Cargando…
Effect of heat and moisture exchanger (HME) positioning on inspiratory gas humidification
BACKGROUND: In mechanically ventilated patients, we investigated how positioning the heat and moisture exchanger (HME) at different places on the ventilator circuit affected inspiratory gas humidification. METHODS: Absolute humidity (AH) and temperature (TEMP) at the proximal end of endotracheal tub...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1562445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16895607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-6-19 |
_version_ | 1782129504494288896 |
---|---|
author | Inui, Daisuke Oto, Jun Nishimura, Masaji |
author_facet | Inui, Daisuke Oto, Jun Nishimura, Masaji |
author_sort | Inui, Daisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In mechanically ventilated patients, we investigated how positioning the heat and moisture exchanger (HME) at different places on the ventilator circuit affected inspiratory gas humidification. METHODS: Absolute humidity (AH) and temperature (TEMP) at the proximal end of endotracheal tube (ETT) were measured in ten mechanically ventilated patients. The HME was connected either directly proximal to the ETT (Site 1) or at before the circuit Y-piece (Site 2: distance from proximal end of ETT and Site 2 was about 19 cm) (Figure. 1). Two devices, Hygrobac S (Mallinckrodt Dar, Mirandola, Italy) and Thermovent HEPA (Smiths Medical International Ltd., Kent, UK) were tested. AH and TEMP were measured with a hygrometer (Moiscope, MERA Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). RESULTS: Hygrobac S provided significantly higher AH and TEMP at both sites than Thermovent HEPA. Both Hygrobac S and with Thermovent HEPA provided significantly higher AH and TEMP when placed proximally to the ETT. CONCLUSION: Although placement proximal to the ETT improved both AH and TEMP in both HMEs tested, one HME performed better in the distal position than the other HME in the proximal position. We conclude the both the type and placement of HME can make a significant difference in maintaining AH and TEMP during adult ventilation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1562445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15624452006-09-08 Effect of heat and moisture exchanger (HME) positioning on inspiratory gas humidification Inui, Daisuke Oto, Jun Nishimura, Masaji BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: In mechanically ventilated patients, we investigated how positioning the heat and moisture exchanger (HME) at different places on the ventilator circuit affected inspiratory gas humidification. METHODS: Absolute humidity (AH) and temperature (TEMP) at the proximal end of endotracheal tube (ETT) were measured in ten mechanically ventilated patients. The HME was connected either directly proximal to the ETT (Site 1) or at before the circuit Y-piece (Site 2: distance from proximal end of ETT and Site 2 was about 19 cm) (Figure. 1). Two devices, Hygrobac S (Mallinckrodt Dar, Mirandola, Italy) and Thermovent HEPA (Smiths Medical International Ltd., Kent, UK) were tested. AH and TEMP were measured with a hygrometer (Moiscope, MERA Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). RESULTS: Hygrobac S provided significantly higher AH and TEMP at both sites than Thermovent HEPA. Both Hygrobac S and with Thermovent HEPA provided significantly higher AH and TEMP when placed proximally to the ETT. CONCLUSION: Although placement proximal to the ETT improved both AH and TEMP in both HMEs tested, one HME performed better in the distal position than the other HME in the proximal position. We conclude the both the type and placement of HME can make a significant difference in maintaining AH and TEMP during adult ventilation. BioMed Central 2006-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC1562445/ /pubmed/16895607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-6-19 Text en Copyright © 2006 Inui et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Inui, Daisuke Oto, Jun Nishimura, Masaji Effect of heat and moisture exchanger (HME) positioning on inspiratory gas humidification |
title | Effect of heat and moisture exchanger (HME) positioning on inspiratory gas humidification |
title_full | Effect of heat and moisture exchanger (HME) positioning on inspiratory gas humidification |
title_fullStr | Effect of heat and moisture exchanger (HME) positioning on inspiratory gas humidification |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of heat and moisture exchanger (HME) positioning on inspiratory gas humidification |
title_short | Effect of heat and moisture exchanger (HME) positioning on inspiratory gas humidification |
title_sort | effect of heat and moisture exchanger (hme) positioning on inspiratory gas humidification |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1562445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16895607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-6-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inuidaisuke effectofheatandmoistureexchangerhmepositioningoninspiratorygashumidification AT otojun effectofheatandmoistureexchangerhmepositioningoninspiratorygashumidification AT nishimuramasaji effectofheatandmoistureexchangerhmepositioningoninspiratorygashumidification |