Cargando…
Review conclusions by Ernst and Canter regarding spinal manipulation refuted
In the April 2006 issue of the Journal of Royal Society of Medicine, Ernst and Canter authored a review of the most recent systematic reviews on the effectiveness of spinal manipulation for any condition. The authors concluded that, except for back pain, spinal manipulation is not an effective inter...
Autores principales: | Bronfort, Gert, Haas, Mitchell, Moher, David, Bouter, Lex, van Tulder, Maurits, Triano, John, Assendelft, Willem JJ, Evans, Roni, Dagenais, Simon, Rosner, Anthony |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1563471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16887028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-14-14 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report
por: Bronfort, Gert, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Spinal manipulation and exercise for low back pain in adolescents: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
por: Schulz, Craig, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Muscle modes of the equestrian rider at walk, rising trot and canter
por: Elmeua González, Marc, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Dose–response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
por: Hanson, Linda, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Max Ernst /
por: Petrová, Eva
Publicado: (1965)