Cargando…

A public health response to the methamphetamine epidemic: the implementation of contingency management to treat methamphetamine dependence

BACKGROUND: In response to increases in methamphatemine-associated sexually transmitted diseases, the San Francisco Department of Public Health implemented a contingency management (CM) field program called the Positive Reinforcement Opportunity Project (PROP). METHODS: Methamphetamine-using men who...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shoptaw, Steven, Klausner, Jeffrey D, Reback, Cathy J, Tierney, Stephen, Stansell, John, Hare, C Bradley, Gibson, Steven, Siever, Michael, King, William D, Kao, Uyen, Dang, Jeffrey
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1559698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16919170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-214
_version_ 1782129450236772352
author Shoptaw, Steven
Klausner, Jeffrey D
Reback, Cathy J
Tierney, Stephen
Stansell, John
Hare, C Bradley
Gibson, Steven
Siever, Michael
King, William D
Kao, Uyen
Dang, Jeffrey
author_facet Shoptaw, Steven
Klausner, Jeffrey D
Reback, Cathy J
Tierney, Stephen
Stansell, John
Hare, C Bradley
Gibson, Steven
Siever, Michael
King, William D
Kao, Uyen
Dang, Jeffrey
author_sort Shoptaw, Steven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In response to increases in methamphatemine-associated sexually transmitted diseases, the San Francisco Department of Public Health implemented a contingency management (CM) field program called the Positive Reinforcement Opportunity Project (PROP). METHODS: Methamphetamine-using men who have sex with men (MSM) in San Francisco qualified for PROP following expressed interest in the program, provision of an observed urine sample that tested positive for methamphetamine metabolites and self-report of recent methamphetamine use. For 12 weeks, PROP participants provided observed urine samples on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays and received vouchers of increasing value for each consecutive sample that tested negative to metabolites of methamphetamine. Vouchers were exchanged for goods and services that promoted a healthy lifestyle. No cash was provided. Primary outcomes included acceptability (number of enrollments/time), impact (clinical response to treatment and cost-effectiveness as cost per patient treated). RESULTS: Enrollment in PROP was brisk indicating its acceptability. During the first 10 months of operation, 143 men sought treatment and of these 77.6% were HIV-infected. Of those screened, 111 began CM treatment and averaged 15 (42%) methamphetamine-free urine samples out of a possible 36 samples during the 12-week treatment period; 60% completed 4 weeks of treatment; 48% 8 weeks and 30% 12 weeks. Across all participants, an average of $159 (SD = $165) in vouchers or 35.1% of the maximum possible ($453) was provided for these participants. The average cost per participant of the 143 treated was $800. CONCLUSION: Clinical responses to CM in PROP were similar to CM delivered in drug treatment programs, supporting the adaptability and effectiveness of CM to non-traditional drug treatment settings. Costs were reasonable and less than or comparable to other methamphetamine outpatient treatment programs. Further expansion of programs like PROP could address the increasing need for acceptable, feasible and cost-effective methamphetamine treatment in this group with exceptionally high rates of HIV-infection.
format Text
id pubmed-1559698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15596982006-09-05 A public health response to the methamphetamine epidemic: the implementation of contingency management to treat methamphetamine dependence Shoptaw, Steven Klausner, Jeffrey D Reback, Cathy J Tierney, Stephen Stansell, John Hare, C Bradley Gibson, Steven Siever, Michael King, William D Kao, Uyen Dang, Jeffrey BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In response to increases in methamphatemine-associated sexually transmitted diseases, the San Francisco Department of Public Health implemented a contingency management (CM) field program called the Positive Reinforcement Opportunity Project (PROP). METHODS: Methamphetamine-using men who have sex with men (MSM) in San Francisco qualified for PROP following expressed interest in the program, provision of an observed urine sample that tested positive for methamphetamine metabolites and self-report of recent methamphetamine use. For 12 weeks, PROP participants provided observed urine samples on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays and received vouchers of increasing value for each consecutive sample that tested negative to metabolites of methamphetamine. Vouchers were exchanged for goods and services that promoted a healthy lifestyle. No cash was provided. Primary outcomes included acceptability (number of enrollments/time), impact (clinical response to treatment and cost-effectiveness as cost per patient treated). RESULTS: Enrollment in PROP was brisk indicating its acceptability. During the first 10 months of operation, 143 men sought treatment and of these 77.6% were HIV-infected. Of those screened, 111 began CM treatment and averaged 15 (42%) methamphetamine-free urine samples out of a possible 36 samples during the 12-week treatment period; 60% completed 4 weeks of treatment; 48% 8 weeks and 30% 12 weeks. Across all participants, an average of $159 (SD = $165) in vouchers or 35.1% of the maximum possible ($453) was provided for these participants. The average cost per participant of the 143 treated was $800. CONCLUSION: Clinical responses to CM in PROP were similar to CM delivered in drug treatment programs, supporting the adaptability and effectiveness of CM to non-traditional drug treatment settings. Costs were reasonable and less than or comparable to other methamphetamine outpatient treatment programs. Further expansion of programs like PROP could address the increasing need for acceptable, feasible and cost-effective methamphetamine treatment in this group with exceptionally high rates of HIV-infection. BioMed Central 2006-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC1559698/ /pubmed/16919170 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-214 Text en Copyright © 2006 Shoptaw et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shoptaw, Steven
Klausner, Jeffrey D
Reback, Cathy J
Tierney, Stephen
Stansell, John
Hare, C Bradley
Gibson, Steven
Siever, Michael
King, William D
Kao, Uyen
Dang, Jeffrey
A public health response to the methamphetamine epidemic: the implementation of contingency management to treat methamphetamine dependence
title A public health response to the methamphetamine epidemic: the implementation of contingency management to treat methamphetamine dependence
title_full A public health response to the methamphetamine epidemic: the implementation of contingency management to treat methamphetamine dependence
title_fullStr A public health response to the methamphetamine epidemic: the implementation of contingency management to treat methamphetamine dependence
title_full_unstemmed A public health response to the methamphetamine epidemic: the implementation of contingency management to treat methamphetamine dependence
title_short A public health response to the methamphetamine epidemic: the implementation of contingency management to treat methamphetamine dependence
title_sort public health response to the methamphetamine epidemic: the implementation of contingency management to treat methamphetamine dependence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1559698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16919170
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-214
work_keys_str_mv AT shoptawsteven apublichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT klausnerjeffreyd apublichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT rebackcathyj apublichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT tierneystephen apublichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT stanselljohn apublichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT harecbradley apublichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT gibsonsteven apublichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT sievermichael apublichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT kingwilliamd apublichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT kaouyen apublichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT dangjeffrey apublichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT shoptawsteven publichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT klausnerjeffreyd publichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT rebackcathyj publichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT tierneystephen publichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT stanselljohn publichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT harecbradley publichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT gibsonsteven publichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT sievermichael publichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT kingwilliamd publichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT kaouyen publichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence
AT dangjeffrey publichealthresponsetothemethamphetamineepidemictheimplementationofcontingencymanagementtotreatmethamphetaminedependence