Cargando…

Qualitative Assessment of Local Distribution of Screen for Life Mass Media Materials in Appalachia

INTRODUCTION: Screen for Life: National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign is a multimedia campaign that informs men and women aged 50 and older about the importance of colorectal cancer screening. The Appalachia Cancer Network undertook a qualitative research study to help determine whether Screen f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanderpool, Robin C, Coyne, Cathy A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1563976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16539795
_version_ 1782129526546890752
author Vanderpool, Robin C
Coyne, Cathy A
author_facet Vanderpool, Robin C
Coyne, Cathy A
author_sort Vanderpool, Robin C
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Screen for Life: National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign is a multimedia campaign that informs men and women aged 50 and older about the importance of colorectal cancer screening. The Appalachia Cancer Network undertook a qualitative research study to help determine whether Screen for Life materials are being used and distributed by organizations serving Appalachian residents and to help assess key informants' perceived acceptability of the materials. METHODS: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 13 state and local informants in three Appalachian states to assess the diversity of community organizations that received the materials, the level of material use, and receptivity to Screen for Life. RESULTS: Regional cancer control programs were more active in promoting Screen for Life at local levels than state health departments. Although state health departments are the primary route for distributing Screen for Life materials, they did not report the breadth of activities noted by regional cancer control programs. Several local interview respondents were unfamiliar with Screen for Life, and respondents who were familiar with Screen for Life used the materials in a general, unplanned way. Although some respondents were unfamiliar with the campaign materials, they were interested in Screen for Life. No formal evaluations on the effectiveness of the materials were reported. CONCLUSION: More guidance on how to implement the Screen for Life campaign as a targeted health communication media campaign would be helpful.
format Text
id pubmed-1563976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15639762006-10-17 Qualitative Assessment of Local Distribution of Screen for Life Mass Media Materials in Appalachia Vanderpool, Robin C Coyne, Cathy A Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Screen for Life: National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign is a multimedia campaign that informs men and women aged 50 and older about the importance of colorectal cancer screening. The Appalachia Cancer Network undertook a qualitative research study to help determine whether Screen for Life materials are being used and distributed by organizations serving Appalachian residents and to help assess key informants' perceived acceptability of the materials. METHODS: Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 13 state and local informants in three Appalachian states to assess the diversity of community organizations that received the materials, the level of material use, and receptivity to Screen for Life. RESULTS: Regional cancer control programs were more active in promoting Screen for Life at local levels than state health departments. Although state health departments are the primary route for distributing Screen for Life materials, they did not report the breadth of activities noted by regional cancer control programs. Several local interview respondents were unfamiliar with Screen for Life, and respondents who were familiar with Screen for Life used the materials in a general, unplanned way. Although some respondents were unfamiliar with the campaign materials, they were interested in Screen for Life. No formal evaluations on the effectiveness of the materials were reported. CONCLUSION: More guidance on how to implement the Screen for Life campaign as a targeted health communication media campaign would be helpful. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1563976/ /pubmed/16539795 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Vanderpool, Robin C
Coyne, Cathy A
Qualitative Assessment of Local Distribution of Screen for Life Mass Media Materials in Appalachia
title Qualitative Assessment of Local Distribution of Screen for Life Mass Media Materials in Appalachia
title_full Qualitative Assessment of Local Distribution of Screen for Life Mass Media Materials in Appalachia
title_fullStr Qualitative Assessment of Local Distribution of Screen for Life Mass Media Materials in Appalachia
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Assessment of Local Distribution of Screen for Life Mass Media Materials in Appalachia
title_short Qualitative Assessment of Local Distribution of Screen for Life Mass Media Materials in Appalachia
title_sort qualitative assessment of local distribution of screen for life mass media materials in appalachia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1563976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16539795
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderpoolrobinc qualitativeassessmentoflocaldistributionofscreenforlifemassmediamaterialsinappalachia
AT coynecathya qualitativeassessmentoflocaldistributionofscreenforlifemassmediamaterialsinappalachia