Cargando…

Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report

At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development, a subcommittee of the Board of Scientific Counselors Executive Committee conducted an independent and open peer review of the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program (EDC Research Program) of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harding, Anna K., Daston, George P., Boyd, Glen R., Lucier, George W., Safe, Stephen H., Stewart, Juarine, Tillitt, Donald E., Van Der Kraak, Glen
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1552001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8875
_version_ 1782129326006730752
author Harding, Anna K.
Daston, George P.
Boyd, Glen R.
Lucier, George W.
Safe, Stephen H.
Stewart, Juarine
Tillitt, Donald E.
Van Der Kraak, Glen
author_facet Harding, Anna K.
Daston, George P.
Boyd, Glen R.
Lucier, George W.
Safe, Stephen H.
Stewart, Juarine
Tillitt, Donald E.
Van Der Kraak, Glen
author_sort Harding, Anna K.
collection PubMed
description At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development, a subcommittee of the Board of Scientific Counselors Executive Committee conducted an independent and open peer review of the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program (EDC Research Program) of the U.S. EPA. The subcommittee was charged with reviewing the design, relevance, progress, scientific leadership, and resources of the program. The subcommittee found that the long-term goals and science questions in the EDC Program are appropriate and represent an understandable and solid framework for setting research priorities, representing a combination of problem-driven and core research. Long-term goal (LTG) 1, dealing with the underlying science surrounding endocrine disruptors, provides a solid scientific foundation for conducting risk assessments and making risk management decisions. LTG 2, dealing with defining the extent of the impact of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), has shown greater progress on ecologic effects of EDCs compared with that on human health effects. LTG 3, which involves support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Program of the U.S. EPA, has two mammalian tests already through a validation program and soon available for use. Despite good progress, we recommend that the U.S. EPA a) strengthen their expertise in wildlife toxicology, b) expedite validation of the Endocrine Disruptors Screening and Testing Advisory Committee tests, c) continue dependable funding for the EDC Research Program, d) take a leadership role in the application of “omics” technologies to address many of the science questions critical for evaluating environmental and human health effects of EDCs, and e) continue to sponsor multidisciplinary intramural research and interagency collaborations.
format Text
id pubmed-1552001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15520012006-08-29 Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report Harding, Anna K. Daston, George P. Boyd, Glen R. Lucier, George W. Safe, Stephen H. Stewart, Juarine Tillitt, Donald E. Van Der Kraak, Glen Environ Health Perspect Research At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development, a subcommittee of the Board of Scientific Counselors Executive Committee conducted an independent and open peer review of the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program (EDC Research Program) of the U.S. EPA. The subcommittee was charged with reviewing the design, relevance, progress, scientific leadership, and resources of the program. The subcommittee found that the long-term goals and science questions in the EDC Program are appropriate and represent an understandable and solid framework for setting research priorities, representing a combination of problem-driven and core research. Long-term goal (LTG) 1, dealing with the underlying science surrounding endocrine disruptors, provides a solid scientific foundation for conducting risk assessments and making risk management decisions. LTG 2, dealing with defining the extent of the impact of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), has shown greater progress on ecologic effects of EDCs compared with that on human health effects. LTG 3, which involves support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Program of the U.S. EPA, has two mammalian tests already through a validation program and soon available for use. Despite good progress, we recommend that the U.S. EPA a) strengthen their expertise in wildlife toxicology, b) expedite validation of the Endocrine Disruptors Screening and Testing Advisory Committee tests, c) continue dependable funding for the EDC Research Program, d) take a leadership role in the application of “omics” technologies to address many of the science questions critical for evaluating environmental and human health effects of EDCs, and e) continue to sponsor multidisciplinary intramural research and interagency collaborations. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2006-08 2006-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1552001/ /pubmed/16882539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8875 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Harding, Anna K.
Daston, George P.
Boyd, Glen R.
Lucier, George W.
Safe, Stephen H.
Stewart, Juarine
Tillitt, Donald E.
Van Der Kraak, Glen
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report
title Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report
title_full Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report
title_fullStr Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report
title_full_unstemmed Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report
title_short Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report
title_sort endocrine disrupting chemicals research program of the u.s. environmental protection agency: summary of a peer-review report
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1552001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8875
work_keys_str_mv AT hardingannak endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport
AT dastongeorgep endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport
AT boydglenr endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport
AT luciergeorgew endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport
AT safestephenh endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport
AT stewartjuarine endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport
AT tillittdonalde endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport
AT vanderkraakglen endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport