Cargando…

A reliable morphological method to assess the age of male Anopheles gambiae

BACKGROUND: Release of genetically-modified (GM) or sterile male mosquitoes for malaria control is hampered by inability to assess the age and mating history of free-living male Anopheles. METHODS: Age and mating-related changes in the reproductive system of male Anopheles gambiae were quantified an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huho, Bernadette J, Ng'habi, Kija R, Killeen, Gerry F, Nkwengulila, Gamba, Knols, Bart GJ, Ferguson, Heather M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1570359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16872516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-5-62
_version_ 1782130258154094592
author Huho, Bernadette J
Ng'habi, Kija R
Killeen, Gerry F
Nkwengulila, Gamba
Knols, Bart GJ
Ferguson, Heather M
author_facet Huho, Bernadette J
Ng'habi, Kija R
Killeen, Gerry F
Nkwengulila, Gamba
Knols, Bart GJ
Ferguson, Heather M
author_sort Huho, Bernadette J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Release of genetically-modified (GM) or sterile male mosquitoes for malaria control is hampered by inability to assess the age and mating history of free-living male Anopheles. METHODS: Age and mating-related changes in the reproductive system of male Anopheles gambiae were quantified and used to fit predictive statistical models. These models, based on numbers of spermatocysts, relative size of sperm reservoir and presence/absence of a clear area around the accessory gland, were evaluated using an independent sample of mosquitoes whose status was blinded during the experiment. RESULTS: The number of spermatocysts in male testes decreased with age, and the relative size of their sperm reservoir increased. The presence of a clear area around accessory glands was also linked to age and mating status. A quantitative model was able to categorize males from the blind trial into age groups of young (≤ 4 days) and old (> 4 days) with an overall efficiency of 89%. Using the parameters of this model, a simple table was compiled that can be used to predict male age. In contrast, mating history could not be reliably assessed as virgins could not be distinguished from mated males. CONCLUSION: Simple assessment of a few morphological traits which are easily collected in the field allows accurate age-grading of male An. gambiae. This simple, yet robust, model enables evaluation of demographic patterns and mortality in wild and released males in populations targeted by GM or sterile male-based control programmes.
format Text
id pubmed-1570359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15703592006-09-20 A reliable morphological method to assess the age of male Anopheles gambiae Huho, Bernadette J Ng'habi, Kija R Killeen, Gerry F Nkwengulila, Gamba Knols, Bart GJ Ferguson, Heather M Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Release of genetically-modified (GM) or sterile male mosquitoes for malaria control is hampered by inability to assess the age and mating history of free-living male Anopheles. METHODS: Age and mating-related changes in the reproductive system of male Anopheles gambiae were quantified and used to fit predictive statistical models. These models, based on numbers of spermatocysts, relative size of sperm reservoir and presence/absence of a clear area around the accessory gland, were evaluated using an independent sample of mosquitoes whose status was blinded during the experiment. RESULTS: The number of spermatocysts in male testes decreased with age, and the relative size of their sperm reservoir increased. The presence of a clear area around accessory glands was also linked to age and mating status. A quantitative model was able to categorize males from the blind trial into age groups of young (≤ 4 days) and old (> 4 days) with an overall efficiency of 89%. Using the parameters of this model, a simple table was compiled that can be used to predict male age. In contrast, mating history could not be reliably assessed as virgins could not be distinguished from mated males. CONCLUSION: Simple assessment of a few morphological traits which are easily collected in the field allows accurate age-grading of male An. gambiae. This simple, yet robust, model enables evaluation of demographic patterns and mortality in wild and released males in populations targeted by GM or sterile male-based control programmes. BioMed Central 2006-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC1570359/ /pubmed/16872516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-5-62 Text en Copyright © 2006 Huho et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Huho, Bernadette J
Ng'habi, Kija R
Killeen, Gerry F
Nkwengulila, Gamba
Knols, Bart GJ
Ferguson, Heather M
A reliable morphological method to assess the age of male Anopheles gambiae
title A reliable morphological method to assess the age of male Anopheles gambiae
title_full A reliable morphological method to assess the age of male Anopheles gambiae
title_fullStr A reliable morphological method to assess the age of male Anopheles gambiae
title_full_unstemmed A reliable morphological method to assess the age of male Anopheles gambiae
title_short A reliable morphological method to assess the age of male Anopheles gambiae
title_sort reliable morphological method to assess the age of male anopheles gambiae
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1570359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16872516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-5-62
work_keys_str_mv AT huhobernadettej areliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae
AT nghabikijar areliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae
AT killeengerryf areliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae
AT nkwengulilagamba areliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae
AT knolsbartgj areliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae
AT fergusonheatherm areliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae
AT huhobernadettej reliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae
AT nghabikijar reliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae
AT killeengerryf reliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae
AT nkwengulilagamba reliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae
AT knolsbartgj reliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae
AT fergusonheatherm reliablemorphologicalmethodtoassesstheageofmaleanophelesgambiae