Cargando…

Comparison of chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of genomic imbalances in primary prostate carcinomas

BACKGROUND: In order to gain new insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in prostate cancer, we performed array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on a series of 46 primary prostate carcinomas using a 1 Mbp whole-genome coverage platform. As chromosomal comparative genomic hybrid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ribeiro, Franclim R, Henrique, Rui, Hektoen, Merete, Berg, Marianne, Jerónimo, Carmen, Teixeira, Manuel R, Lothe, Ragnhild A
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1570364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16952311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-5-33
_version_ 1782130259323256832
author Ribeiro, Franclim R
Henrique, Rui
Hektoen, Merete
Berg, Marianne
Jerónimo, Carmen
Teixeira, Manuel R
Lothe, Ragnhild A
author_facet Ribeiro, Franclim R
Henrique, Rui
Hektoen, Merete
Berg, Marianne
Jerónimo, Carmen
Teixeira, Manuel R
Lothe, Ragnhild A
author_sort Ribeiro, Franclim R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In order to gain new insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in prostate cancer, we performed array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on a series of 46 primary prostate carcinomas using a 1 Mbp whole-genome coverage platform. As chromosomal comparative genomic hybridization (cCGH) data was available for these samples, we compared the sensitivity and overall concordance of the two methodologies, and used the combined information to infer the best of three different aCGH scoring approaches. RESULTS: Our data demonstrate that the reliability of aCGH in the analysis of primary prostate carcinomas depends to some extent on the scoring approach used, with the breakpoint estimation method being the most sensitive and reliable. The pattern of copy number changes detected by aCGH was concordant with that of cCGH, but the higher resolution technique detected 2.7 times more aberrations and 15.2% more carcinomas with genomic imbalances. We additionally show that several aberrations were consistently overlooked using cCGH, such as small deletions at 5q, 6q, 12p, and 17p. The latter were validated by fluorescence in situ hybridization targeting TP53, although only one carcinoma harbored a point mutation in this gene. Strikingly, homozygous deletions at 10q23.31, encompassing the PTEN locus, were seen in 58% of the cases with 10q loss. CONCLUSION: We conclude that aCGH can significantly improve the detection of genomic aberrations in cancer cells as compared to previously established whole-genome methodologies, although contamination with normal cells may influence the sensitivity and specificity of some scoring approaches. Our work delineated recurrent copy number changes and revealed novel amplified loci and frequent homozygous deletions in primary prostate carcinomas, which may guide future work aimed at identifying the relevant target genes. In particular, biallelic loss seems to be a frequent mechanism of inactivation of the PTEN gene in prostate carcinogenesis.
format Text
id pubmed-1570364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-15703642006-09-20 Comparison of chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of genomic imbalances in primary prostate carcinomas Ribeiro, Franclim R Henrique, Rui Hektoen, Merete Berg, Marianne Jerónimo, Carmen Teixeira, Manuel R Lothe, Ragnhild A Mol Cancer Research BACKGROUND: In order to gain new insights into the molecular mechanisms involved in prostate cancer, we performed array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) on a series of 46 primary prostate carcinomas using a 1 Mbp whole-genome coverage platform. As chromosomal comparative genomic hybridization (cCGH) data was available for these samples, we compared the sensitivity and overall concordance of the two methodologies, and used the combined information to infer the best of three different aCGH scoring approaches. RESULTS: Our data demonstrate that the reliability of aCGH in the analysis of primary prostate carcinomas depends to some extent on the scoring approach used, with the breakpoint estimation method being the most sensitive and reliable. The pattern of copy number changes detected by aCGH was concordant with that of cCGH, but the higher resolution technique detected 2.7 times more aberrations and 15.2% more carcinomas with genomic imbalances. We additionally show that several aberrations were consistently overlooked using cCGH, such as small deletions at 5q, 6q, 12p, and 17p. The latter were validated by fluorescence in situ hybridization targeting TP53, although only one carcinoma harbored a point mutation in this gene. Strikingly, homozygous deletions at 10q23.31, encompassing the PTEN locus, were seen in 58% of the cases with 10q loss. CONCLUSION: We conclude that aCGH can significantly improve the detection of genomic aberrations in cancer cells as compared to previously established whole-genome methodologies, although contamination with normal cells may influence the sensitivity and specificity of some scoring approaches. Our work delineated recurrent copy number changes and revealed novel amplified loci and frequent homozygous deletions in primary prostate carcinomas, which may guide future work aimed at identifying the relevant target genes. In particular, biallelic loss seems to be a frequent mechanism of inactivation of the PTEN gene in prostate carcinogenesis. BioMed Central 2006-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC1570364/ /pubmed/16952311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-5-33 Text en Copyright © 2006 Ribeiro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Ribeiro, Franclim R
Henrique, Rui
Hektoen, Merete
Berg, Marianne
Jerónimo, Carmen
Teixeira, Manuel R
Lothe, Ragnhild A
Comparison of chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of genomic imbalances in primary prostate carcinomas
title Comparison of chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of genomic imbalances in primary prostate carcinomas
title_full Comparison of chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of genomic imbalances in primary prostate carcinomas
title_fullStr Comparison of chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of genomic imbalances in primary prostate carcinomas
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of genomic imbalances in primary prostate carcinomas
title_short Comparison of chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of genomic imbalances in primary prostate carcinomas
title_sort comparison of chromosomal and array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of genomic imbalances in primary prostate carcinomas
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1570364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16952311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-5-33
work_keys_str_mv AT ribeirofranclimr comparisonofchromosomalandarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationforthedetectionofgenomicimbalancesinprimaryprostatecarcinomas
AT henriquerui comparisonofchromosomalandarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationforthedetectionofgenomicimbalancesinprimaryprostatecarcinomas
AT hektoenmerete comparisonofchromosomalandarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationforthedetectionofgenomicimbalancesinprimaryprostatecarcinomas
AT bergmarianne comparisonofchromosomalandarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationforthedetectionofgenomicimbalancesinprimaryprostatecarcinomas
AT jeronimocarmen comparisonofchromosomalandarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationforthedetectionofgenomicimbalancesinprimaryprostatecarcinomas
AT teixeiramanuelr comparisonofchromosomalandarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationforthedetectionofgenomicimbalancesinprimaryprostatecarcinomas
AT lotheragnhilda comparisonofchromosomalandarraybasedcomparativegenomichybridizationforthedetectionofgenomicimbalancesinprimaryprostatecarcinomas