Cargando…
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report
At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development, a subcommittee of the Board of Scientific Counselors Executive Committee conducted an independent and open peer review of the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program (EDC Research Program) of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1552001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8875 |
_version_ | 1782129326006730752 |
---|---|
author | Harding, Anna K. Daston, George P. Boyd, Glen R. Lucier, George W. Safe, Stephen H. Stewart, Juarine Tillitt, Donald E. Van Der Kraak, Glen |
author_facet | Harding, Anna K. Daston, George P. Boyd, Glen R. Lucier, George W. Safe, Stephen H. Stewart, Juarine Tillitt, Donald E. Van Der Kraak, Glen |
author_sort | Harding, Anna K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development, a subcommittee of the Board of Scientific Counselors Executive Committee conducted an independent and open peer review of the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program (EDC Research Program) of the U.S. EPA. The subcommittee was charged with reviewing the design, relevance, progress, scientific leadership, and resources of the program. The subcommittee found that the long-term goals and science questions in the EDC Program are appropriate and represent an understandable and solid framework for setting research priorities, representing a combination of problem-driven and core research. Long-term goal (LTG) 1, dealing with the underlying science surrounding endocrine disruptors, provides a solid scientific foundation for conducting risk assessments and making risk management decisions. LTG 2, dealing with defining the extent of the impact of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), has shown greater progress on ecologic effects of EDCs compared with that on human health effects. LTG 3, which involves support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Program of the U.S. EPA, has two mammalian tests already through a validation program and soon available for use. Despite good progress, we recommend that the U.S. EPA a) strengthen their expertise in wildlife toxicology, b) expedite validation of the Endocrine Disruptors Screening and Testing Advisory Committee tests, c) continue dependable funding for the EDC Research Program, d) take a leadership role in the application of “omics” technologies to address many of the science questions critical for evaluating environmental and human health effects of EDCs, and e) continue to sponsor multidisciplinary intramural research and interagency collaborations. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1552001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15520012006-08-29 Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report Harding, Anna K. Daston, George P. Boyd, Glen R. Lucier, George W. Safe, Stephen H. Stewart, Juarine Tillitt, Donald E. Van Der Kraak, Glen Environ Health Perspect Research At the request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development, a subcommittee of the Board of Scientific Counselors Executive Committee conducted an independent and open peer review of the Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program (EDC Research Program) of the U.S. EPA. The subcommittee was charged with reviewing the design, relevance, progress, scientific leadership, and resources of the program. The subcommittee found that the long-term goals and science questions in the EDC Program are appropriate and represent an understandable and solid framework for setting research priorities, representing a combination of problem-driven and core research. Long-term goal (LTG) 1, dealing with the underlying science surrounding endocrine disruptors, provides a solid scientific foundation for conducting risk assessments and making risk management decisions. LTG 2, dealing with defining the extent of the impact of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), has shown greater progress on ecologic effects of EDCs compared with that on human health effects. LTG 3, which involves support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Program of the U.S. EPA, has two mammalian tests already through a validation program and soon available for use. Despite good progress, we recommend that the U.S. EPA a) strengthen their expertise in wildlife toxicology, b) expedite validation of the Endocrine Disruptors Screening and Testing Advisory Committee tests, c) continue dependable funding for the EDC Research Program, d) take a leadership role in the application of “omics” technologies to address many of the science questions critical for evaluating environmental and human health effects of EDCs, and e) continue to sponsor multidisciplinary intramural research and interagency collaborations. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2006-08 2006-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1552001/ /pubmed/16882539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8875 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Research Harding, Anna K. Daston, George P. Boyd, Glen R. Lucier, George W. Safe, Stephen H. Stewart, Juarine Tillitt, Donald E. Van Der Kraak, Glen Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report |
title | Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report |
title_full | Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report |
title_fullStr | Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report |
title_full_unstemmed | Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report |
title_short | Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Research Program of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency: Summary of a Peer-Review Report |
title_sort | endocrine disrupting chemicals research program of the u.s. environmental
protection agency: summary of a peer-review report |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1552001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8875 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hardingannak endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport AT dastongeorgep endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport AT boydglenr endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport AT luciergeorgew endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport AT safestephenh endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport AT stewartjuarine endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport AT tillittdonalde endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport AT vanderkraakglen endocrinedisruptingchemicalsresearchprogramoftheusenvironmentalprotectionagencysummaryofapeerreviewreport |