Cargando…

Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis is a common sexually transmitted infection that can have serious consequences. It is universally agreed that screening for chlamydia infection should be offered to sexually active young women. We undertook a literature review to document the views, attitudes and opi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavlin, Natasha L, Gunn, Jane M, Parker, Rhian, Fairley, Christopher K, Hocking, Jane
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16948838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-221
_version_ 1782130220154748928
author Pavlin, Natasha L
Gunn, Jane M
Parker, Rhian
Fairley, Christopher K
Hocking, Jane
author_facet Pavlin, Natasha L
Gunn, Jane M
Parker, Rhian
Fairley, Christopher K
Hocking, Jane
author_sort Pavlin, Natasha L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis is a common sexually transmitted infection that can have serious consequences. It is universally agreed that screening for chlamydia infection should be offered to sexually active young women. We undertook a literature review to document the views, attitudes and opinions of women about being screened, tested and diagnosed with Chlamydia trachomatis. METHODS: Online databases (MEDLINE, Meditext, PsycINFO, Web of Science) and reference lists searched up to August 2005. Search terms: chlamydia, attitude, attitude to health, interview, qualitative, women. Eligibility criteria: about chlamydia, included women, involved interviews/surveys/focus groups, looked at women's views/opinions/attitudes, published in English. Thematic analysis identified the main and recurrent themes emerging from the literature. We compared our thematic analysis with the Theory of Planned Behaviour to provide a model that could assist in planning chlamydia screening programs. RESULTS: From 561 identified articles, 25 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were reviewed. 22: USA, UK; 3: Holland, Sweden, Australia. Major themes identified: need for knowledge and information, choice and support; concerns about confidentiality, cost, fear, anxiety and stigma. Women are more likely to find chlamydia screening/testing acceptable if they think chlamydia is a serious, common condition which can cause infertility and if they understand that chlamydia infection can be asymptomatic. Women want a range of options for chlamydia testing including urine tests, self-administered swabs, pelvic exams and clinician-collected swabs, home-testing and community-based testing. Tests should be free, easy and quick. Women want support for dealing with the implications of a chlamydia diagnosis, they feel chlamydia diagnoses need to be normalised and destigmatised and they want assistance with partner notification. Women need to know that their confidentiality will be maintained. CONCLUSION: Our review found that women from various countries and ethnic backgrounds share similar views regarding chlamydia screening, testing and diagnosis. The acknowledged importance of women's views in planning an effective chlamydia screening program is expanded in this review which details the nature and complexity of such views and considers their likely impact.
format Text
id pubmed-1569845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15698452006-09-16 Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature Pavlin, Natasha L Gunn, Jane M Parker, Rhian Fairley, Christopher K Hocking, Jane BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis is a common sexually transmitted infection that can have serious consequences. It is universally agreed that screening for chlamydia infection should be offered to sexually active young women. We undertook a literature review to document the views, attitudes and opinions of women about being screened, tested and diagnosed with Chlamydia trachomatis. METHODS: Online databases (MEDLINE, Meditext, PsycINFO, Web of Science) and reference lists searched up to August 2005. Search terms: chlamydia, attitude, attitude to health, interview, qualitative, women. Eligibility criteria: about chlamydia, included women, involved interviews/surveys/focus groups, looked at women's views/opinions/attitudes, published in English. Thematic analysis identified the main and recurrent themes emerging from the literature. We compared our thematic analysis with the Theory of Planned Behaviour to provide a model that could assist in planning chlamydia screening programs. RESULTS: From 561 identified articles, 25 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were reviewed. 22: USA, UK; 3: Holland, Sweden, Australia. Major themes identified: need for knowledge and information, choice and support; concerns about confidentiality, cost, fear, anxiety and stigma. Women are more likely to find chlamydia screening/testing acceptable if they think chlamydia is a serious, common condition which can cause infertility and if they understand that chlamydia infection can be asymptomatic. Women want a range of options for chlamydia testing including urine tests, self-administered swabs, pelvic exams and clinician-collected swabs, home-testing and community-based testing. Tests should be free, easy and quick. Women want support for dealing with the implications of a chlamydia diagnosis, they feel chlamydia diagnoses need to be normalised and destigmatised and they want assistance with partner notification. Women need to know that their confidentiality will be maintained. CONCLUSION: Our review found that women from various countries and ethnic backgrounds share similar views regarding chlamydia screening, testing and diagnosis. The acknowledged importance of women's views in planning an effective chlamydia screening program is expanded in this review which details the nature and complexity of such views and considers their likely impact. BioMed Central 2006-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC1569845/ /pubmed/16948838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-221 Text en Copyright © 2006 Pavlin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pavlin, Natasha L
Gunn, Jane M
Parker, Rhian
Fairley, Christopher K
Hocking, Jane
Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
title Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
title_full Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
title_short Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature
title_sort implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? a systematic review of the literature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16948838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-221
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlinnatashal implementingchlamydiascreeningwhatdowomenthinkasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT gunnjanem implementingchlamydiascreeningwhatdowomenthinkasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT parkerrhian implementingchlamydiascreeningwhatdowomenthinkasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT fairleychristopherk implementingchlamydiascreeningwhatdowomenthinkasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT hockingjane implementingchlamydiascreeningwhatdowomenthinkasystematicreviewoftheliterature