Cargando…
The distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: a cohort study
INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to describe the epidemiology, clinical profiles, outcomes, and factors that might predict progression of critically ill patients to chronically critically ill (CCI) patients, a still poorly characterized subgroup. METHODS: We prospectively studied all patients admitted to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16784546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc4941 |
_version_ | 1782129309025042432 |
---|---|
author | Estenssoro, Elisa Reina, Rosa Canales, Héctor S Saenz, María Gabriela Gonzalez, Francisco E Aprea, María M Laffaire, Enrique Gola, Victor Dubin, Arnaldo |
author_facet | Estenssoro, Elisa Reina, Rosa Canales, Héctor S Saenz, María Gabriela Gonzalez, Francisco E Aprea, María M Laffaire, Enrique Gola, Victor Dubin, Arnaldo |
author_sort | Estenssoro, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to describe the epidemiology, clinical profiles, outcomes, and factors that might predict progression of critically ill patients to chronically critically ill (CCI) patients, a still poorly characterized subgroup. METHODS: We prospectively studied all patients admitted to a university-affiliated hospital intensive care unit (ICU) between 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2005. On admission, we recorded epidemiological data, the presence of organ failure (multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS)), underlying diseases (McCabe score), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and shock. Daily, we recorded MODS, ARDS, shock, mechanical ventilation use, lengths of ICU and hospital stay (LOS), and outcome. CCI patients were defined as those having a tracheotomy placed for continued ventilation. Clinical complications and time to tracheal decannulation were registered. Predictors of progression to CCI were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (12%) fulfilled the CCI definition and, compared with the remaining 690 patients, these CCI patients were sicker (APACHE II, 21 ± 7 versus 18 ± 9 for non-CCI patients, p = 0.005); had more organ dysfunctions (SOFA 7 ± 3 versus 6 ± 4, p < 0.003); received more interventions (TISS 32 ± 10 versus 26 ± 8, p < 0.0001); and had less underlying diseases and had undergone emergency surgery more frequently (43 versus 24%, p = 0.001). ARDS and shock were present in 84% and 83% of CCI patients, respectively, versus 44% and 48% in the other patients (p < 0.0001 for both). CCI patients had higher expected mortality (38% versus 32%, p = 0.003), but observed mortality was similar (32% versus 35%, p = 0.59). Independent predictors of progression to CCI were ARDS on admission, APACHE II and McCabe scores (odds ratio (OR) 2.26, p < 0.001; OR 1.03, p < 0.01; and OR 0.34, p < 0.0001, respectively). Lengths of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital stay were 33 (24 to 50), 39 (29 to 55) and 55 (37 to 84) days, respectively. Tracheal decannulation was achieved at 40 ± 19 days. CONCLUSION: CCI patients were a severely ill population, in which ARDS, shock, and MODS were frequent on admission, and who suffered recurrent complications during their stay. However, their prognosis was equivalent to that of the other ICU patients. ARDS, APACHE II and McCabe scores were independent predictors of evolution to chronicity. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1550940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15509402006-08-22 The distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: a cohort study Estenssoro, Elisa Reina, Rosa Canales, Héctor S Saenz, María Gabriela Gonzalez, Francisco E Aprea, María M Laffaire, Enrique Gola, Victor Dubin, Arnaldo Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Our goal was to describe the epidemiology, clinical profiles, outcomes, and factors that might predict progression of critically ill patients to chronically critically ill (CCI) patients, a still poorly characterized subgroup. METHODS: We prospectively studied all patients admitted to a university-affiliated hospital intensive care unit (ICU) between 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2005. On admission, we recorded epidemiological data, the presence of organ failure (multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS)), underlying diseases (McCabe score), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and shock. Daily, we recorded MODS, ARDS, shock, mechanical ventilation use, lengths of ICU and hospital stay (LOS), and outcome. CCI patients were defined as those having a tracheotomy placed for continued ventilation. Clinical complications and time to tracheal decannulation were registered. Predictors of progression to CCI were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (12%) fulfilled the CCI definition and, compared with the remaining 690 patients, these CCI patients were sicker (APACHE II, 21 ± 7 versus 18 ± 9 for non-CCI patients, p = 0.005); had more organ dysfunctions (SOFA 7 ± 3 versus 6 ± 4, p < 0.003); received more interventions (TISS 32 ± 10 versus 26 ± 8, p < 0.0001); and had less underlying diseases and had undergone emergency surgery more frequently (43 versus 24%, p = 0.001). ARDS and shock were present in 84% and 83% of CCI patients, respectively, versus 44% and 48% in the other patients (p < 0.0001 for both). CCI patients had higher expected mortality (38% versus 32%, p = 0.003), but observed mortality was similar (32% versus 35%, p = 0.59). Independent predictors of progression to CCI were ARDS on admission, APACHE II and McCabe scores (odds ratio (OR) 2.26, p < 0.001; OR 1.03, p < 0.01; and OR 0.34, p < 0.0001, respectively). Lengths of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital stay were 33 (24 to 50), 39 (29 to 55) and 55 (37 to 84) days, respectively. Tracheal decannulation was achieved at 40 ± 19 days. CONCLUSION: CCI patients were a severely ill population, in which ARDS, shock, and MODS were frequent on admission, and who suffered recurrent complications during their stay. However, their prognosis was equivalent to that of the other ICU patients. ARDS, APACHE II and McCabe scores were independent predictors of evolution to chronicity. BioMed Central 2006 2006-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1550940/ /pubmed/16784546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc4941 Text en Copyright © 2006 Estenssoro et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Estenssoro, Elisa Reina, Rosa Canales, Héctor S Saenz, María Gabriela Gonzalez, Francisco E Aprea, María M Laffaire, Enrique Gola, Victor Dubin, Arnaldo The distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: a cohort study |
title | The distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: a cohort study |
title_full | The distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: a cohort study |
title_fullStr | The distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: a cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | The distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: a cohort study |
title_short | The distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: a cohort study |
title_sort | distinct clinical profile of chronically critically ill patients: a cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16784546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc4941 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT estenssoroelisa thedistinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT reinarosa thedistinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT canaleshectors thedistinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT saenzmariagabriela thedistinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT gonzalezfranciscoe thedistinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT apreamariam thedistinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT laffaireenrique thedistinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT golavictor thedistinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT dubinarnaldo thedistinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT estenssoroelisa distinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT reinarosa distinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT canaleshectors distinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT saenzmariagabriela distinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT gonzalezfranciscoe distinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT apreamariam distinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT laffaireenrique distinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT golavictor distinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy AT dubinarnaldo distinctclinicalprofileofchronicallycriticallyillpatientsacohortstudy |