patients who died during hospitalization. Studies that look for prognostic covariates should use logistic regression. Survival methods, such as the proportional hazards...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Schoenfeld, David
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16420653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3949
_version_ 1782129280821493760
author Schoenfeld, David
author_facet Schoenfeld, David
author_sort Schoenfeld, David
collection PubMed
description The preferred analysis for studies of mortality among patients treated in an intensive care unit should compare the proportions of patients who died during hospitalization. Studies that look for prognostic covariates should use logistic regression. Survival methods, such as the proportional hazards model, or methods based on competing risk analysis are not appropriate because prolonged survival among patients that die during their hospitalization does not benefit the patient and, therefore, should not be measured in the statistical analysis.
format Text
id pubmed-1550820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15508202006-08-22 Survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies Schoenfeld, David Crit Care Commentary The preferred analysis for studies of mortality among patients treated in an intensive care unit should compare the proportions of patients who died during hospitalization. Studies that look for prognostic covariates should use logistic regression. Survival methods, such as the proportional hazards model, or methods based on competing risk analysis are not appropriate because prolonged survival among patients that die during their hospitalization does not benefit the patient and, therefore, should not be measured in the statistical analysis. BioMed Central 2006 2005-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC1550820/ /pubmed/16420653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3949 Text en Copyright © 2005 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Schoenfeld, David
Survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies
title Survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies
title_full Survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies
title_fullStr Survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies
title_full_unstemmed Survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies
title_short Survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies
title_sort survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16420653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3949
work_keys_str_mv AT schoenfelddavid survivalmethodsincludingthoseusingcompetingriskanalysisarenotappropriateforintensivecareunitoutcomestudies