Cargando…

Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women

BACKGROUND: Low levels of light exposure at critical times are thought to cause seasonal affective disorder. Investigators, in studies demonstrating the usefulness of bright light therapy, also have implicated light's role in non-seasonal depression. The precise cause of postpartum depression h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Emily J, Kripke, Daniel F, Stein, Martin T, Parry, Barbara L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC156656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12744724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-3-5
_version_ 1782120794204143616
author Wang, Emily J
Kripke, Daniel F
Stein, Martin T
Parry, Barbara L
author_facet Wang, Emily J
Kripke, Daniel F
Stein, Martin T
Parry, Barbara L
author_sort Wang, Emily J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low levels of light exposure at critical times are thought to cause seasonal affective disorder. Investigators, in studies demonstrating the usefulness of bright light therapy, also have implicated light's role in non-seasonal depression. The precise cause of postpartum depression has not been delineated, but it seemed possible that new mothers would spend reduced time in daylight. The goal of this study was to examine the levels of illumination experienced by postpartum mothers and to discover any relationship between light exposure and mood levels experienced during the postpartum period. METHODS: Fifteen postpartum women, who did not have any baseline indication of depression, wore a wrist device (Actillume) for 72 hours to measure their exposure to light. At the end of the recording period, they completed a self-reported measure of mood. The mean light exposure of these postpartum women (expressed as the 24-hour average logarithm of illumination in lux) was compared with that of a representative sample of women of comparable age, residence, and seasonal months of recording. Mood levels were then rank-ordered and tested for correlation with light exposure levels. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the amount of light [log(10)lux] experienced by postpartum (1.01 SD 0.236) and control women (1.06 SD 0.285). Mood was not correlated with illumination in the postpartum sample. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum women in San Diego did not receive reduced light, nor was low mood related to low illumination.
format Text
id pubmed-156656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-1566562003-06-05 Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women Wang, Emily J Kripke, Daniel F Stein, Martin T Parry, Barbara L BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Low levels of light exposure at critical times are thought to cause seasonal affective disorder. Investigators, in studies demonstrating the usefulness of bright light therapy, also have implicated light's role in non-seasonal depression. The precise cause of postpartum depression has not been delineated, but it seemed possible that new mothers would spend reduced time in daylight. The goal of this study was to examine the levels of illumination experienced by postpartum mothers and to discover any relationship between light exposure and mood levels experienced during the postpartum period. METHODS: Fifteen postpartum women, who did not have any baseline indication of depression, wore a wrist device (Actillume) for 72 hours to measure their exposure to light. At the end of the recording period, they completed a self-reported measure of mood. The mean light exposure of these postpartum women (expressed as the 24-hour average logarithm of illumination in lux) was compared with that of a representative sample of women of comparable age, residence, and seasonal months of recording. Mood levels were then rank-ordered and tested for correlation with light exposure levels. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the amount of light [log(10)lux] experienced by postpartum (1.01 SD 0.236) and control women (1.06 SD 0.285). Mood was not correlated with illumination in the postpartum sample. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum women in San Diego did not receive reduced light, nor was low mood related to low illumination. BioMed Central 2003-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC156656/ /pubmed/12744724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-3-5 Text en Copyright © 2003 Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Emily J
Kripke, Daniel F
Stein, Martin T
Parry, Barbara L
Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women
title Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women
title_full Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women
title_fullStr Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women
title_short Measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women
title_sort measurement of illumination exposure in postpartum women
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC156656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12744724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-3-5
work_keys_str_mv AT wangemilyj measurementofilluminationexposureinpostpartumwomen
AT kripkedanielf measurementofilluminationexposureinpostpartumwomen
AT steinmartint measurementofilluminationexposureinpostpartumwomen
AT parrybarbaral measurementofilluminationexposureinpostpartumwomen