Cargando…

Comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize lines

BACKGROUND: There are thousands of maize lines with distinctive normal as well as mutant phenotypes. To determine the validity of comparisons among mutants in different lines, we first address the question of how similar the transcriptomes are in three standard lines at four developmental stages. RE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Jiong, Morrow, Darren J, Fernandes, John, Walbot, Virginia
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1557758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16542496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-3-r22
_version_ 1782129405990010880
author Ma, Jiong
Morrow, Darren J
Fernandes, John
Walbot, Virginia
author_facet Ma, Jiong
Morrow, Darren J
Fernandes, John
Walbot, Virginia
author_sort Ma, Jiong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are thousands of maize lines with distinctive normal as well as mutant phenotypes. To determine the validity of comparisons among mutants in different lines, we first address the question of how similar the transcriptomes are in three standard lines at four developmental stages. RESULTS: Four tissues (leaves, 1 mm anthers, 1.5 mm anthers, pollen) from one hybrid and one inbred maize line were hybridized with the W23 inbred on Agilent oligonucleotide microarrays with 21,000 elements. Tissue-specific gene expression patterns were documented, with leaves having the most tissue-specific transcripts. Haploid pollen expresses about half as many genes as the other samples. High overlap of gene expression was found between leaves and anthers. Anther and pollen transcript expression showed high conservation among the three lines while leaves had more divergence. Antisense transcripts represented about 6 to 14 percent of total transcriptome by tissue type but were similar across lines. Gene Ontology (GO) annotations were assigned and tabulated. Enrichment in GO terms related to cell-cycle functions was found for the identified antisense transcripts. Microarray results were validated via quantitative real-time PCR and by hybridization to a second oligonucleotide microarray platform. CONCLUSION: Despite high polymorphisms and structural differences among maize inbred lines, the transcriptomes of the three lines displayed remarkable similarities, especially in both reproductive samples (anther and pollen). We also identified potential stage markers for maize anther development. A large number of antisense transcripts were detected and implicated in important biological functions given the enrichment of particular GO classes.
format Text
id pubmed-1557758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15577582006-09-01 Comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize lines Ma, Jiong Morrow, Darren J Fernandes, John Walbot, Virginia Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: There are thousands of maize lines with distinctive normal as well as mutant phenotypes. To determine the validity of comparisons among mutants in different lines, we first address the question of how similar the transcriptomes are in three standard lines at four developmental stages. RESULTS: Four tissues (leaves, 1 mm anthers, 1.5 mm anthers, pollen) from one hybrid and one inbred maize line were hybridized with the W23 inbred on Agilent oligonucleotide microarrays with 21,000 elements. Tissue-specific gene expression patterns were documented, with leaves having the most tissue-specific transcripts. Haploid pollen expresses about half as many genes as the other samples. High overlap of gene expression was found between leaves and anthers. Anther and pollen transcript expression showed high conservation among the three lines while leaves had more divergence. Antisense transcripts represented about 6 to 14 percent of total transcriptome by tissue type but were similar across lines. Gene Ontology (GO) annotations were assigned and tabulated. Enrichment in GO terms related to cell-cycle functions was found for the identified antisense transcripts. Microarray results were validated via quantitative real-time PCR and by hybridization to a second oligonucleotide microarray platform. CONCLUSION: Despite high polymorphisms and structural differences among maize inbred lines, the transcriptomes of the three lines displayed remarkable similarities, especially in both reproductive samples (anther and pollen). We also identified potential stage markers for maize anther development. A large number of antisense transcripts were detected and implicated in important biological functions given the enrichment of particular GO classes. BioMed Central 2006 2006-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC1557758/ /pubmed/16542496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-3-r22 Text en Copyright © 2006 Ma et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ma, Jiong
Morrow, Darren J
Fernandes, John
Walbot, Virginia
Comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize lines
title Comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize lines
title_full Comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize lines
title_fullStr Comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize lines
title_full_unstemmed Comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize lines
title_short Comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize lines
title_sort comparative profiling of the sense and antisense transcriptome of maize lines
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1557758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16542496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-3-r22
work_keys_str_mv AT majiong comparativeprofilingofthesenseandantisensetranscriptomeofmaizelines
AT morrowdarrenj comparativeprofilingofthesenseandantisensetranscriptomeofmaizelines
AT fernandesjohn comparativeprofilingofthesenseandantisensetranscriptomeofmaizelines
AT walbotvirginia comparativeprofilingofthesenseandantisensetranscriptomeofmaizelines