Cargando…

Flock-level risk factors for scrapie in Great Britain: analysis of a 2002 anonymous postal survey

BACKGROUND: In November 2002, an anonymous postal survey of sheep farmers in Great Britain (GB) was conducted to identify factors associated with the flock-level occurrence of scrapie. This survey was undertaken to update an earlier postal survey in 1998, and was the first occasion in which a large-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McIntyre, K Marie, Gubbins, Simon, Sivam, S Kumar, Baylis, Matthew
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1557843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16887027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-2-25
_version_ 1782129420113281024
author McIntyre, K Marie
Gubbins, Simon
Sivam, S Kumar
Baylis, Matthew
author_facet McIntyre, K Marie
Gubbins, Simon
Sivam, S Kumar
Baylis, Matthew
author_sort McIntyre, K Marie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In November 2002, an anonymous postal survey of sheep farmers in Great Britain (GB) was conducted to identify factors associated with the flock-level occurrence of scrapie. This survey was undertaken to update an earlier postal survey in 1998, and was the first occasion in which a large-scale postal survey had been repeated. RESULTS: The results of the 2002 survey indicated that scrapie was more likely to occur in certain geographic regions; in purebred compared to commercial flocks; in larger flocks; in flocks which lambed in group pens compared to those which lambed in individual pens; in flocks which always lambed in the same location compared to those which did not; and in farms which kept certain breeds of sheep. In addition to these factors, the likelihood of the disease occurring in homebred animals was higher in flocks which bred a greater proportion of replacement animals or which bought-in lambs. Finally, within-flock transmission following exposure was more likely to occur in hill flocks compared to other farm types; in flocks which bred a greater proportion of replacement animals; and in farms which kept a certain crossbreed of ewe. CONCLUSION: The risk factors identified from the 1998 and 2002 anonymous postal surveys in Great Britain were similar. However, differences between the surveys were identified in the influence of region and of purchasing behaviour on the risk of scrapie. These differences are most likely a consequence of changes in farmer awareness and the impact of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic, respectively.
format Text
id pubmed-1557843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15578432006-09-01 Flock-level risk factors for scrapie in Great Britain: analysis of a 2002 anonymous postal survey McIntyre, K Marie Gubbins, Simon Sivam, S Kumar Baylis, Matthew BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In November 2002, an anonymous postal survey of sheep farmers in Great Britain (GB) was conducted to identify factors associated with the flock-level occurrence of scrapie. This survey was undertaken to update an earlier postal survey in 1998, and was the first occasion in which a large-scale postal survey had been repeated. RESULTS: The results of the 2002 survey indicated that scrapie was more likely to occur in certain geographic regions; in purebred compared to commercial flocks; in larger flocks; in flocks which lambed in group pens compared to those which lambed in individual pens; in flocks which always lambed in the same location compared to those which did not; and in farms which kept certain breeds of sheep. In addition to these factors, the likelihood of the disease occurring in homebred animals was higher in flocks which bred a greater proportion of replacement animals or which bought-in lambs. Finally, within-flock transmission following exposure was more likely to occur in hill flocks compared to other farm types; in flocks which bred a greater proportion of replacement animals; and in farms which kept a certain crossbreed of ewe. CONCLUSION: The risk factors identified from the 1998 and 2002 anonymous postal surveys in Great Britain were similar. However, differences between the surveys were identified in the influence of region and of purchasing behaviour on the risk of scrapie. These differences are most likely a consequence of changes in farmer awareness and the impact of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic, respectively. BioMed Central 2006-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC1557843/ /pubmed/16887027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-2-25 Text en Copyright © 2006 McIntyre et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McIntyre, K Marie
Gubbins, Simon
Sivam, S Kumar
Baylis, Matthew
Flock-level risk factors for scrapie in Great Britain: analysis of a 2002 anonymous postal survey
title Flock-level risk factors for scrapie in Great Britain: analysis of a 2002 anonymous postal survey
title_full Flock-level risk factors for scrapie in Great Britain: analysis of a 2002 anonymous postal survey
title_fullStr Flock-level risk factors for scrapie in Great Britain: analysis of a 2002 anonymous postal survey
title_full_unstemmed Flock-level risk factors for scrapie in Great Britain: analysis of a 2002 anonymous postal survey
title_short Flock-level risk factors for scrapie in Great Britain: analysis of a 2002 anonymous postal survey
title_sort flock-level risk factors for scrapie in great britain: analysis of a 2002 anonymous postal survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1557843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16887027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-2-25
work_keys_str_mv AT mcintyrekmarie flocklevelriskfactorsforscrapieingreatbritainanalysisofa2002anonymouspostalsurvey
AT gubbinssimon flocklevelriskfactorsforscrapieingreatbritainanalysisofa2002anonymouspostalsurvey
AT sivamskumar flocklevelriskfactorsforscrapieingreatbritainanalysisofa2002anonymouspostalsurvey
AT baylismatthew flocklevelriskfactorsforscrapieingreatbritainanalysisofa2002anonymouspostalsurvey