Cargando…

Review of animal/in vitro data on biological effects of man-made fibers.

This paper reviews the investigations with man-made fibers (MMF). Insulation woods: glasswool (GW), rockwool (RW), slagwool (SW), glass microfibers (GMF), glass filaments (GFiI), and refractory ceramic fibers (RCF) have been used in experimental animals and in in vitro cell systems. A large heteroge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellouk, S A, Jaurand, M C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1567084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7925187
_version_ 1782129754955055104
author Ellouk, S A
Jaurand, M C
author_facet Ellouk, S A
Jaurand, M C
author_sort Ellouk, S A
collection PubMed
description This paper reviews the investigations with man-made fibers (MMF). Insulation woods: glasswool (GW), rockwool (RW), slagwool (SW), glass microfibers (GMF), glass filaments (GFiI), and refractory ceramic fibers (RCF) have been used in experimental animals and in in vitro cell systems. A large heterogeneous number of fibers, methods of fiber preparation, size selection, aerosolization, fiber size, and fiber burden measurement were noted, rendering difficult a comparison between results. By inhalation, RCF and asbestos used as positive controls produced a significant tumor increase. In some studies, a low tumor yield was found after inhalation of insulation wools; when all inhalation data were gathered, a significant tumor increase was found with GW. However, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions on the potential of other fiber types because, in addition to the different compositions of the fibers, differences in fiber number and sizes existed, especially in comparison with asbestos. Moreover, experiments using inoculation, especially by the intraperitoneal route revealed a carcinogenic potential of all fibers types but GFiI and SW. In these two groups a small number of animals has been investigated and the fiber characteristics were sometimes irrelevant. So far, a relationship between the carcinogenic potency and fiber dimensions has been established. Other fiber parameters may be of importance (surface chemistry, biopersistence, fiber structure, for example) but further investigations are necessary to determine the correlations between these parameters and tumor incidence. In vitro experiments have emphasized the fiber characteristics identified in vivo as playing a role in the carcinogenic potency and should be developed as a better approach of the mechanistic effects of MMF.
format Text
id pubmed-1567084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1994
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15670842006-09-19 Review of animal/in vitro data on biological effects of man-made fibers. Ellouk, S A Jaurand, M C Environ Health Perspect Research Article This paper reviews the investigations with man-made fibers (MMF). Insulation woods: glasswool (GW), rockwool (RW), slagwool (SW), glass microfibers (GMF), glass filaments (GFiI), and refractory ceramic fibers (RCF) have been used in experimental animals and in in vitro cell systems. A large heterogeneous number of fibers, methods of fiber preparation, size selection, aerosolization, fiber size, and fiber burden measurement were noted, rendering difficult a comparison between results. By inhalation, RCF and asbestos used as positive controls produced a significant tumor increase. In some studies, a low tumor yield was found after inhalation of insulation wools; when all inhalation data were gathered, a significant tumor increase was found with GW. However, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions on the potential of other fiber types because, in addition to the different compositions of the fibers, differences in fiber number and sizes existed, especially in comparison with asbestos. Moreover, experiments using inoculation, especially by the intraperitoneal route revealed a carcinogenic potential of all fibers types but GFiI and SW. In these two groups a small number of animals has been investigated and the fiber characteristics were sometimes irrelevant. So far, a relationship between the carcinogenic potency and fiber dimensions has been established. Other fiber parameters may be of importance (surface chemistry, biopersistence, fiber structure, for example) but further investigations are necessary to determine the correlations between these parameters and tumor incidence. In vitro experiments have emphasized the fiber characteristics identified in vivo as playing a role in the carcinogenic potency and should be developed as a better approach of the mechanistic effects of MMF. 1994-06 /pmc/articles/PMC1567084/ /pubmed/7925187 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Ellouk, S A
Jaurand, M C
Review of animal/in vitro data on biological effects of man-made fibers.
title Review of animal/in vitro data on biological effects of man-made fibers.
title_full Review of animal/in vitro data on biological effects of man-made fibers.
title_fullStr Review of animal/in vitro data on biological effects of man-made fibers.
title_full_unstemmed Review of animal/in vitro data on biological effects of man-made fibers.
title_short Review of animal/in vitro data on biological effects of man-made fibers.
title_sort review of animal/in vitro data on biological effects of man-made fibers.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1567084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7925187
work_keys_str_mv AT ellouksa reviewofanimalinvitrodataonbiologicaleffectsofmanmadefibers
AT jaurandmc reviewofanimalinvitrodataonbiologicaleffectsofmanmadefibers