Cargando…

Alternative hypotheses for the role of promotion in chemical carcinogenesis.

A new protocol for carcinogenesis in rat liver is described in order that confirmatory experiments might be undertaken concurrently. The basic protocol, designated IPI (initiator + promoter + initiator), is presented in several alternative forms, including the possible use of X-irradiation as the in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Potter, V R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 1983
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6223811
_version_ 1782130155608604672
author Potter, V R
author_facet Potter, V R
author_sort Potter, V R
collection PubMed
description A new protocol for carcinogenesis in rat liver is described in order that confirmatory experiments might be undertaken concurrently. The basic protocol, designated IPI (initiator + promoter + initiator), is presented in several alternative forms, including the possible use of X-irradiation as the initiator. The rationale is discussed in terms of the two-hit somatic mutation theory of Armitage and Doll, with an initial hit produced by the first dose of initiator and expansion of single cells to sizable clones by promotion thereby increasing the probability of a second hit by the second dose of initiator. The question of relevant mutations was taken up and it was proposed that genes for chalones (C) and for chalone receptors (R) are logical targets for consideration in a two-mutation sequence. Alternative hypotheses pertaining to promoter action were described in terms of possible mechanisms by which nonelectrophilic promoters might simulate a second mutation by increasing or decreasing the levels of a nonchromosomal replicating particle in target cells.
format Text
id pubmed-1569220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1983
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15692202006-09-18 Alternative hypotheses for the role of promotion in chemical carcinogenesis. Potter, V R Environ Health Perspect Research Article A new protocol for carcinogenesis in rat liver is described in order that confirmatory experiments might be undertaken concurrently. The basic protocol, designated IPI (initiator + promoter + initiator), is presented in several alternative forms, including the possible use of X-irradiation as the initiator. The rationale is discussed in terms of the two-hit somatic mutation theory of Armitage and Doll, with an initial hit produced by the first dose of initiator and expansion of single cells to sizable clones by promotion thereby increasing the probability of a second hit by the second dose of initiator. The question of relevant mutations was taken up and it was proposed that genes for chalones (C) and for chalone receptors (R) are logical targets for consideration in a two-mutation sequence. Alternative hypotheses pertaining to promoter action were described in terms of possible mechanisms by which nonelectrophilic promoters might simulate a second mutation by increasing or decreasing the levels of a nonchromosomal replicating particle in target cells. 1983-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1569220/ /pubmed/6223811 Text en
spellingShingle Research Article
Potter, V R
Alternative hypotheses for the role of promotion in chemical carcinogenesis.
title Alternative hypotheses for the role of promotion in chemical carcinogenesis.
title_full Alternative hypotheses for the role of promotion in chemical carcinogenesis.
title_fullStr Alternative hypotheses for the role of promotion in chemical carcinogenesis.
title_full_unstemmed Alternative hypotheses for the role of promotion in chemical carcinogenesis.
title_short Alternative hypotheses for the role of promotion in chemical carcinogenesis.
title_sort alternative hypotheses for the role of promotion in chemical carcinogenesis.
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6223811
work_keys_str_mv AT pottervr alternativehypothesesfortheroleofpromotioninchemicalcarcinogenesis