Cargando…

A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity.

A two-stage procedure for estimating sensitivity and specificity is described. The procedure is developed in the context of a validation study for self-reported atypical nevi, a potentially useful measure in the study of risk factors for malignant melanoma. The first stage consists of a sample of N...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tosteson, T D, Titus-Ernstoff, L, Baron, J A, Karagas, M R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1566548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7851324
_version_ 1782129643102404608
author Tosteson, T D
Titus-Ernstoff, L
Baron, J A
Karagas, M R
author_facet Tosteson, T D
Titus-Ernstoff, L
Baron, J A
Karagas, M R
author_sort Tosteson, T D
collection PubMed
description A two-stage procedure for estimating sensitivity and specificity is described. The procedure is developed in the context of a validation study for self-reported atypical nevi, a potentially useful measure in the study of risk factors for malignant melanoma. The first stage consists of a sample of N individuals classified only by the test measure. The second stage is a subsample of size m, stratified according the information collected in the first stage, in which the presence of atypical nevi is determined by clinical examination. Using missing data methods for contingency tables, maximum likelihood estimators for the joint distribution of the test measure and the "gold standard" clinical evaluation are presented, along with efficient estimators for the sensitivity and specificity. Asymptotic coefficients of variation are computed to compare alternative sampling strategies for the second stage.
format Text
id pubmed-1566548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1994
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15665482006-09-19 A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity. Tosteson, T D Titus-Ernstoff, L Baron, J A Karagas, M R Environ Health Perspect Research Article A two-stage procedure for estimating sensitivity and specificity is described. The procedure is developed in the context of a validation study for self-reported atypical nevi, a potentially useful measure in the study of risk factors for malignant melanoma. The first stage consists of a sample of N individuals classified only by the test measure. The second stage is a subsample of size m, stratified according the information collected in the first stage, in which the presence of atypical nevi is determined by clinical examination. Using missing data methods for contingency tables, maximum likelihood estimators for the joint distribution of the test measure and the "gold standard" clinical evaluation are presented, along with efficient estimators for the sensitivity and specificity. Asymptotic coefficients of variation are computed to compare alternative sampling strategies for the second stage. 1994-11 /pmc/articles/PMC1566548/ /pubmed/7851324 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Tosteson, T D
Titus-Ernstoff, L
Baron, J A
Karagas, M R
A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity.
title A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity.
title_full A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity.
title_fullStr A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity.
title_full_unstemmed A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity.
title_short A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity.
title_sort two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1566548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7851324
work_keys_str_mv AT tostesontd atwostagevalidationstudyfordeterminingsensitivityandspecificity
AT titusernstoffl atwostagevalidationstudyfordeterminingsensitivityandspecificity
AT baronja atwostagevalidationstudyfordeterminingsensitivityandspecificity
AT karagasmr atwostagevalidationstudyfordeterminingsensitivityandspecificity
AT tostesontd twostagevalidationstudyfordeterminingsensitivityandspecificity
AT titusernstoffl twostagevalidationstudyfordeterminingsensitivityandspecificity
AT baronja twostagevalidationstudyfordeterminingsensitivityandspecificity
AT karagasmr twostagevalidationstudyfordeterminingsensitivityandspecificity