Cargando…

Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) must be of high quality. The purpose of our research was to compare the methodological and reporting quality of original versus updated Cochrane SRs to determine whether updating had improved these two quality dimensions. METHODS: We identifed updated Cochrane SR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Shea, Beverley, Boers, Maarten, Grimshaw, Jeremy M, Hamel, Candyce, Bouter, Lex M
Formato:	Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2006
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1569863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16772030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-6-27

Ejemplares similares

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)
por: Shea, Beverley J., et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist
por: Terwee, Caroline B., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Improving quality of care for persons with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews - what does the evidence tell us?
por: Worswick, Julia, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement
por: Vinkers, Christiaan H., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content
por: Mokkink, Lidwine B, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

PROTOCOL: The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: a methodological systematic review
por: Wang, Xiaoqin, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Quality improvement needed in quality improvement randomised trials: systematic review of interventions to improve care in diabetes
por: Ivers, Noah M, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study
por: Mokkink, Lidwine B., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Invited Commentary on “Investigating the Reliability and Factor Structure of Kalichman’s ‘Survey 2: Research Misconduct’ Questionnaire”
por: Bouter, Lex M.
Publicado: (2017)

AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
por: Shea, Beverley J, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The methodological and reporting characteristics of Campbell reviews: A systematic review
por: Wang, Xiaoqin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Screening for depression in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review update
por: Beck, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity
por: Bouter, Lex
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting of key methodological and ethical aspects of cluster trials in hemodialysis require improvement: a systematic review
por: Al-Jaishi, Ahmed A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Does the world need a scientific society for research on how to improve healthcare?
por: Wensing, Michel, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Improving the reproducibility of findings by updating research methodology
por: Klein, Joseph
Publicado: (2021)

Does contracting of health care in Afghanistan work? Public and service-users' perceptions and experience
por: Cockcroft, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach
por: de Vet, Henrica C. W., et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Subfertility: A Comparison of Two Different Approaches
por: Popovich, Ivor, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
por: Pussegoda, Kusala, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Improving peer review of systematic reviews by involving librarians and information specialists: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
por: Rethlefsen, Melissa L., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Trialists perspectives on sustaining, spreading, and scaling-up of quality improvement interventions
por: Laur, Celia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Do quality improvement initiatives for diabetes care address social inequities? Secondary analysis of a systematic review
por: Lu, Jacquie Boyang, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: a case study on abstract reporting bias
por: Duyx, Bram, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Reporting and methodological quality of COVID-19 systematic reviews needs to be improved: an evidence mapping
por: Li, Yanfei, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Methodologic attributes of quality improvement studies in neonatology: a systematic survey
por: Hu, Zheng Jing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Methodology and reporting quality of reporting guidelines: systematic review
por: Wang, Xiaoqin, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Systematic review and meta-analyses of studies analysing instructions to authors from 1987 to 2017
por: Malički, Mario, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE DOES NOT MEAN DO-NOT-CARE: A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVE
por: Omar, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Methodological guidance for the evaluation and updating of clinical prediction models: a systematic review
por: Binuya, M. A. E., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews
por: Welsh, Emma J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Methodological quality of Campbell Systematic Reviews has improved over the past decade
por: Li, Yanfei, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Update on Koro research methodology
por: Chowdhury, Arabinda Narayan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Antenatal and postpartum prevention of Rh alloimmunization: A systematic review and GRADE analysis
por: Hamel, Candyce, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Does Expert Advice Improve Educational Choice?
por: Borghans, Lex, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor-Treatment Does Not Show Beneficial Effects on Cognition or Amyloid Burden in Cognitively Impaired and Cognitively Normal Subjects
por: Bouter, Yvonne, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Facilitating quality improvement in primary healthcare using performance feedback and action planning
por: Vachon, Brigitte, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Protocol: An updated integrated methodology for analysis of metabolites and enzyme activities of ethylene biosynthesis
por: Bulens, Inge, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Screening for esophageal adenocarcinoma and precancerous conditions (dysplasia and Barrett’s esophagus) in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease with or without other risk factors: two systematic reviews and one overview of reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC)
por: Hamel, Candyce, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_5eg8ds533s5ontuvf2u9hsjjt8