Cargando…

Screening tests for autoimmune-related immunotoxicity.

A large number of chemicals induce or exacerbate autoimmune-like diseases in man. Because of the complexity of processes involved, these adverse effects are often if not always missed in standard toxicity testing. To date no validated and generally applicable predictive animal model exists and only...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pieters, R, Albers, R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1566255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10502529
_version_ 1782129583007465472
author Pieters, R
Albers, R
author_facet Pieters, R
Albers, R
author_sort Pieters, R
collection PubMed
description A large number of chemicals induce or exacerbate autoimmune-like diseases in man. Because of the complexity of processes involved, these adverse effects are often if not always missed in standard toxicity testing. To date no validated and generally applicable predictive animal model exists and only a few chemicals have actually been shown to induce adverse autoimmune effects in certain animals. The popliteal lymph node assay (PLNA) is a very promising animal test to (pre)screen for systemic immunosensitizing, including autoimmunogenic potential. This review describes the essentials of the various PLNAs against the background of current understanding of chemically induced systemic immunostimulation. The most simple primary PLNA measures enlargement of the popliteal lymph node 6-8 days after subcutaneous injection of a chemical into the footpad. The primary PLNA can distinguish between immunostimulating (both sensitizers and irritants) and innocent chemicals but does not assess the involvement of T cells or immunosensitization. For this, but also for elucidation of relevant mechanisms, detection of anamnestic responses in secondary PLNAs or responses to reporter antigens in the modified PLNA are suitable. To date over 100 compounds (drugs and environmental pollutants) have been tested, and results show a good correlation with reported immunostimulating (both autoimmunogenic and allergic) potential. Importantly, no false-negative chemicals were detected if metabolism was considered. The various types of the PLNA, but in particular the secondary and modified PLNAs, await extensive validation before they can be recommended as a standard test for autoimmunogenic potential.
format Text
id pubmed-1566255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15662552006-09-19 Screening tests for autoimmune-related immunotoxicity. Pieters, R Albers, R Environ Health Perspect Research Article A large number of chemicals induce or exacerbate autoimmune-like diseases in man. Because of the complexity of processes involved, these adverse effects are often if not always missed in standard toxicity testing. To date no validated and generally applicable predictive animal model exists and only a few chemicals have actually been shown to induce adverse autoimmune effects in certain animals. The popliteal lymph node assay (PLNA) is a very promising animal test to (pre)screen for systemic immunosensitizing, including autoimmunogenic potential. This review describes the essentials of the various PLNAs against the background of current understanding of chemically induced systemic immunostimulation. The most simple primary PLNA measures enlargement of the popliteal lymph node 6-8 days after subcutaneous injection of a chemical into the footpad. The primary PLNA can distinguish between immunostimulating (both sensitizers and irritants) and innocent chemicals but does not assess the involvement of T cells or immunosensitization. For this, but also for elucidation of relevant mechanisms, detection of anamnestic responses in secondary PLNAs or responses to reporter antigens in the modified PLNA are suitable. To date over 100 compounds (drugs and environmental pollutants) have been tested, and results show a good correlation with reported immunostimulating (both autoimmunogenic and allergic) potential. Importantly, no false-negative chemicals were detected if metabolism was considered. The various types of the PLNA, but in particular the secondary and modified PLNAs, await extensive validation before they can be recommended as a standard test for autoimmunogenic potential. 1999-10 /pmc/articles/PMC1566255/ /pubmed/10502529 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Pieters, R
Albers, R
Screening tests for autoimmune-related immunotoxicity.
title Screening tests for autoimmune-related immunotoxicity.
title_full Screening tests for autoimmune-related immunotoxicity.
title_fullStr Screening tests for autoimmune-related immunotoxicity.
title_full_unstemmed Screening tests for autoimmune-related immunotoxicity.
title_short Screening tests for autoimmune-related immunotoxicity.
title_sort screening tests for autoimmune-related immunotoxicity.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1566255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10502529
work_keys_str_mv AT pietersr screeningtestsforautoimmunerelatedimmunotoxicity
AT albersr screeningtestsforautoimmunerelatedimmunotoxicity