Cargando…

A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score is widely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) as a scoring system for research and clinical audit purposes. Physiological data for calculation of the APACHE II score are derived from the worst values in the first 24...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Kwok M, Dobb, Geoffrey J, Knuiman, Matthew, Finn, Judith, Lee, Kok Y, Webb, Steven AR
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3913
_version_ 1782129287343636480
author Ho, Kwok M
Dobb, Geoffrey J
Knuiman, Matthew
Finn, Judith
Lee, Kok Y
Webb, Steven AR
author_facet Ho, Kwok M
Dobb, Geoffrey J
Knuiman, Matthew
Finn, Judith
Lee, Kok Y
Webb, Steven AR
author_sort Ho, Kwok M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score is widely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) as a scoring system for research and clinical audit purposes. Physiological data for calculation of the APACHE II score are derived from the worst values in the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU. The collection of physiological data on admission only is probably logistically easier, and this approach is used by some ICUs. This study compares the performance of APACHE II scores calculated using admission data with those obtained from the worst values in the first 24 hours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from a tertiary ICU. There were no missing physiological data and follow-up for mortality was available for all patients in the database. The admission and the worst 24-hour physiological variables were used to generate the admission APACHE II score and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score, and the corresponding predicted mortality, respectively. RESULTS: There were 11,107 noncardiac surgery ICU admissions during 11 years from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2003. The mean admission and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score were 12.7 and 15.4, and the derived predicted mortality estimates were 15.5% and 19.3%, respectively. The actual hospital mortality was 16.3%. The overall discrimination ability, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, of the admission APACHE II model (83.8%, 95% confidence interval = 82.9–84.7) and the worst 24-hour APACHE II model (84.6%, 95% confidence interval = 83.7–85.5) was not significantly different (P = 1.00). CONCLUSION: Substitution of the worst 24-hour physiological variables with the admission physiological variables to calculate the admission APACHE II score maintains the overall discrimination ability of the traditional APACHE II model. The admission APACHE II model represents a potential alternative model to the worst 24-hour APACHE II model in critically ill nontrauma patients.
format Text
id pubmed-1550848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15508482006-08-22 A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study Ho, Kwok M Dobb, Geoffrey J Knuiman, Matthew Finn, Judith Lee, Kok Y Webb, Steven AR Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score is widely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) as a scoring system for research and clinical audit purposes. Physiological data for calculation of the APACHE II score are derived from the worst values in the first 24 hours after admission to the ICU. The collection of physiological data on admission only is probably logistically easier, and this approach is used by some ICUs. This study compares the performance of APACHE II scores calculated using admission data with those obtained from the worst values in the first 24 hours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from a tertiary ICU. There were no missing physiological data and follow-up for mortality was available for all patients in the database. The admission and the worst 24-hour physiological variables were used to generate the admission APACHE II score and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score, and the corresponding predicted mortality, respectively. RESULTS: There were 11,107 noncardiac surgery ICU admissions during 11 years from 1 January 1993 to 31 December 2003. The mean admission and the worst 24-hour APACHE II score were 12.7 and 15.4, and the derived predicted mortality estimates were 15.5% and 19.3%, respectively. The actual hospital mortality was 16.3%. The overall discrimination ability, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, of the admission APACHE II model (83.8%, 95% confidence interval = 82.9–84.7) and the worst 24-hour APACHE II model (84.6%, 95% confidence interval = 83.7–85.5) was not significantly different (P = 1.00). CONCLUSION: Substitution of the worst 24-hour physiological variables with the admission physiological variables to calculate the admission APACHE II score maintains the overall discrimination ability of the traditional APACHE II model. The admission APACHE II model represents a potential alternative model to the worst 24-hour APACHE II model in critically ill nontrauma patients. BioMed Central 2006 2005-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1550848/ /pubmed/16356207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3913 Text en Copyright © 2005 Ho et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ho, Kwok M
Dobb, Geoffrey J
Knuiman, Matthew
Finn, Judith
Lee, Kok Y
Webb, Steven AR
A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study
title A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study
title_full A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study
title_short A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort comparison of admission and worst 24-hour acute physiology and chronic health evaluation ii scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16356207
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3913
work_keys_str_mv AT hokwokm acomparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dobbgeoffreyj acomparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT knuimanmatthew acomparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT finnjudith acomparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT leekoky acomparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT webbstevenar acomparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hokwokm comparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dobbgeoffreyj comparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT knuimanmatthew comparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT finnjudith comparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT leekoky comparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT webbstevenar comparisonofadmissionandworst24houracutephysiologyandchronichealthevaluationiiscoresinpredictinghospitalmortalityaretrospectivecohortstudy