Cargando…
Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change
Changes in scores on health status questionnaires are difficult to interpret. Several methods to determine minimally important changes (MICs) have been proposed which can broadly be divided in distribution-based and anchor-based methods. Comparisons of these methods have led to insight into essentia...
Autores principales: | de Vet, Henrica C, Terwee, Caroline B, Ostelo, Raymond W, Beckerman, Heleen, Knol, Dirk L, Bouter, Lex M |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1560110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16925807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-54 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating
an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach
por: de Vet, Henrica C. W., et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
The influence of study population and definition of improvement on the smallest detectable change and the minimal important change of the neck disability index
por: Schuller, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Minimally important change and smallest detectable change of the OSTRC questionnaire in half‐ and full‐marathon runners
por: Franke, Thierry P. C., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist
por: Terwee, Caroline B., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
The NIH Minimal Dataset for Chronic Low Back Pain: Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Change
por: Dutmer, Alisa L., et al.
Publicado: (2019)