Cargando…
Cluster analysis for DNA methylation profiles having a detection threshold
BACKGROUND: DNA methylation, a molecular feature used to investigate tumor heterogeneity, can be measured on many genomic regions using the MethyLight technology. Due to the combination of the underlying biology of DNA methylation and the MethyLight technology, the measurements, while being generate...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1555616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16872497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-361 |
_version_ | 1782129367356276736 |
---|---|
author | Marjoram, Paul Chang, Jing Laird, Peter W Siegmund, Kimberly D |
author_facet | Marjoram, Paul Chang, Jing Laird, Peter W Siegmund, Kimberly D |
author_sort | Marjoram, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: DNA methylation, a molecular feature used to investigate tumor heterogeneity, can be measured on many genomic regions using the MethyLight technology. Due to the combination of the underlying biology of DNA methylation and the MethyLight technology, the measurements, while being generated on a continuous scale, have a large number of 0 values. This suggests that conventional clustering methodology may not perform well on this data. RESULTS: We compare performance of existing methodology (such as k-means) with two novel methods that explicitly allow for the preponderance of values at 0. We also consider how the ability to successfully cluster such data depends upon the number of informative genes for which methylation is measured and the correlation structure of the methylation values for those genes. We show that when data is collected for a sufficient number of genes, our models do improve clustering performance compared to methods, such as k-means, that do not explicitly respect the supposed biological realities of the situation. CONCLUSION: The performance of analysis methods depends upon how well the assumptions of those methods reflect the properties of the data being analyzed. Differing technologies will lead to data with differing properties, and should therefore be analyzed differently. Consequently, it is prudent to give thought to what the properties of the data are likely to be, and which analysis method might therefore be likely to best capture those properties. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1555616 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15556162006-08-26 Cluster analysis for DNA methylation profiles having a detection threshold Marjoram, Paul Chang, Jing Laird, Peter W Siegmund, Kimberly D BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: DNA methylation, a molecular feature used to investigate tumor heterogeneity, can be measured on many genomic regions using the MethyLight technology. Due to the combination of the underlying biology of DNA methylation and the MethyLight technology, the measurements, while being generated on a continuous scale, have a large number of 0 values. This suggests that conventional clustering methodology may not perform well on this data. RESULTS: We compare performance of existing methodology (such as k-means) with two novel methods that explicitly allow for the preponderance of values at 0. We also consider how the ability to successfully cluster such data depends upon the number of informative genes for which methylation is measured and the correlation structure of the methylation values for those genes. We show that when data is collected for a sufficient number of genes, our models do improve clustering performance compared to methods, such as k-means, that do not explicitly respect the supposed biological realities of the situation. CONCLUSION: The performance of analysis methods depends upon how well the assumptions of those methods reflect the properties of the data being analyzed. Differing technologies will lead to data with differing properties, and should therefore be analyzed differently. Consequently, it is prudent to give thought to what the properties of the data are likely to be, and which analysis method might therefore be likely to best capture those properties. BioMed Central 2006-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC1555616/ /pubmed/16872497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-361 Text en Copyright © 2006 Marjoram et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Marjoram, Paul Chang, Jing Laird, Peter W Siegmund, Kimberly D Cluster analysis for DNA methylation profiles having a detection threshold |
title | Cluster analysis for DNA methylation profiles having a detection threshold |
title_full | Cluster analysis for DNA methylation profiles having a detection threshold |
title_fullStr | Cluster analysis for DNA methylation profiles having a detection threshold |
title_full_unstemmed | Cluster analysis for DNA methylation profiles having a detection threshold |
title_short | Cluster analysis for DNA methylation profiles having a detection threshold |
title_sort | cluster analysis for dna methylation profiles having a detection threshold |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1555616/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16872497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-361 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marjorampaul clusteranalysisfordnamethylationprofileshavingadetectionthreshold AT changjing clusteranalysisfordnamethylationprofileshavingadetectionthreshold AT lairdpeterw clusteranalysisfordnamethylationprofileshavingadetectionthreshold AT siegmundkimberlyd clusteranalysisfordnamethylationprofileshavingadetectionthreshold |