Cargando…

The effect of the stromal component of breast tumours on prediction of clinical outcome using gene expression microarray analysis

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the cellular composition of biopsies on the error rates of multigene predictors of response of breast tumours to neoadjuvant adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Core biopsies were taken from primar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cleator, Susan J, Powles, Trevor J, Dexter, Tim, Fulford, Laura, Mackay, Alan, Smith, Ian E, Valgeirsson, Haukur, Ashworth, Alan, Dowsett, Mitch
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1557729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16790077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1506
_version_ 1782129398986571776
author Cleator, Susan J
Powles, Trevor J
Dexter, Tim
Fulford, Laura
Mackay, Alan
Smith, Ian E
Valgeirsson, Haukur
Ashworth, Alan
Dowsett, Mitch
author_facet Cleator, Susan J
Powles, Trevor J
Dexter, Tim
Fulford, Laura
Mackay, Alan
Smith, Ian E
Valgeirsson, Haukur
Ashworth, Alan
Dowsett, Mitch
author_sort Cleator, Susan J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the cellular composition of biopsies on the error rates of multigene predictors of response of breast tumours to neoadjuvant adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Core biopsies were taken from primary breast tumours of 43 patients prior to AC, and subsequent clinical response was recorded. Post-chemotherapy (day 21) samples were available for 16 of these samples. Frozen sections of each core were used to estimate the proportion of invasive cancer and other tissue components at three levels. Transcriptional profiling was performed using a cDNA array containing 4,600 elements. RESULTS: Twenty-three (53%) patients demonstrated a 'good' and 20 (47%) a 'poor' clinical response. The percentage invasive tumour in core biopsies collected from these patients varied markedly. Despite this, agglomerative clustering of sample expression profiles showed that almost all biopsies from the same tumour aggregated as nearest neighbours. SAM (significance analysis of microarrays) regression analysis identified 144 genes which distinguished high- and low-percentage invasive tumour biopsies at a false discovery rate of not more than 5%. The misclassification error of prediction of clinical response using microarray data from pre-treatment biopsies (on leave-one-out cross-validation) was 28%. When prediction was performed on subsets of samples which were more homogeneous in their proportions of malignant and stromal cells, the misclassification error was considerably lower (8%–13%, p < 0.05 on permutation). CONCLUSION: The non-tumour content of breast cancer samples has a significant effect on gene expression profiles. Consideration of this factor improves accuracy of response prediction by expression array profiling. Future gene expression array prediction studies should be planned taking this into account.
format Text
id pubmed-1557729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15577292006-09-01 The effect of the stromal component of breast tumours on prediction of clinical outcome using gene expression microarray analysis Cleator, Susan J Powles, Trevor J Dexter, Tim Fulford, Laura Mackay, Alan Smith, Ian E Valgeirsson, Haukur Ashworth, Alan Dowsett, Mitch Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the cellular composition of biopsies on the error rates of multigene predictors of response of breast tumours to neoadjuvant adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Core biopsies were taken from primary breast tumours of 43 patients prior to AC, and subsequent clinical response was recorded. Post-chemotherapy (day 21) samples were available for 16 of these samples. Frozen sections of each core were used to estimate the proportion of invasive cancer and other tissue components at three levels. Transcriptional profiling was performed using a cDNA array containing 4,600 elements. RESULTS: Twenty-three (53%) patients demonstrated a 'good' and 20 (47%) a 'poor' clinical response. The percentage invasive tumour in core biopsies collected from these patients varied markedly. Despite this, agglomerative clustering of sample expression profiles showed that almost all biopsies from the same tumour aggregated as nearest neighbours. SAM (significance analysis of microarrays) regression analysis identified 144 genes which distinguished high- and low-percentage invasive tumour biopsies at a false discovery rate of not more than 5%. The misclassification error of prediction of clinical response using microarray data from pre-treatment biopsies (on leave-one-out cross-validation) was 28%. When prediction was performed on subsets of samples which were more homogeneous in their proportions of malignant and stromal cells, the misclassification error was considerably lower (8%–13%, p < 0.05 on permutation). CONCLUSION: The non-tumour content of breast cancer samples has a significant effect on gene expression profiles. Consideration of this factor improves accuracy of response prediction by expression array profiling. Future gene expression array prediction studies should be planned taking this into account. BioMed Central 2006 2006-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC1557729/ /pubmed/16790077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1506 Text en Copyright © 2006 Cleator et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cleator, Susan J
Powles, Trevor J
Dexter, Tim
Fulford, Laura
Mackay, Alan
Smith, Ian E
Valgeirsson, Haukur
Ashworth, Alan
Dowsett, Mitch
The effect of the stromal component of breast tumours on prediction of clinical outcome using gene expression microarray analysis
title The effect of the stromal component of breast tumours on prediction of clinical outcome using gene expression microarray analysis
title_full The effect of the stromal component of breast tumours on prediction of clinical outcome using gene expression microarray analysis
title_fullStr The effect of the stromal component of breast tumours on prediction of clinical outcome using gene expression microarray analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effect of the stromal component of breast tumours on prediction of clinical outcome using gene expression microarray analysis
title_short The effect of the stromal component of breast tumours on prediction of clinical outcome using gene expression microarray analysis
title_sort effect of the stromal component of breast tumours on prediction of clinical outcome using gene expression microarray analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1557729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16790077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr1506
work_keys_str_mv AT cleatorsusanj theeffectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT powlestrevorj theeffectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT dextertim theeffectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT fulfordlaura theeffectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT mackayalan theeffectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT smithiane theeffectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT valgeirssonhaukur theeffectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT ashworthalan theeffectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT dowsettmitch theeffectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT cleatorsusanj effectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT powlestrevorj effectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT dextertim effectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT fulfordlaura effectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT mackayalan effectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT smithiane effectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT valgeirssonhaukur effectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT ashworthalan effectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis
AT dowsettmitch effectofthestromalcomponentofbreasttumoursonpredictionofclinicaloutcomeusinggeneexpressionmicroarrayanalysis