Cargando…
Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women
BACKGROUND: Low levels of light exposure at critical times are thought to cause seasonal affective disorder. Investigators, in studies demonstrating the usefulness of bright light therapy, also have implicated light's role in non-seasonal depression. The precise cause of postpartum depression h...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC156656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12744724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-3-5 |
_version_ | 1782120794204143616 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Emily J Kripke, Daniel F Stein, Martin T Parry, Barbara L |
author_facet | Wang, Emily J Kripke, Daniel F Stein, Martin T Parry, Barbara L |
author_sort | Wang, Emily J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Low levels of light exposure at critical times are thought to cause seasonal affective disorder. Investigators, in studies demonstrating the usefulness of bright light therapy, also have implicated light's role in non-seasonal depression. The precise cause of postpartum depression has not been delineated, but it seemed possible that new mothers would spend reduced time in daylight. The goal of this study was to examine the levels of illumination experienced by postpartum mothers and to discover any relationship between light exposure and mood levels experienced during the postpartum period. METHODS: Fifteen postpartum women, who did not have any baseline indication of depression, wore a wrist device (Actillume) for 72 hours to measure their exposure to light. At the end of the recording period, they completed a self-reported measure of mood. The mean light exposure of these postpartum women (expressed as the 24-hour average logarithm of illumination in lux) was compared with that of a representative sample of women of comparable age, residence, and seasonal months of recording. Mood levels were then rank-ordered and tested for correlation with light exposure levels. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the amount of light [log(10)lux] experienced by postpartum (1.01 SD 0.236) and control women (1.06 SD 0.285). Mood was not correlated with illumination in the postpartum sample. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum women in San Diego did not receive reduced light, nor was low mood related to low illumination. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-156656 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-1566562003-06-05 Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women Wang, Emily J Kripke, Daniel F Stein, Martin T Parry, Barbara L BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Low levels of light exposure at critical times are thought to cause seasonal affective disorder. Investigators, in studies demonstrating the usefulness of bright light therapy, also have implicated light's role in non-seasonal depression. The precise cause of postpartum depression has not been delineated, but it seemed possible that new mothers would spend reduced time in daylight. The goal of this study was to examine the levels of illumination experienced by postpartum mothers and to discover any relationship between light exposure and mood levels experienced during the postpartum period. METHODS: Fifteen postpartum women, who did not have any baseline indication of depression, wore a wrist device (Actillume) for 72 hours to measure their exposure to light. At the end of the recording period, they completed a self-reported measure of mood. The mean light exposure of these postpartum women (expressed as the 24-hour average logarithm of illumination in lux) was compared with that of a representative sample of women of comparable age, residence, and seasonal months of recording. Mood levels were then rank-ordered and tested for correlation with light exposure levels. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the amount of light [log(10)lux] experienced by postpartum (1.01 SD 0.236) and control women (1.06 SD 0.285). Mood was not correlated with illumination in the postpartum sample. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum women in San Diego did not receive reduced light, nor was low mood related to low illumination. BioMed Central 2003-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC156656/ /pubmed/12744724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-3-5 Text en Copyright © 2003 Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Emily J Kripke, Daniel F Stein, Martin T Parry, Barbara L Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women |
title | Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women |
title_full | Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women |
title_fullStr | Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women |
title_full_unstemmed | Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women |
title_short | Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women |
title_sort | measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC156656/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12744724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-3-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangemilyj measurementofilluminationexposureinpostpartumwomen AT kripkedanielf measurementofilluminationexposureinpostpartumwomen AT steinmartint measurementofilluminationexposureinpostpartumwomen AT parrybarbaral measurementofilluminationexposureinpostpartumwomen |