Cargando…

Chemical resistance of the gram-negative bacteria to different sanitizers in a water purification system

BACKGROUND: Purified water for pharmaceutical purposes must be free of microbial contamination and pyrogens. Even with the additional sanitary and disinfecting treatments applied to the system (sequential operational stages), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas alcaligenes,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazzola, Priscila G, Martins, Alzira MS, Penna, Thereza CV
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1559695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16914053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-131
_version_ 1782129449526886400
author Mazzola, Priscila G
Martins, Alzira MS
Penna, Thereza CV
author_facet Mazzola, Priscila G
Martins, Alzira MS
Penna, Thereza CV
author_sort Mazzola, Priscila G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Purified water for pharmaceutical purposes must be free of microbial contamination and pyrogens. Even with the additional sanitary and disinfecting treatments applied to the system (sequential operational stages), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Pseudomonas picketti, Flavobacterium aureum, Acinetobacter lowffi and Pseudomonas diminuta were isolated and identified from a thirteen-stage purification system. To evaluate the efficacy of the chemical agents used in the disinfecting process along with those used to adjust chemical characteristics of the system, over the identified bacteria, the kinetic parameter of killing time (D-value) necessary to inactivate 90% of the initial bioburden (decimal reduction time) was experimentally determined. METHODS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Pseudomonas picketti, Flavobacterium aureum, Acinetobacter lowffi and Pseudomonas diminuta were called in house (wild) bacteria. Pseudomonas diminuta ATCC 11568, Pseudomonas alcaligenes INCQS , Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442, Pseudomonas fluorescens ATCC 3178, Pseudomonas picketti ATCC 5031, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 937 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 were used as 'standard' bacteria to evaluate resistance at 25°C against either 0.5% citric acid, 0.5% hydrochloric acid, 70% ethanol, 0.5% sodium bisulfite, 0.4% sodium hydroxide, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, or a mixture of 2.2% hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) and 0.45% peracetic acid. RESULTS: The efficacy of the sanitizers varied with concentration and contact time to reduce decimal logarithmic (log(10)) population (n cycles). To kill 90% of the initial population (or one log(10 )cycle), the necessary time (D-value) was for P. aeruginosa into: (i) 0.5% citric acid, D = 3.8 min; (ii) 0.5% hydrochloric acid, D = 6.9 min; (iii) 70% ethanol, D = 9.7 min; (iv) 0.5% sodium bisulfite, D = 5.3 min; (v) 0.4% sodium hydroxide, D = 14.2 min; (vi) 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, D = 7.9 min; (vii) mixture of hydrogen peroxide (2.2%) plus peracetic acid (0.45%), D = 5.5 min. CONCLUSION: The contact time of 180 min of the system with the mixture of H(2)O(2)+ peracetic acid, a total theoretical reduction of 6 log(10 )cycles was attained in the water purified storage tank and distribution loop. The contact time between the water purification system (WPS) and the sanitary agents should be reviewed to reach sufficient bioburden reduction (over 6 log(10)).
format Text
id pubmed-1559695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15596952006-09-05 Chemical resistance of the gram-negative bacteria to different sanitizers in a water purification system Mazzola, Priscila G Martins, Alzira MS Penna, Thereza CV BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Purified water for pharmaceutical purposes must be free of microbial contamination and pyrogens. Even with the additional sanitary and disinfecting treatments applied to the system (sequential operational stages), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Pseudomonas picketti, Flavobacterium aureum, Acinetobacter lowffi and Pseudomonas diminuta were isolated and identified from a thirteen-stage purification system. To evaluate the efficacy of the chemical agents used in the disinfecting process along with those used to adjust chemical characteristics of the system, over the identified bacteria, the kinetic parameter of killing time (D-value) necessary to inactivate 90% of the initial bioburden (decimal reduction time) was experimentally determined. METHODS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Pseudomonas picketti, Flavobacterium aureum, Acinetobacter lowffi and Pseudomonas diminuta were called in house (wild) bacteria. Pseudomonas diminuta ATCC 11568, Pseudomonas alcaligenes INCQS , Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442, Pseudomonas fluorescens ATCC 3178, Pseudomonas picketti ATCC 5031, Bacillus subtilis ATCC 937 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 were used as 'standard' bacteria to evaluate resistance at 25°C against either 0.5% citric acid, 0.5% hydrochloric acid, 70% ethanol, 0.5% sodium bisulfite, 0.4% sodium hydroxide, 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, or a mixture of 2.2% hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) and 0.45% peracetic acid. RESULTS: The efficacy of the sanitizers varied with concentration and contact time to reduce decimal logarithmic (log(10)) population (n cycles). To kill 90% of the initial population (or one log(10 )cycle), the necessary time (D-value) was for P. aeruginosa into: (i) 0.5% citric acid, D = 3.8 min; (ii) 0.5% hydrochloric acid, D = 6.9 min; (iii) 70% ethanol, D = 9.7 min; (iv) 0.5% sodium bisulfite, D = 5.3 min; (v) 0.4% sodium hydroxide, D = 14.2 min; (vi) 0.5% sodium hypochlorite, D = 7.9 min; (vii) mixture of hydrogen peroxide (2.2%) plus peracetic acid (0.45%), D = 5.5 min. CONCLUSION: The contact time of 180 min of the system with the mixture of H(2)O(2)+ peracetic acid, a total theoretical reduction of 6 log(10 )cycles was attained in the water purified storage tank and distribution loop. The contact time between the water purification system (WPS) and the sanitary agents should be reviewed to reach sufficient bioburden reduction (over 6 log(10)). BioMed Central 2006-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC1559695/ /pubmed/16914053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-131 Text en Copyright © 2006 Mazzola et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mazzola, Priscila G
Martins, Alzira MS
Penna, Thereza CV
Chemical resistance of the gram-negative bacteria to different sanitizers in a water purification system
title Chemical resistance of the gram-negative bacteria to different sanitizers in a water purification system
title_full Chemical resistance of the gram-negative bacteria to different sanitizers in a water purification system
title_fullStr Chemical resistance of the gram-negative bacteria to different sanitizers in a water purification system
title_full_unstemmed Chemical resistance of the gram-negative bacteria to different sanitizers in a water purification system
title_short Chemical resistance of the gram-negative bacteria to different sanitizers in a water purification system
title_sort chemical resistance of the gram-negative bacteria to different sanitizers in a water purification system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1559695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16914053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-6-131
work_keys_str_mv AT mazzolapriscilag chemicalresistanceofthegramnegativebacteriatodifferentsanitizersinawaterpurificationsystem
AT martinsalzirams chemicalresistanceofthegramnegativebacteriatodifferentsanitizersinawaterpurificationsystem
AT pennatherezacv chemicalresistanceofthegramnegativebacteriatodifferentsanitizersinawaterpurificationsystem