Cargando…

The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics

Ion channels are the building blocks of the information processing capability of neurons: any realistic computational model of a neuron must include reliable and effective ion channel components. Sophisticated statistical and computational tools have been developed to study the ion channel structure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cannon, Robert C, D'Alessandro, Giampaolo
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1553477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16933979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020091
_version_ 1782129355352178688
author Cannon, Robert C
D'Alessandro, Giampaolo
author_facet Cannon, Robert C
D'Alessandro, Giampaolo
author_sort Cannon, Robert C
collection PubMed
description Ion channels are the building blocks of the information processing capability of neurons: any realistic computational model of a neuron must include reliable and effective ion channel components. Sophisticated statistical and computational tools have been developed to study the ion channel structure–function relationship, but this work is rarely incorporated into the models used for single neurons or small networks. The disjunction is partly a matter of convention. Structure–function studies typically use a single Markov model for the whole channel whereas until recently whole-cell modeling software has focused on serial, independent, two-state subunits that can be represented by the Hodgkin–Huxley equations. More fundamentally, there is a difference in purpose that prevents models being easily reused. Biophysical models are typically developed to study one particular aspect of channel gating in detail, whereas neural modelers require broad coverage of the entire range of channel behavior that is often best achieved with approximate representations that omit structural features that cannot be adequately constrained. To bridge the gap so that more recent channel data can be used in neural models requires new computational infrastructure for bringing together diverse sources of data to arrive at best-fit models for whole-cell modeling. We review the current state of channel modeling and explore the developments needed for its conclusions to be integrated into whole-cell modeling.
format Text
id pubmed-1553477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15534772006-09-05 The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics Cannon, Robert C D'Alessandro, Giampaolo PLoS Comput Biol Review Ion channels are the building blocks of the information processing capability of neurons: any realistic computational model of a neuron must include reliable and effective ion channel components. Sophisticated statistical and computational tools have been developed to study the ion channel structure–function relationship, but this work is rarely incorporated into the models used for single neurons or small networks. The disjunction is partly a matter of convention. Structure–function studies typically use a single Markov model for the whole channel whereas until recently whole-cell modeling software has focused on serial, independent, two-state subunits that can be represented by the Hodgkin–Huxley equations. More fundamentally, there is a difference in purpose that prevents models being easily reused. Biophysical models are typically developed to study one particular aspect of channel gating in detail, whereas neural modelers require broad coverage of the entire range of channel behavior that is often best achieved with approximate representations that omit structural features that cannot be adequately constrained. To bridge the gap so that more recent channel data can be used in neural models requires new computational infrastructure for bringing together diverse sources of data to arrive at best-fit models for whole-cell modeling. We review the current state of channel modeling and explore the developments needed for its conclusions to be integrated into whole-cell modeling. Public Library of Science 2006-08 2006-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC1553477/ /pubmed/16933979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020091 Text en © 2006 Cannon and D'Alessandro. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Review
Cannon, Robert C
D'Alessandro, Giampaolo
The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics
title The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics
title_full The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics
title_fullStr The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics
title_full_unstemmed The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics
title_short The Ion Channel Inverse Problem: Neuroinformatics Meets Biophysics
title_sort ion channel inverse problem: neuroinformatics meets biophysics
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1553477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16933979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020091
work_keys_str_mv AT cannonrobertc theionchannelinverseproblemneuroinformaticsmeetsbiophysics
AT dalessandrogiampaolo theionchannelinverseproblemneuroinformaticsmeetsbiophysics
AT cannonrobertc ionchannelinverseproblemneuroinformaticsmeetsbiophysics
AT dalessandrogiampaolo ionchannelinverseproblemneuroinformaticsmeetsbiophysics