Cargando…

Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data

BACKGROUND: Assessment of array quality is an essential step in the analysis of data from microarray experiments. Once detected, less reliable arrays are typically excluded or "filtered" from further analysis to avoid misleading results. RESULTS: In this article, a graduated approach to ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ritchie, Matthew E, Diyagama, Dileepa, Neilson, Jody, van Laar, Ryan, Dobrovic, Alexander, Holloway, Andrew, Smyth, Gordon K
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1564422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16712727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-261
_version_ 1782129569413726208
author Ritchie, Matthew E
Diyagama, Dileepa
Neilson, Jody
van Laar, Ryan
Dobrovic, Alexander
Holloway, Andrew
Smyth, Gordon K
author_facet Ritchie, Matthew E
Diyagama, Dileepa
Neilson, Jody
van Laar, Ryan
Dobrovic, Alexander
Holloway, Andrew
Smyth, Gordon K
author_sort Ritchie, Matthew E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of array quality is an essential step in the analysis of data from microarray experiments. Once detected, less reliable arrays are typically excluded or "filtered" from further analysis to avoid misleading results. RESULTS: In this article, a graduated approach to array quality is considered based on empirical reproducibility of the gene expression measures from replicate arrays. Weights are assigned to each microarray by fitting a heteroscedastic linear model with shared array variance terms. A novel gene-by-gene update algorithm is used to efficiently estimate the array variances. The inverse variances are used as weights in the linear model analysis to identify differentially expressed genes. The method successfully assigns lower weights to less reproducible arrays from different experiments. Down-weighting the observations from suspect arrays increases the power to detect differential expression. In smaller experiments, this approach outperforms the usual method of filtering the data. The method is available in the limma software package which is implemented in the R software environment. CONCLUSION: This method complements existing normalisation and spot quality procedures, and allows poorer quality arrays, which would otherwise be discarded, to be included in an analysis. It is applicable to microarray data from experiments with some level of replication.
format Text
id pubmed-1564422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15644222006-09-14 Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data Ritchie, Matthew E Diyagama, Dileepa Neilson, Jody van Laar, Ryan Dobrovic, Alexander Holloway, Andrew Smyth, Gordon K BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Assessment of array quality is an essential step in the analysis of data from microarray experiments. Once detected, less reliable arrays are typically excluded or "filtered" from further analysis to avoid misleading results. RESULTS: In this article, a graduated approach to array quality is considered based on empirical reproducibility of the gene expression measures from replicate arrays. Weights are assigned to each microarray by fitting a heteroscedastic linear model with shared array variance terms. A novel gene-by-gene update algorithm is used to efficiently estimate the array variances. The inverse variances are used as weights in the linear model analysis to identify differentially expressed genes. The method successfully assigns lower weights to less reproducible arrays from different experiments. Down-weighting the observations from suspect arrays increases the power to detect differential expression. In smaller experiments, this approach outperforms the usual method of filtering the data. The method is available in the limma software package which is implemented in the R software environment. CONCLUSION: This method complements existing normalisation and spot quality procedures, and allows poorer quality arrays, which would otherwise be discarded, to be included in an analysis. It is applicable to microarray data from experiments with some level of replication. BioMed Central 2006-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1564422/ /pubmed/16712727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-261 Text en Copyright © 2006 Ritchie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Ritchie, Matthew E
Diyagama, Dileepa
Neilson, Jody
van Laar, Ryan
Dobrovic, Alexander
Holloway, Andrew
Smyth, Gordon K
Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data
title Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data
title_full Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data
title_fullStr Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data
title_full_unstemmed Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data
title_short Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data
title_sort empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1564422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16712727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-261
work_keys_str_mv AT ritchiematthewe empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata
AT diyagamadileepa empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata
AT neilsonjody empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata
AT vanlaarryan empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata
AT dobrovicalexander empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata
AT hollowayandrew empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata
AT smythgordonk empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata