Cargando…

A comparison of Pfam and MEROPS: Two databases, one comprehensive, and one specialised.

BACKGROUND: We wished to compare two databases based on sequence similarity: one that aims to be comprehensive in its coverage of known sequences, and one that specialises in a relatively small subset of known sequences. One of the motivations behind this study was quality control. Pfam is a compreh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Studholme, David J, Rawlings, Neil D, Barrett, Alan J, Bateman, Alex
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC156619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12740029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-17
_version_ 1782120786182537216
author Studholme, David J
Rawlings, Neil D
Barrett, Alan J
Bateman, Alex
author_facet Studholme, David J
Rawlings, Neil D
Barrett, Alan J
Bateman, Alex
author_sort Studholme, David J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We wished to compare two databases based on sequence similarity: one that aims to be comprehensive in its coverage of known sequences, and one that specialises in a relatively small subset of known sequences. One of the motivations behind this study was quality control. Pfam is a comprehensive collection of alignments and hidden Markov models representing families of proteins and domains. MEROPS is a catalogue and classification of enzymes with proteolytic activity (peptidases or proteases). These secondary databases are used by researchers worldwide, yet their contents are not peer reviewed. Therefore, we hoped that a systematic comparison of the contents of Pfam and MEROPS would highlight missing members and false-positives leading to improvements in quality of both databases. An additional reason for carrying out this study was to explore the extent of consensus in the definition of a protein family. RESULTS: About half (89 out of 174) of the peptidase families in MEROPS overlapped single Pfam families. A further 32 MEROPS families overlapped multiple Pfam families. Where possible, new Pfam families were built to represent most of the MEROPS families that did not overlap Pfam. When comparing the numbers of sequences found in the overlap between a MEROPS family and its corresponding Pfam family, in most cases the overlap was substantial (52 pairs of MEROPS and Pfam families had an intersection size of greater than 75% of the union) but there were some differences in the sets of sequences included in the MEROPS families versus the overlapping Pfam families. CONCLUSIONS: A number of the discrepancies between MEROPS families and their corresponding Pfam families arose from differences in the aims and philosophies of the two databases. Examination of some of the discrepancies highlighted additional members of families, which have subsequently been added in both Pfam and MEROPS. This has led to improvements in the quality of both databases. Overall there was a great deal of consensus between the databases in definitions of a protein family.
format Text
id pubmed-156619
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1566192003-06-05 A comparison of Pfam and MEROPS: Two databases, one comprehensive, and one specialised. Studholme, David J Rawlings, Neil D Barrett, Alan J Bateman, Alex BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: We wished to compare two databases based on sequence similarity: one that aims to be comprehensive in its coverage of known sequences, and one that specialises in a relatively small subset of known sequences. One of the motivations behind this study was quality control. Pfam is a comprehensive collection of alignments and hidden Markov models representing families of proteins and domains. MEROPS is a catalogue and classification of enzymes with proteolytic activity (peptidases or proteases). These secondary databases are used by researchers worldwide, yet their contents are not peer reviewed. Therefore, we hoped that a systematic comparison of the contents of Pfam and MEROPS would highlight missing members and false-positives leading to improvements in quality of both databases. An additional reason for carrying out this study was to explore the extent of consensus in the definition of a protein family. RESULTS: About half (89 out of 174) of the peptidase families in MEROPS overlapped single Pfam families. A further 32 MEROPS families overlapped multiple Pfam families. Where possible, new Pfam families were built to represent most of the MEROPS families that did not overlap Pfam. When comparing the numbers of sequences found in the overlap between a MEROPS family and its corresponding Pfam family, in most cases the overlap was substantial (52 pairs of MEROPS and Pfam families had an intersection size of greater than 75% of the union) but there were some differences in the sets of sequences included in the MEROPS families versus the overlapping Pfam families. CONCLUSIONS: A number of the discrepancies between MEROPS families and their corresponding Pfam families arose from differences in the aims and philosophies of the two databases. Examination of some of the discrepancies highlighted additional members of families, which have subsequently been added in both Pfam and MEROPS. This has led to improvements in the quality of both databases. Overall there was a great deal of consensus between the databases in definitions of a protein family. BioMed Central 2003-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC156619/ /pubmed/12740029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-17 Text en Copyright © 2003 Studholme et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Studholme, David J
Rawlings, Neil D
Barrett, Alan J
Bateman, Alex
A comparison of Pfam and MEROPS: Two databases, one comprehensive, and one specialised.
title A comparison of Pfam and MEROPS: Two databases, one comprehensive, and one specialised.
title_full A comparison of Pfam and MEROPS: Two databases, one comprehensive, and one specialised.
title_fullStr A comparison of Pfam and MEROPS: Two databases, one comprehensive, and one specialised.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of Pfam and MEROPS: Two databases, one comprehensive, and one specialised.
title_short A comparison of Pfam and MEROPS: Two databases, one comprehensive, and one specialised.
title_sort comparison of pfam and merops: two databases, one comprehensive, and one specialised.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC156619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12740029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-17
work_keys_str_mv AT studholmedavidj acomparisonofpfamandmeropstwodatabasesonecomprehensiveandonespecialised
AT rawlingsneild acomparisonofpfamandmeropstwodatabasesonecomprehensiveandonespecialised
AT barrettalanj acomparisonofpfamandmeropstwodatabasesonecomprehensiveandonespecialised
AT batemanalex acomparisonofpfamandmeropstwodatabasesonecomprehensiveandonespecialised
AT studholmedavidj comparisonofpfamandmeropstwodatabasesonecomprehensiveandonespecialised
AT rawlingsneild comparisonofpfamandmeropstwodatabasesonecomprehensiveandonespecialised
AT barrettalanj comparisonofpfamandmeropstwodatabasesonecomprehensiveandonespecialised
AT batemanalex comparisonofpfamandmeropstwodatabasesonecomprehensiveandonespecialised