Cargando…
The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics
Ion channels are the building blocks of the information processing capability of neurons: any realistic computational model of a neuron must include reliable and effective ion channel components. Sophisticated statistical and computational tools have been developed to study the ion channel structure...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1553477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16933979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020091 |
_version_ | 1782129355352178688 |
---|---|
author | Cannon, Robert C D'Alessandro, Giampaolo |
author_facet | Cannon, Robert C D'Alessandro, Giampaolo |
author_sort | Cannon, Robert C |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ion channels are the building blocks of the information processing capability of neurons: any realistic computational model of a neuron must include reliable and effective ion channel components. Sophisticated statistical and computational tools have been developed to study the ion channel structure–function relationship, but this work is rarely incorporated into the models used for single neurons or small networks. The disjunction is partly a matter of convention. Structure–function studies typically use a single Markov model for the whole channel whereas until recently whole-cell modeling software has focused on serial, independent, two-state subunits that can be represented by the Hodgkin–Huxley equations. More fundamentally, there is a difference in purpose that prevents models being easily reused. Biophysical models are typically developed to study one particular aspect of channel gating in detail, whereas neural modelers require broad coverage of the entire range of channel behavior that is often best achieved with approximate representations that omit structural features that cannot be adequately constrained. To bridge the gap so that more recent channel data can be used in neural models requires new computational infrastructure for bringing together diverse sources of data to arrive at best-fit models for whole-cell modeling. We review the current state of channel modeling and explore the developments needed for its conclusions to be integrated into whole-cell modeling. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1553477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15534772006-09-05 The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics Cannon, Robert C D'Alessandro, Giampaolo PLoS Comput Biol Review Ion channels are the building blocks of the information processing capability of neurons: any realistic computational model of a neuron must include reliable and effective ion channel components. Sophisticated statistical and computational tools have been developed to study the ion channel structure–function relationship, but this work is rarely incorporated into the models used for single neurons or small networks. The disjunction is partly a matter of convention. Structure–function studies typically use a single Markov model for the whole channel whereas until recently whole-cell modeling software has focused on serial, independent, two-state subunits that can be represented by the Hodgkin–Huxley equations. More fundamentally, there is a difference in purpose that prevents models being easily reused. Biophysical models are typically developed to study one particular aspect of channel gating in detail, whereas neural modelers require broad coverage of the entire range of channel behavior that is often best achieved with approximate representations that omit structural features that cannot be adequately constrained. To bridge the gap so that more recent channel data can be used in neural models requires new computational infrastructure for bringing together diverse sources of data to arrive at best-fit models for whole-cell modeling. We review the current state of channel modeling and explore the developments needed for its conclusions to be integrated into whole-cell modeling. Public Library of Science 2006-08 2006-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1553477/ /pubmed/16933979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020091 Text en © 2006 Cannon and D'Alessandro. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Cannon, Robert C D'Alessandro, Giampaolo The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics |
title | The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics |
title_full | The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics |
title_fullStr | The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics |
title_full_unstemmed | The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics |
title_short | The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics |
title_sort | ion channel inverse problem: neuroinformatics meets biophysics |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1553477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16933979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cannonrobertc theionchannelinverseproblemneuroinformaticsmeetsbiophysics AT dalessandrogiampaolo theionchannelinverseproblemneuroinformaticsmeetsbiophysics AT cannonrobertc ionchannelinverseproblemneuroinformaticsmeetsbiophysics AT dalessandrogiampaolo ionchannelinverseproblemneuroinformaticsmeetsbiophysics |