Cargando…

Combining partial liver resection and local ablation of liver tumours: a preliminary Dutch experience

BACKGROUND: The combination of partial liver resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a novel concept in the treatment of unresectable liver malignancies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of this combined strategy in the Netherlands. METHODS: Thirty-five patients treated with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fioole, Bram, Jansen, Maarten C, van Duijnhoven, Frederieke H, van Hillegersberg, Richard, van Gulik, Thomas M, Borel Rinkes, Inne HM
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1553444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16846515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-4-46
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The combination of partial liver resection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a novel concept in the treatment of unresectable liver malignancies. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of this combined strategy in the Netherlands. METHODS: Thirty-five patients treated with a combination of partial liver resection and RFA were identified from a prospectively registered pooled multicentre database. All patients were operated between June 1999 and November 2003 in 8 medical centres in the Netherlands. Main outcome parameters were morbidity, mortality, local success rate, and survival. RESULTS: Thirty-seven operations were performed in 35 patients. The group consisted of 20 male and 15 female patients with a median age of 59 years (range 41–76). Seventy-six lesions were resected and RFA was performed to ablate 82 unresectable liver tumours. Twelve patients developed a total of 24 complications, resulting in an overall perioperative morbidity rate of 32%. In two patients major complications resulted in postoperative death (postoperative mortality rate 5.4%). Local success rate after RFA was 88% and the estimated 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 84%, 70% and 43%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This strategy should only be performed following strict patient selection and within the context of prospective clinical trials.