Cargando…

Contributions to variability of clinical measures for use as indicators of udder health status in a clinical protocol

A cross-sectional observational study with repeated observations was conducted on 16 Danish dairy farms to quantify the influence of observer, parity, time (stage in lactation) and farm on variables routinely selected for inclusion in clinical protocols, thereby to enable a more valid comparison of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fossing, C, Vaarst, M, Houe, H, Enevoldsen, C
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16987394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-48-15
_version_ 1782130222303281152
author Fossing, C
Vaarst, M
Houe, H
Enevoldsen, C
author_facet Fossing, C
Vaarst, M
Houe, H
Enevoldsen, C
author_sort Fossing, C
collection PubMed
description A cross-sectional observational study with repeated observations was conducted on 16 Danish dairy farms to quantify the influence of observer, parity, time (stage in lactation) and farm on variables routinely selected for inclusion in clinical protocols, thereby to enable a more valid comparison of udder health between different herds. During 12 months, participating herds were visited 5 times by project technicians, who examined 20 cows and scored the selected clinical variables. The estimates of effect on variables were derived from a random regression model procedure. Statistical analyses revealed that, although estimates for occurrence of several the variables, e.g. degree of oedema, varied significantly between observers, the effects on many of these estimates were similar in size. Almost all estimates for occurrences of variables were significantly affected either parity and lactation stage, or by both e.g. udder tissue consistency. Some variables, e.g. mange, had high estimates for the farm component, and others e.g. teat skin quality had a high individual component. Several of the variables, e.g. wounds on warts, had a high residual component indicating that a there still was a major part of the variation in data, which was unexplained. It was concluded that most of the variables were relevant for implementation in herd health management, but that adjustments need to be made to improve reliability.
format Text
id pubmed-1569854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15698542006-09-16 Contributions to variability of clinical measures for use as indicators of udder health status in a clinical protocol Fossing, C Vaarst, M Houe, H Enevoldsen, C Acta Vet Scand Research A cross-sectional observational study with repeated observations was conducted on 16 Danish dairy farms to quantify the influence of observer, parity, time (stage in lactation) and farm on variables routinely selected for inclusion in clinical protocols, thereby to enable a more valid comparison of udder health between different herds. During 12 months, participating herds were visited 5 times by project technicians, who examined 20 cows and scored the selected clinical variables. The estimates of effect on variables were derived from a random regression model procedure. Statistical analyses revealed that, although estimates for occurrence of several the variables, e.g. degree of oedema, varied significantly between observers, the effects on many of these estimates were similar in size. Almost all estimates for occurrences of variables were significantly affected either parity and lactation stage, or by both e.g. udder tissue consistency. Some variables, e.g. mange, had high estimates for the farm component, and others e.g. teat skin quality had a high individual component. Several of the variables, e.g. wounds on warts, had a high residual component indicating that a there still was a major part of the variation in data, which was unexplained. It was concluded that most of the variables were relevant for implementation in herd health management, but that adjustments need to be made to improve reliability. BioMed Central 2006-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC1569854/ /pubmed/16987394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-48-15 Text en Copyright © 2006 Fossing et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Fossing, C
Vaarst, M
Houe, H
Enevoldsen, C
Contributions to variability of clinical measures for use as indicators of udder health status in a clinical protocol
title Contributions to variability of clinical measures for use as indicators of udder health status in a clinical protocol
title_full Contributions to variability of clinical measures for use as indicators of udder health status in a clinical protocol
title_fullStr Contributions to variability of clinical measures for use as indicators of udder health status in a clinical protocol
title_full_unstemmed Contributions to variability of clinical measures for use as indicators of udder health status in a clinical protocol
title_short Contributions to variability of clinical measures for use as indicators of udder health status in a clinical protocol
title_sort contributions to variability of clinical measures for use as indicators of udder health status in a clinical protocol
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16987394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-48-15
work_keys_str_mv AT fossingc contributionstovariabilityofclinicalmeasuresforuseasindicatorsofudderhealthstatusinaclinicalprotocol
AT vaarstm contributionstovariabilityofclinicalmeasuresforuseasindicatorsofudderhealthstatusinaclinicalprotocol
AT houeh contributionstovariabilityofclinicalmeasuresforuseasindicatorsofudderhealthstatusinaclinicalprotocol
AT enevoldsenc contributionstovariabilityofclinicalmeasuresforuseasindicatorsofudderhealthstatusinaclinicalprotocol