Cargando…
Place-of-residence errors on death certificates for two contiguous U. S. counties
BACKGROUND: Based on death certificate data, the Texas Department of Health Bureau of Vital Statistics calculates age adjusted all-cause mortality rates for each Texas county yearly. In 1998 the calculated rates for two adjacent Texas counties was disparate. These counties contain one city (Amarillo...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1557538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16800881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-4-6 |
_version_ | 1782129388173656064 |
---|---|
author | Pierce, J Rush Denison, Anne V |
author_facet | Pierce, J Rush Denison, Anne V |
author_sort | Pierce, J Rush |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Based on death certificate data, the Texas Department of Health Bureau of Vital Statistics calculates age adjusted all-cause mortality rates for each Texas county yearly. In 1998 the calculated rates for two adjacent Texas counties was disparate. These counties contain one city (Amarillo) and are identical in size. This study examined the accuracy of recorded county of residence for deaths in the two counties in 1998. In our jurisdiction, the county of residence is assigned by funeral homes. METHODS: A random sample of 20% of death certificates was selected. The accuracy of the county of residence was verified by using a large area map, Tax Appraisal District records, and U.S. Census Bureau databases. Inaccuracies in recording the county or zip code of residence was recorded. RESULTS: Eighteen of 354 (5.4%) death certificates recorded the incorrect county and 21 of 354 (5.9%) of death certificates recorded the zip code improperly. There was a 14.4% county recording error rate for one county compared to a 0.82% for the other county. The zip code error rate was similar for the two counties (5.9% vs. 5.8%). Of the county errors, 83% occurred for addresses within a zip code that contained addresses in both counties. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a large error rate (14%) in recording county of residence for deaths in one county. A similar rate was not seen in an adjacent county. This led to significant miscalculation of mortality rates for two counties. We believe that errors may have arisen in part from use of internet programs by funeral homes to assign the county of residence. With some of these programs, the county is determined by zip code, and when a zip code straddles two counties, the program automatically assigns the county whose name appears first in the alphabet. This type of error could be avoided if funeral homes determined the county of residence from Tax Appraisal District or Census Bureau records, both of which are available on the internet. This type of error could also be avoided if vital statistics offices verified the county and zip code of residence using official sources. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1557538 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15575382006-08-30 Place-of-residence errors on death certificates for two contiguous U. S. counties Pierce, J Rush Denison, Anne V Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: Based on death certificate data, the Texas Department of Health Bureau of Vital Statistics calculates age adjusted all-cause mortality rates for each Texas county yearly. In 1998 the calculated rates for two adjacent Texas counties was disparate. These counties contain one city (Amarillo) and are identical in size. This study examined the accuracy of recorded county of residence for deaths in the two counties in 1998. In our jurisdiction, the county of residence is assigned by funeral homes. METHODS: A random sample of 20% of death certificates was selected. The accuracy of the county of residence was verified by using a large area map, Tax Appraisal District records, and U.S. Census Bureau databases. Inaccuracies in recording the county or zip code of residence was recorded. RESULTS: Eighteen of 354 (5.4%) death certificates recorded the incorrect county and 21 of 354 (5.9%) of death certificates recorded the zip code improperly. There was a 14.4% county recording error rate for one county compared to a 0.82% for the other county. The zip code error rate was similar for the two counties (5.9% vs. 5.8%). Of the county errors, 83% occurred for addresses within a zip code that contained addresses in both counties. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a large error rate (14%) in recording county of residence for deaths in one county. A similar rate was not seen in an adjacent county. This led to significant miscalculation of mortality rates for two counties. We believe that errors may have arisen in part from use of internet programs by funeral homes to assign the county of residence. With some of these programs, the county is determined by zip code, and when a zip code straddles two counties, the program automatically assigns the county whose name appears first in the alphabet. This type of error could be avoided if funeral homes determined the county of residence from Tax Appraisal District or Census Bureau records, both of which are available on the internet. This type of error could also be avoided if vital statistics offices verified the county and zip code of residence using official sources. BioMed Central 2006-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC1557538/ /pubmed/16800881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-4-6 Text en Copyright © 2006 Pierce and Denison; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Pierce, J Rush Denison, Anne V Place-of-residence errors on death certificates for two contiguous U. S. counties |
title | Place-of-residence errors on death certificates for two contiguous U. S. counties |
title_full | Place-of-residence errors on death certificates for two contiguous U. S. counties |
title_fullStr | Place-of-residence errors on death certificates for two contiguous U. S. counties |
title_full_unstemmed | Place-of-residence errors on death certificates for two contiguous U. S. counties |
title_short | Place-of-residence errors on death certificates for two contiguous U. S. counties |
title_sort | place-of-residence errors on death certificates for two contiguous u. s. counties |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1557538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16800881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-4-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piercejrush placeofresidenceerrorsondeathcertificatesfortwocontiguoususcounties AT denisonannev placeofresidenceerrorsondeathcertificatesfortwocontiguoususcounties |