Cargando…

Screening Rates and Characteristics of Health Plan Members Who Respond to Screening Reminders

INTRODUCTION: Preventive screening is widely recognized as a key component of cost-effective, high-quality health care. Even so, national screening for cancer, diabetes, and cholesterol falls far short of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Although evidence has shown that reminder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Jun, Davis, James, Taira, Deborah A, Yamashita, Marisa
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1563981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16539797
_version_ 1782129527994974208
author Zhu, Jun
Davis, James
Taira, Deborah A
Yamashita, Marisa
author_facet Zhu, Jun
Davis, James
Taira, Deborah A
Yamashita, Marisa
author_sort Zhu, Jun
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Preventive screening is widely recognized as a key component of cost-effective, high-quality health care. Even so, national screening for cancer, diabetes, and cholesterol falls far short of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Although evidence has shown that reminder programs improve preventive screening rates, this study is one of the first to examine the characteristics of health plan members who respond to screening reminders. METHODS: The study sample included active members of a large health plan in Hawaii who were identified by an algorithm as not having received one or more recommended screenings based on age and sex criteria (2000–2003) for breast cancer (n = 44,331), cervical cancer (n = 73,875), colon cancer (n = 131,860), diabetes (n = 86,216), and cholesterol (n = 54,843). Statistical analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models. In the proportional hazard models, reminder letters were treated as time-varying exposures. Hazard ratios, or rate ratios, were used to examine the relationship between health plan member and physician characteristics and the likelihood of responding to the reminders. The effects of additional or multiple reminders among health plan members receiving more than one reminder were examined in multivariable regression models. RESULTS: The impact of health plan member characteristics and number of office visits on the response to reminders varied among the five health-screening types. Health plan members responded better to reminders for diabetes screening than for colon cancer screening. Members sent their second annual reminders were less likely to obtain screening than members sent their first reminder. Members receiving their third (or more) annual reminder were especially recalcitrant. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the response to reminders differs according to patient characteristics. In particular, targeted interventions may be needed to encourage screening for younger and healthier members whose response rate to reminders was low. Further research is needed to determine how health plans can best reach members who do not respond to patient reminders.
format Text
id pubmed-1563981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15639812006-10-17 Screening Rates and Characteristics of Health Plan Members Who Respond to Screening Reminders Zhu, Jun Davis, James Taira, Deborah A Yamashita, Marisa Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Preventive screening is widely recognized as a key component of cost-effective, high-quality health care. Even so, national screening for cancer, diabetes, and cholesterol falls far short of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Although evidence has shown that reminder programs improve preventive screening rates, this study is one of the first to examine the characteristics of health plan members who respond to screening reminders. METHODS: The study sample included active members of a large health plan in Hawaii who were identified by an algorithm as not having received one or more recommended screenings based on age and sex criteria (2000–2003) for breast cancer (n = 44,331), cervical cancer (n = 73,875), colon cancer (n = 131,860), diabetes (n = 86,216), and cholesterol (n = 54,843). Statistical analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models. In the proportional hazard models, reminder letters were treated as time-varying exposures. Hazard ratios, or rate ratios, were used to examine the relationship between health plan member and physician characteristics and the likelihood of responding to the reminders. The effects of additional or multiple reminders among health plan members receiving more than one reminder were examined in multivariable regression models. RESULTS: The impact of health plan member characteristics and number of office visits on the response to reminders varied among the five health-screening types. Health plan members responded better to reminders for diabetes screening than for colon cancer screening. Members sent their second annual reminders were less likely to obtain screening than members sent their first reminder. Members receiving their third (or more) annual reminder were especially recalcitrant. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the response to reminders differs according to patient characteristics. In particular, targeted interventions may be needed to encourage screening for younger and healthier members whose response rate to reminders was low. Further research is needed to determine how health plans can best reach members who do not respond to patient reminders. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2006-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC1563981/ /pubmed/16539797 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhu, Jun
Davis, James
Taira, Deborah A
Yamashita, Marisa
Screening Rates and Characteristics of Health Plan Members Who Respond to Screening Reminders
title Screening Rates and Characteristics of Health Plan Members Who Respond to Screening Reminders
title_full Screening Rates and Characteristics of Health Plan Members Who Respond to Screening Reminders
title_fullStr Screening Rates and Characteristics of Health Plan Members Who Respond to Screening Reminders
title_full_unstemmed Screening Rates and Characteristics of Health Plan Members Who Respond to Screening Reminders
title_short Screening Rates and Characteristics of Health Plan Members Who Respond to Screening Reminders
title_sort screening rates and characteristics of health plan members who respond to screening reminders
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1563981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16539797
work_keys_str_mv AT zhujun screeningratesandcharacteristicsofhealthplanmemberswhorespondtoscreeningreminders
AT davisjames screeningratesandcharacteristicsofhealthplanmemberswhorespondtoscreeningreminders
AT tairadeboraha screeningratesandcharacteristicsofhealthplanmemberswhorespondtoscreeningreminders
AT yamashitamarisa screeningratesandcharacteristicsofhealthplanmemberswhorespondtoscreeningreminders