Cargando…
Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data
BACKGROUND: Assessment of array quality is an essential step in the analysis of data from microarray experiments. Once detected, less reliable arrays are typically excluded or "filtered" from further analysis to avoid misleading results. RESULTS: In this article, a graduated approach to ar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2006
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1564422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16712727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-261 |
_version_ | 1782129569413726208 |
---|---|
author | Ritchie, Matthew E Diyagama, Dileepa Neilson, Jody van Laar, Ryan Dobrovic, Alexander Holloway, Andrew Smyth, Gordon K |
author_facet | Ritchie, Matthew E Diyagama, Dileepa Neilson, Jody van Laar, Ryan Dobrovic, Alexander Holloway, Andrew Smyth, Gordon K |
author_sort | Ritchie, Matthew E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Assessment of array quality is an essential step in the analysis of data from microarray experiments. Once detected, less reliable arrays are typically excluded or "filtered" from further analysis to avoid misleading results. RESULTS: In this article, a graduated approach to array quality is considered based on empirical reproducibility of the gene expression measures from replicate arrays. Weights are assigned to each microarray by fitting a heteroscedastic linear model with shared array variance terms. A novel gene-by-gene update algorithm is used to efficiently estimate the array variances. The inverse variances are used as weights in the linear model analysis to identify differentially expressed genes. The method successfully assigns lower weights to less reproducible arrays from different experiments. Down-weighting the observations from suspect arrays increases the power to detect differential expression. In smaller experiments, this approach outperforms the usual method of filtering the data. The method is available in the limma software package which is implemented in the R software environment. CONCLUSION: This method complements existing normalisation and spot quality procedures, and allows poorer quality arrays, which would otherwise be discarded, to be included in an analysis. It is applicable to microarray data from experiments with some level of replication. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-1564422 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-15644222006-09-14 Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data Ritchie, Matthew E Diyagama, Dileepa Neilson, Jody van Laar, Ryan Dobrovic, Alexander Holloway, Andrew Smyth, Gordon K BMC Bioinformatics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Assessment of array quality is an essential step in the analysis of data from microarray experiments. Once detected, less reliable arrays are typically excluded or "filtered" from further analysis to avoid misleading results. RESULTS: In this article, a graduated approach to array quality is considered based on empirical reproducibility of the gene expression measures from replicate arrays. Weights are assigned to each microarray by fitting a heteroscedastic linear model with shared array variance terms. A novel gene-by-gene update algorithm is used to efficiently estimate the array variances. The inverse variances are used as weights in the linear model analysis to identify differentially expressed genes. The method successfully assigns lower weights to less reproducible arrays from different experiments. Down-weighting the observations from suspect arrays increases the power to detect differential expression. In smaller experiments, this approach outperforms the usual method of filtering the data. The method is available in the limma software package which is implemented in the R software environment. CONCLUSION: This method complements existing normalisation and spot quality procedures, and allows poorer quality arrays, which would otherwise be discarded, to be included in an analysis. It is applicable to microarray data from experiments with some level of replication. BioMed Central 2006-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC1564422/ /pubmed/16712727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-261 Text en Copyright © 2006 Ritchie et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Ritchie, Matthew E Diyagama, Dileepa Neilson, Jody van Laar, Ryan Dobrovic, Alexander Holloway, Andrew Smyth, Gordon K Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data |
title | Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data |
title_full | Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data |
title_fullStr | Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data |
title_full_unstemmed | Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data |
title_short | Empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data |
title_sort | empirical array quality weights in the analysis of microarray data |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1564422/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16712727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-261 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ritchiematthewe empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata AT diyagamadileepa empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata AT neilsonjody empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata AT vanlaarryan empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata AT dobrovicalexander empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata AT hollowayandrew empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata AT smythgordonk empiricalarrayqualityweightsintheanalysisofmicroarraydata |