Cargando…

Estimation of Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and Soil-Like Materials Using Young Swine

In this article we summarize the results of a series of studies that measured the relative bioavailability (RBA) of lead in a variety of soil and soil-like test materials. Reference material (Pb acetate) or Pb-contaminated soils were administered orally to juvenile swine twice a day for 15 days. Blo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casteel, Stan W., Weis, Christopher P., Henningsen, Gerry M., Brattin, William J.
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1552028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8852
_version_ 1782129332383121408
author Casteel, Stan W.
Weis, Christopher P.
Henningsen, Gerry M.
Brattin, William J.
author_facet Casteel, Stan W.
Weis, Christopher P.
Henningsen, Gerry M.
Brattin, William J.
author_sort Casteel, Stan W.
collection PubMed
description In this article we summarize the results of a series of studies that measured the relative bioavailability (RBA) of lead in a variety of soil and soil-like test materials. Reference material (Pb acetate) or Pb-contaminated soils were administered orally to juvenile swine twice a day for 15 days. Blood samples were collected from each animal at multiple times during the course of the study, and samples of liver, kidney, and bone were collected at sacrifice. All samples were analyzed for Pb. We estimated the RBA of a test material by fitting mathematical models to the dose–response curves for each measurement end point and finding the ratio of doses that gave equal responses. The final RBA for a test material is the simple average of the four end point–specific RBA values. Results from 19 different test materials reveal a wide range of RBA values across different exposure materials, ranging from 6 to 105%. This variability in RBA between different samples highlights the importance of reliable RBA data to help improve risk assessments for Pb in soil. Although the RBA value for a sample depends on the relative amounts of the different chemical and physical forms of Pb present, data are not yet adequate to allow reliable quantitative predictions of RBA from chemical speciation data alone.
format Text
id pubmed-1552028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15520282006-08-29 Estimation of Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and Soil-Like Materials Using Young Swine Casteel, Stan W. Weis, Christopher P. Henningsen, Gerry M. Brattin, William J. Environ Health Perspect Research In this article we summarize the results of a series of studies that measured the relative bioavailability (RBA) of lead in a variety of soil and soil-like test materials. Reference material (Pb acetate) or Pb-contaminated soils were administered orally to juvenile swine twice a day for 15 days. Blood samples were collected from each animal at multiple times during the course of the study, and samples of liver, kidney, and bone were collected at sacrifice. All samples were analyzed for Pb. We estimated the RBA of a test material by fitting mathematical models to the dose–response curves for each measurement end point and finding the ratio of doses that gave equal responses. The final RBA for a test material is the simple average of the four end point–specific RBA values. Results from 19 different test materials reveal a wide range of RBA values across different exposure materials, ranging from 6 to 105%. This variability in RBA between different samples highlights the importance of reliable RBA data to help improve risk assessments for Pb in soil. Although the RBA value for a sample depends on the relative amounts of the different chemical and physical forms of Pb present, data are not yet adequate to allow reliable quantitative predictions of RBA from chemical speciation data alone. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2006-08 2006-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1552028/ /pubmed/16882520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8852 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Casteel, Stan W.
Weis, Christopher P.
Henningsen, Gerry M.
Brattin, William J.
Estimation of Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and Soil-Like Materials Using Young Swine
title Estimation of Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and Soil-Like Materials Using Young Swine
title_full Estimation of Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and Soil-Like Materials Using Young Swine
title_fullStr Estimation of Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and Soil-Like Materials Using Young Swine
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and Soil-Like Materials Using Young Swine
title_short Estimation of Relative Bioavailability of Lead in Soil and Soil-Like Materials Using Young Swine
title_sort estimation of relative bioavailability of lead in soil and soil-like materials using young swine
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1552028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16882520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8852
work_keys_str_mv AT casteelstanw estimationofrelativebioavailabilityofleadinsoilandsoillikematerialsusingyoungswine
AT weischristopherp estimationofrelativebioavailabilityofleadinsoilandsoillikematerialsusingyoungswine
AT henningsengerrym estimationofrelativebioavailabilityofleadinsoilandsoillikematerialsusingyoungswine
AT brattinwilliamj estimationofrelativebioavailabilityofleadinsoilandsoillikematerialsusingyoungswine